|
Destroying everything is ineffecient. A global one child policy would allow for a gradual controlled population decline with retention of industrial capacity. The problem is then getting a big enough stick to compell the world to go along. But you wpuldn't have to use it so that means you could go crazy on that end.
|
#
¿
Jan 1, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 16:18 |
|
|
Geniasis posted:Yeah, the one child policy worked out real well for China. Real talk. Didn't it? They were all third world and now they are one of the global superpowers. Thanatosian posted:You would have to completely revamp the global financial system. It's reliant on having more young people working than old people not working. Is't that the point of the story anyways?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2016 12:47
|
|
|
blowfish posted:The pragmatic solution is to subsidise gay sex. This really is the best direction to take your story. It could be the next fifty shades of grey.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 04:37
|
|
|
GORDON posted:"Humans are the only animal with an unemployment rate." They need to pull their weight like hookworms or mosquitos. What do people they they are doing being paracites on society?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2016 03:50
|
|
|
GORDON posted:I have no idea what people think they are doing being paracites on society. Pedant. My point about economic production and actual utility being dissimilar stands.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2016 06:03
|
|