|
ToiletDuckie posted:Ask if, as president, Mr. Trump will apologize on behalf of the "United" States of America for the War of Northern Aggression and will personally attend the restoration of the historically significant Confederate flag to its proper place upon the State House in Columbia. you say that as if it would put him into some kind of bind but his target demographic would respond unambiguously favourably to him just saying "yes"
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 11:36 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 14:16 |
|
the fact is that white and/or christian nationalists simply are not american nationalists; they consider treason to be justified and good if it is in defence of their favoured ideologies, ergo they consider the confederacy to actually be Not That Bad, if not outright Good. they are a subversive element and fully deserve to be violently purged from society, and it would greatly benefit us all if this happened.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 11:38 |
|
Good luck stalking a politician you don't like out of spite tomorrow sad guy!
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 11:48 |
|
good luck killing him. it's unironically the best chance you'll ever get to really give back to your country.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 11:49 |
|
thatguy posted:While these are groundbreaking concepts and you might not be familiar with them, Internal combustion and mass transit might actually allow me to not live in aiken you loving retard loving lol you're traveling to aiken that's even worse
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 11:50 |
|
internal combustion also lets you shoot people
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 12:03 |
|
Ask him if you can cum in his hair Despite the amswer, cum in his hair
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 12:08 |
|
Say hi to Clay for me make a joke about how he always gets 2nd place
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 12:32 |
|
Ork of Fiction posted:Good luck stalking a politician you don't like out of spite tomorrow sad guy!
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 13:20 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:good luck killing him. it's unironically the best chance you'll ever get to really give back to your country. brb making a breathless dailycaller article about this post
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 13:47 |
|
bring a generic pro-trump sign which secretly unfolds to reveal goatse.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 13:56 |
|
gently caress his wife and daughter.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 14:15 |
|
Also, Lowtax going to get a few visits again based on some replies in this thread.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 14:17 |
|
XMNN posted:going to a single public event isn't stalking moRon also i don't think he should be called a politician until he wins something
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:15 |
|
ashgromnies posted:also i don't think he should be called a politician until he wins something politics is the trade of influencing public policy and he's definitely doing that even if it isn't to his advantage or to the advantage of anyone with any functional sense of ethics, which is why someone should definitely kill him, along with anyone who thinks he is good
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:18 |
Dress up as Trump and make a better speech than he was going to, then solicit donations. Duh.
|
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:21 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:the fact is that white and/or christian nationalists simply are not american nationalists; they consider treason to be justified and good if it is in defence of their favoured ideologies, ergo they consider the confederacy to actually be Not That Bad, if not outright Good. they are a subversive element and fully deserve to be violently purged from society, and it would greatly benefit us all if this happened. Justin Godscock posted:Or scream "ALL HAIL THE FUHRER!" during a pause in his speech.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:32 |
|
Knight posted:But getting white nationalists to talk poo poo about America will put them at odds with American nationalists, and they will eat each other. well uh good? american nationalists should be eating everyone else, it's just an unfortunate fact that there aren't very many of us TacticalUrbanHomo posted:the fact is that white and/or christian nationalists simply are not american nationalists; they consider treason to be justified and good if it is in defence of their favoured ideologies, ergo they consider the confederacy to actually be Not That Bad, if not outright Good. they are a subversive element and fully deserve to be violently purged from society, and it would greatly benefit us all if this happened. Knight posted:How is anyone supposed to notice this in a crowd of thousands of others screaming "HAIL THE FUHRER"? please do not imply that trump is a legitimate fascist, because he's not. fascism necessarily aims for class collaboration, whereas trump desires only class subjugation. he is a capitalist through and through, his racism is far less important than his classism, see his business dealings with his UAE counterpart who doesn't give a poo poo that his primary american development partner is currently running a publicity campaign on anti-arab rhetoric TacticalUrbanHomo fucked around with this message at 15:37 on Dec 11, 2015 |
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:35 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:well uh good? american nationalists should be eating everyone else, it's just an unfortunate fact that there aren't very many of us That second thing was just a throwaway joke
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 15:50 |
|
poo poo your pants, sit there like nothing happened. If you stand up to ask your question say "I poo poo my pants." and sit back down as if nothing happened. or When you stand up to ask your question, ask him if he will remove incest laws so he can gently caress his hot rear end daughter, because you know, he will be president and can do those kinds of things.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:02 |
|
Knight posted:I was replying in the context of your "you say that as if it would put him into some kind of bind" post right before it. Anything that seeds division would be good but what I'm saying is that there wouldn't be any division, because there is no serious american nationalist movement in modern politics. if any such thing began to seriously become popular, people like Trump and Cruz and Palin would immediately and vehemently oppose it. so absolutely nothing bad would come of Trump answering your question with a "yes", and if you asked it at a GOP debate there wouldn't even be (as is so often the case) any debate, the candidates would all say yes and then argue over which of them means it the most. their voters would applaud, the democrats would go "ha see the republicans are all racists" and nothing would change because we all know that already.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:41 |
