|
http://www.latimes.com/nation/immigration/la-na-ff-immigration-raids-20160103-story.htmlquote:In Norcross, Ga., on Saturday, Joanna Gutierrez said her niece and niece's 9-year-old son were taken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, who arrived in an unmarked car and presented Gutierrez with a warrant for a man she didn't know. So uh, any resident lawyers know what the rationale is for not needing a warrant? also quote:Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney in Atlanta, said what an unfortunate name
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 02:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 15, 2024 12:49 |
|
acejackson42 posted:That website would be so large and so absolutely convolutedly intermeshed that horrific screw-ups in code would result and it would automatically crash your browser, fry your motherboard and feces would spray from the headphones jack. Easily, he's not taking all of them and he should have done it sooner.
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 02:08 |
|
Berke Negri posted:They would still need a warrant to search a non-citizens home, which is moot anyways with the case here as unless I'm mistaken the home owner in this situation was a citizen, they were there for her niece. you would imagine they would need a warrant in pretty much every situation, but i am not a lawyer because no one should be
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 20:24 |
|
TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:
If you're consiering the warrant for someone completely unrelated, how exactly does that result in the extraction of two completely different people?
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 21:43 |
|
so basically its talked up as a deterrent to future people seeking asylum/immigration that would likely be denied due to fearing gang violence rather than explicitly government-based discrimination or action. im sure people fleeing for their lives would rather take a gamble than simply be killed by criminal gangs that are working in the absence of anything remotely resembling effective governance, so this seems pointless outside of political theatre
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 23:42 |