|
I can't be arsed to upload an image but "cum" is surprisingly falling in popularity hard, specially for the last decade need more books about cum
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 02:51 |
|
|
Don Tacorleone posted:I can't be arsed to upload an image but "cum" is surprisingly falling in popularity hard, specially for the last decade Interesting, what has taken its place instead? Splooge, spunk, semen, cummies?
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 18:54
|
|
|
We now have forensic evidence indicating that the Saiyan Saga occurred circa 1920
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 19:04
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
final2percent posted:We now have forensic evidence indicating that the Saiyan Saga occurred circa 1920 I definitely didn't think to do that. I tried goku/vegeta just out of curiosity and was just perplexed by the apparent popularity of the latter over the last century.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
Me too! I think Vegeta's rise (and subsequent fall) is connected to these types of elm trees: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulmus_%C3%97_hollandica_%27Vegeta%27_(Chichester_Elm) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulmus_%C3%97_hollandica_%27Vegeta%27_(Huntingdon_Elm)
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
Germstore posted:This thing is broken. ur broken bro
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
 The world is slowly going to poo poo since the sixties...
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:16
|
|
|
Stallone's influence is still strong 30 years later.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
Correlation.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:33
|
|
|
Civil War was actually fought for subs v.dubs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:45
|
|
|
DoctorStrangelove posted:Civil War was actually fought for subs v.dubs. still bitter that dubs won not MY goku
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
For the purpose of comparing anime collections a dub counts as 3/5 of a sub.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
Billy C topped the Ron but GWB is on the rise in 2008! Change you can believe in! 
wireframeskull fucked around with this message at 22:25 on Dec 11, 2015 |
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
google ngram only searches books and nobody publishes books as much starting circa 2000 so it will become less and less accurate as time goes on. even retarded people get published hough: irregardless 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:39
|
|
|
 woah dude
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:41
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 22:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 06:59
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 08:21
|
|
|
What is this measuring? At first I thought it was occurrences of words in books that Google had scanned or eaten or whatever they do. Is it just English? Nglish...
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 08:48
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 09:05
|
|
|
 What did shart used to mean?
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 09:07
|
|
|
https://books.google.com/ngrams/gra...0thread%3B%2Cc0 It's way too much work to turn that into an image and post it
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 13:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 14:45
|
|
|
  Reddit really peaked back in the 1800s. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 16:12
|
|
|
I.C. posted:What is this measuring? At first I thought it was occurrences of words in books that Google had scanned or eaten or whatever they do. That is what it's measuring
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 16:17
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 20:52
|
|
|
So Muslims went into hiding between 1850 and 1950, and after re-emerging they never regained the popularity of the golden era of Mahometans and Mussulmen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 21:06
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:So Muslims went into hiding between 1850 and 1950, and after re-emerging they never regained the popularity of the golden era of Mahometans and Mussulmen. you forgot Saracen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 21:10
|
|
|
 A serious deficiency that must be rectified!
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 21:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
Your defense of "well that's just what everyone called them back then" is looking pretty flimsy, Mom  
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 21:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
 Hef Vs. Flynt
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 22:51
|
|
|
this thing is really fun, i have been playing with it for a bit an finding all kinds of irrelevant facts. i wonder if they mean anything? i hope someone figures out a way to glean useful information out of this novelty
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
Our confidence in technology has greatly diminished since the 1810s
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 23:51
|
|
|
I mean whatever this Ngram thing is supposed to do it's flawed as gently caress, no one is using Myspace or the word "myspace" more than facebook today. Not in books or elsewhere. Or the word "shart" being used sporadically through the 1700s? This poo poo is almost as useless as google's acid trip thing that turns every picture into pictures of dogs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 23:54
|
|
|
Rutibex posted:this thing is really fun, i have been playing with it for a bit an finding all kinds of irrelevant facts. i wonder if they mean anything? i hope someone figures out a way to glean useful information out of this novelty 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 23:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 22, 2024 02:51 |
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2015 23:56
|
|