|
lol what nationalism is endemic to american politics and culture
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:42 |
|
XMNN posted:going to a single public event isn't stalking moRon Also you cannot stalk a person running for President. They've opened up their homes & lives to all voters.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:45 |
|
XMNN posted:lol what nationalism is endemic to american politics and culture christian nationalism is, white nationalism is, american nationalism is not, and it is essentially dead. american hegemony is ubiquitous in american politics and I suspect it is this to which you are referring but hegemony does not imply nationalism and in this case it is merely incidental to the agendas of the foremost mentioned ideologies along with increasing levels of capitalist cronyism in the ranks of their affiliated organisations. you could make a strong argument that american nationalism is alive and well in american culture and I'd very much like to agree although in truth I don't have the necessary data to make an honest assessment of the truth of that, because the state of the nation's culture is not likely to be faithfully reflected in either politics or media due to the aforementioned cronyism.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:46 |
|
the platform of the democratic party is becoming increasingly populist which gives me hope. unfortunately right now I get the impression (though again I can't honestly assert this as fact, it is only a subjective impression) that too many of their supporters favour their policies not because they are objectively good for the well-being of the nation but because of a doctrinal commitment to an agenda of social egalitarianism. but even if that's the case, over the course of a generation or two that has real potential to morph into a legitimate nationalist movement.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:52 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:the platform of the democratic party is becoming increasingly populist which gives me hope. unfortunately right now I get the impression (though again I can't honestly assert this as fact, it is only a subjective impression) that too many of their supporters favour their policies not because they are objectively good for the well-being of the nation but because of a doctrinal commitment to an agenda of social egalitarianism. but even if that's the case, over the course of a generation or two that has real potential to morph into a legitimate nationalist movement. You've been banned for racism. LOL
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:56 |
|
Boinks posted:You've been banned for racism. mods gay, so what not sure what that has to do with the fact that america is a plutocracy
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:58 |
|
Be sure to post again after he has converted you.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 16:59 |
|
memorize the above posts and quote them verbatim at anyone who comes near you
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:01 |
|
Yell Allahabad Akbar
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:01 |
|
CatfishClyde posted:sit quietly and open your mind to a different viewpoint
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:08 |
|
The Human Crouton posted:Be sure to post again after he has converted you. If anything I'll be converted to Conservative Republican.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:12 |
|
Make SA relevant again OP!
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:12 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:the platform of the democratic party is becoming increasingly populist which gives me hope. unfortunately right now I get the impression (though again I can't honestly assert this as fact, it is only a subjective impression) that too many of their supporters favour their policies not because they are objectively good for the well-being of the nation but because of a doctrinal commitment to an agenda of social egalitarianism. but even if that's the case, over the course of a generation or two that has real potential to morph into a legitimate nationalist movement. ok, I'll bite: What exactly is the problem with pushing social egalitarianism? can't that in itself be "objectively good for the well-being of the nation"?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:17 |
|
Sit down and listen to how Trump will make America great again.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:21 |
|
Race Realists posted:ok, I'll bite: What exactly is the problem with pushing social egalitarianism? can't that in itself be "objectively good for the well-being of the nation"? it can be, and to a certain extent it is. that's why it gives me hope that it's becoming increasingly popular. egalitarianism can be pursued, but never attained, so it's facile for it to be anyone's end-goal. a more egalitarian society is good in the context of an obscene amount of consolidation on the part of the wealthy elite, which I suspect is in large part why it's become so popular among americans. my problem with social democrats isn't that want to make society more egalitarian, my problem is that they either don't know why they want to do so, or they want to do so for reasons that ultimately are not conducive to the needs and best interests of the state.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:28 |
|
cum in your hand and wipe it on his face OP
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 17:40 |
|
TacticalUrbanHomo posted:they want to do so for reasons that ultimately are not conducive to the needs and best interests of the state. you realize this is literally what started the American civil war right? maybe i went too far with this but drat that sounds like the concept of states rights BornAPoorBlkChild fucked around with this message at 18:04 on Dec 11, 2015 |
# ? Dec 11, 2015 18:02 |
|
Ask him to sign a copy of My New Order, which is Hitler's sequel to Mein Kampf and a book that Trump literally by his bed.
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 18:04 |
|
|
# ? May 12, 2024 14:16 |
|
Race Realists posted:you realize this is literally what started the American civil war right? the confederacy was fundamentally an aristocratic insurrection and their express goal was the preservation of personal property rights at the expense of the powers of the state, so more or less completely antithetical to what I'm talking about I actually have no idea how you arrived at your conclusion. what is it you think the phrase "states rights" means?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2015 18:06 |