|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Yeah hahaha why would those refs want to try and nip escalation in the bud during this game They tried that before it did nothing so it was kind of pointless.
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 08:42 |
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:berfict's hit looked pretty bad though, the only unfortunate thing is there was no replay angle that actually showed the point of impact but it did look like the helmets collided regardless It was a actually shoulder to helmet but it was still bad.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
I feel bad for pac as he will be lumped in with Burlict which isn't fair at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Kalli posted:Was posted to the GDT: Yep no head to head but still drat.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
Robo-Pope posted:Watch the replay before that. He's walking Brown off the field, Burfict puts his hand on Brown's shoulder, and Porter justifiably gets in his face. I'm not sure exactly how he got surrounded by five Bengals, but he was minding his own business until Burfict physically engaged an injured player. To be fair it could just be Burlict feeling bad he almost murdered a dude.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
Moxie posted:He should probably wait until the guy regains his memory to apologize then No one accused him of being smart!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:19
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:Are you loving blind Nope it's shoulder to head which is still illegal, I think? It should be.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:22
|
|
|
v2vian man posted:that hit was only not head to head because he missed He did hit his head, I don't think he cares which part does it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
v2vian man posted:one of my favorite parts is that brown didn't even catch it. like that's an illegal hit if he does catch it, but he doesn't, and burfict can clearly see that, and he still takes the shot anyway This is what he does and the league refuses to do anything so they really shouldn't be surprised.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:31
|
|
|
Mughe posted:Mike Carey said it was legal (it wasn't). They then kept bringing up a legal sack trying desperately to find something wrong with it. Then Burlict went full Burlict.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:33
|
|
|
PsychoInternetHawk posted:I didn't see the fumble, did they botch the snap going for a kneel or actually try and run a play? If the former holy poo poo that's bad luck, if the latter lol they absolutely deserved to lose They had all three timeouts, running a play was the right call.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:34
|
|
|
People also shove people all the time without penalty so I can't give a gently caress about that. Also lol at punch.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:36
|
|
|
Intruder posted:He pretty clearly shoves Porter, your'e just being obstinate at this point A shove and a punch are very, very different.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:38
|
|
|
Intruder posted:But both would incur a penalty so it's a moot point Sometimes, not always.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
johnfw50 posted:He was out there talking to the player whose brain had just been turned to mush. Burfict touched the star player he knocked out. Porter took exception to that and got surrounded. Stop being a loving moron That is worse really.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:40
|
|
|
The pearl clutching in this thread is hilarious. Especially from Steelers fans.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:41
|
|
|
commieB posted:Talk poo poo get hit is common law You aren't even getting hit, you are just getting moved slightly.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:43
|
|
|
Schwack posted:Football Zebras says Joey Porter was allowed on the field, no flag for that. Lol so much for the paragon of virtue Joey Porter.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
Senordingdong posted:That says he was allowed to be there...?? Not his fault Bengals can't control themselves with a little poo poo talking. Nah people are pretending poor Joey was forced into this situation when the dude was looking for an opportunity.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:51
|
|
|
Pac man is a piece of poo poo but I am not going to let previous history cloud my judgment.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:54
|
|
|
Goetta posted:The flag was weak as poo poo It was OP
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
Drunk Nerds posted:I dont think they are. Personally, I think Porter knew he had a chance to goad several bengals into a penalty, and was totally baiting them. And it worked. Porter was slick. Well some are at least presenting it that way.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:00
|
|
|
To be honest that shows that the NFL has No real way to handle these types of problems if they come up.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:04
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:I mean you could eject guys but then you will fall into the same thing "The refs were biased and screwed us by throwing out so and so for just shoving a guy when shoves happen all the time etc etc" The NFL is terrified of ejecting players which is a problem. Burlict should have been ejected a long time ago. I mean the announcers were saying he was running around uncontrollably on the sideline. Trying to start fights.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:08
|
|
|
Quest For Glory II posted:if jones didn't respond to porter, another player would have. it was an intentional laying of bait for someone to take, in a SEA of bengals players. in that situation, i feel that offsetting unsportsmanlikes was the best way of defusing it It would have been, penalizing one but not the other is pouring gas on an open flame.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:14
|
|
|
Frackie Robinson posted:I'm saying that there's a stronger disincentive against escalating conflict or retaliating when each team has to worry about the possibility that they're going to be "unfairly" get the brunt of the punishment. If things are going to get called in a way such that they predictably balance out, then what reason do they have not to just act like maniacs? Weird I feel the exact opposite would happen.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:16
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:Because Burfict was touching Brown. I can't imagine anyone from the Steeler sideline was very thrilled with Burfict at that moment, and they probably weren't willing to accept it as a gesture of apology It's really unfair if this excuses Porters behavior.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:23
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:Joey Porter, secret ISIS leader, deserved a flag for not allowing Burfict to lay hands on the man whose brain he just liquefied. I agree with this Porter should not have involved himself at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:26
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:Would you be more okay with it if it was a steelers trainer who pushed Burfict's hand away? I honestly don't think anyone should have done anything there unless he sincerely believed Burlict was gonna murder him. Which is silly.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:29
|
|
|
sportsgenius86 posted:At some point, you have to realize that your opinions on Joey Porter's thing that he did mean absolutely loving nothing and he didn't violate any rules, right? Talking poo poo can violate the rules depending on how trigger happy the ref is. Unsportsmanlike conduct and all that. It's rather vague tho.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:31
|
|
|
Regnevelc posted:Yeah, because all of those matter in that specific moment. They have to or you look hypocritical.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:33
|
|
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Mr. Porter called me a poopyhead, sir. I had no choice but to fight through you and two of your peers to address his meanie words personally. You were wrong dude you don't get to be smug.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:34
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:now I ain't no big fancy lawyer type who can tell the difference between saying mean stuff and grabbing a person but that doesn't mean that *spits* I can't calls it likes I sees it There is effectively no difference between the two, neither cause physical harm by themselves. A punch on the other hand.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:36
|
|
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Lol please you could call that rule 100 times per game I'm sure if you wanted to be literal about it. You could yes that doesn't change anything.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:yes yes I see we should definitely say its cool to shove coaches just as long as you don't punch them I think you should treat it the same as poo poo talk, as I don't see any real difference between the two. It's not cool but context should matter. It definetly should not outrank poo poo talk for any reason.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:39
|
|
|
Cavauro posted:Please stop lying about what happened or i will gently caress your poo poo up, pretty bad. [posted vaguely to offend all sides' sensibilities] I will gently shove you fucker, I am hardcore!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:41
|
|
|
I will gently shove everyone in this threat, intimidating you into submission.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:42
|
|
|
WeLandedOnTheMoon! posted:Jones doesn't even make contact with Porter. You can see it in the clip. Jones also doesn't shove a ref. Jones throws a weak punch, but is pushed away by three refs. Look at jones being manhandled by those refs, he should sue!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:43
|
|
|
ALFbrot posted:So an attempted physical escalation that is physically prevented by the referees is an unwarranted flag? That is in line with how refs usually handle these situations. Like I said how the NFL handles this poo poo is loving stupid.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 08:42 |
|
|
v2vian man posted:dude...thats a former mod your talking too He has power man, not shoving power but close.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 07:49
|
|