|
|
#
¿
Jan 22, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 18, 2024 18:54 |
|
|
 is the quiggy one as far as i'm concerned
|
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Smythe posted:its cool to think about that when that emotiocon was made the white pixel was, relatively, very large on our small monitors when it was realed 9999 years ago. Now, in 2016 our monitors are bigger and the pixels are smaller. Maybe soon, in the future, the pixels will be so small we wont even see the white pixel. someone needs to vectorize these emoticons for proper resolution independence on retina displays. future-proofing, people! for instance: 
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2016 20:06
|
|
|
Sereri posted:not animated, please revise im not a gif expert so it took me like 15 tries to get this animated right. interesting how the image is technically correct with the white part of the eyes in the sw quadrant, but visually correct when it's in the ne corner  
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Sham bam bamina! posted:the white part is the sclera, not a reflection ahhhhhh you're right. this way looks much better. thx  Fuzzy Mammal posted:ok now do the red one  
|
|
#
¿
May 30, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
imgur doesn't host svgs though. does SA embed them?
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 18, 2024 18:54 |
|
|
if lowtax pays me, let's say, a $5000 honorarium i'll go through and vectorize all the somethingawful smilies that are either non-animated or have <4 frames
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2016 18:47
|
|