|
Satellit3 posted:"a long time" 
|
#
?
Apr 28, 2016 01:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 03:03 |
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
May 3, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
The new smlies are IN. Schwing!  Bwahm bwahm!  Scheshaaah!  Wrroooop!  PEoooohwhop! Chih chi chahh!  Shwoop shwap! 
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 26, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
Puhduh-puhduh-pudduh WRRRAAAHHHHHH.  Twah.  
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 01:23
|
|
|
v. powerful
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 04:38
|
|
|
i like teh forums emoji
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 12:30
|
|
|
i think i like this one
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 13:36
|
|
|
 perfect
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 13:39
|
|
|
The Puppet Master posted:
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 15:23
|
|
|
There are a lot of smilies but it's hard to use them because there are so many. I think that 1 random smiie should be scripted into each post by the forums. Okay, thanks for reading my idea.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:now all they need to do is get rid of that white pixel in i like the pixel.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 18:12
|
|
|
its cool to think about that when that emotiocon was made the white pixel was, relatively, very large on our small monitors when it was realed 9999 years ago. Now, in 2016 our monitors are bigger and the pixels are smaller. Maybe soon, in the future, the pixels will be so small we wont even see the white pixel.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 18:15
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:There are a lot of smilies but it's hard to use them because there are so many. I think that 1 random smiie should be scripted into each post by the forums. Okay, thanks for reading my idea.
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 18:23
|
|
|
Also ZDR please replace:
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
Sereri posted:Also ZDR please replace: oh my god! e: poo poo, i thought it was finally fixed
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 19:19
|
|
|
Smythe posted:its cool to think about that when that emotiocon was made the white pixel was, relatively, very large on our small monitors when it was realed 9999 years ago. Now, in 2016 our monitors are bigger and the pixels are smaller. Maybe soon, in the future, the pixels will be so small we wont even see the white pixel. someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! for instance: 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! haha
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 20:13
|
|
|
Sereri posted:Also ZDR please replace: ZDR please do the needful
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 20:17
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! yes
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 20:19
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! not animated, please revise
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Sereri posted:Also ZDR please replace: Ozma has specifically said she likes the white pixel and won't fix it
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 21:18
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! rofl
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 21:19
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people!
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
Sereri posted:not animated, please revise im not a gif expert so it took me like 15 tries to get this animated right. interesting how the image is technically correct with the white part of the eyes in the sw quadrant, but visually correct when it's in the ne corner 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
ok now do the red one
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:im not a gif expert so it took me like 15 tries to get this animated right. interesting how the image is technically correct with the white part of the eyes in the sw quadrant, but visually correct when it's in the ne corner
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 22:38
|
|
|
think i'll end every post with
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
Moist von Lipwig posted:Ozma has specifically said she likes the white pixel and won't fix it well Ozma isnt around anymore so maybe its a thing that can happen now?
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:the white part is the sclera, not a reflection ahhhhhh you're right. this way looks much better. thx  Fuzzy Mammal posted:ok now do the red one  
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
loving Smooth
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 23:35
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:loving Smooth
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Mods please update the emoji to be this huge thing.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 01:38
|
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Mods please update the
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 02:02
|
|
|
Peanut and the Gang posted:Mods please update the
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
its possible to do animations in svg instead of gif-ifying a biggie image
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
imgur doesn't host svgs though. does SA embed them?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! lmao
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
if lowtax pays me, let's say, a $5000 honorarium i'll go through and vectorize all the somethingawful smilies that are either non-animated or have <4 frames
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 18:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 5, 2024 03:03 |
|
|
Sagebrush posted:if lowtax pays me, let's say, a $5000 honorarium i'll go through and vectorize all the somethingawful smilies that are either non-animated or have <4 frames I will vectorize them for $30,000.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2016 21:32
|
|