|
snype
|
#
?
Jan 12, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
man echidnapenis is schooling you loving fools on compression
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
the goddamn spanx of yospos
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:except the offset as a variable may or may not require more data to be held than the data itself headshot by the echimeister
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:10
|
|
|
also the Intel thing has a microcode fix, update ur bios
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
how will jawnv6 excuse this one? i thought web developers were the only ones with lovely code.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:except the offset as a variable may or may not require more data to be held than the data itself well obviously you compress the variable by defining it by its own place in pi, and if that's still longer, you do it again, and again and again, and specify as a pi offset + a number of iterations duh
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
information theory works the same way
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:well obviously you compress the variable by defining it by its own place in pi, and if that's still longer, you do it again, and again and again, and specify as a pi offset + a number of iterations Check out the 710th digit of pi for what you need to understand this concept.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
what is that digit doing to its anus?!??!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:Check out the 710th digit of pi for what you need to understand this concept. jonny 290??
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
i'm position 15,773
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:36
|
|
|
oh man, i bet intel is going to make some wicked employee keychains from the defective units
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 02:52
|
|
|
Sagebrush posted:well obviously you compress the variable by defining it by its own place in pi, and if that's still longer, you do it again, and again and again, and specify as a pi offset + a number of iterations also have it reference an already compressed version of the data 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
why do we even have double? seems like a big problem!
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:13
|
|
|
duTrieux. posted:oh man, i bet intel is going to make some wicked employee keychains from the defective units it is fixed in a microcode update, there are no permanently bad parts.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
The Management posted:it is fixed in a microcode update, there are no permanently bad parts. You always get super defensive about Intel defects like when the tsx thing happened as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 03:47
|
|
|
emoji posted:You always get super defensive about Intel defects like when the tsx thing happened as well. poo poo, my cover is blown
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
another step on the path towards intels lovely chips bowing before the might of apple silicon
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 04:35
|
|
|
Intel: where quality is job 0.999! 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
did anyone say itanic yet
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:you can't prove this lol looks like someone doesn't know how the DMCA works.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 07:41
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:did anyone say itanic yet 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 07:42
|
|
|
apparently intel runs the cloud
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 16:35
|
|
|
i don't really use my computer for math so who cares
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:I would estimate that there are approximately a finite amount of numbers that we can discover. sure, but that's only because we will cease to exist at some point, not because the supply of large primes will be exhausted.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 18:22
|
|
|
computer toucher posted:sure, but that's only because we will cease to exist at some point, not because the supply of large primes will be exhausted. In what sense can a number be said to exist without a human to enumerate it. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
Salt Fish posted:In what sense can a number be said to exist without a human to enumerate it. In the same sense that there is at any given moment an exact amount of birds in flight in the skies of the world or grains of sand in all the beaches even though this exact number will forever elude us. We still know there is such a number.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 21:32
|
|
|
computer toucher posted:In the same sense that there is at any given moment an exact amount of birds in flight in the skies of the world or grains of sand in all the beaches even though this exact number will forever elude us. We still know there is such a number. Actually, there isn't. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
wheres the rest of the actual line or did they stop selling them altogether
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
bobbilljim posted:wheres the rest of the actual line or did they stop selling them altogether the chart was made in 2007. the last model was made in 2012, they're tied up in a patent fight atm
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
i like how the 2005-10 line takes the 2003 actual figure and assumes completely linear sales with no growth and they still missed it
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
itanium is bad lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 22:26
|
|
|
 i'm the POWER
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
suffix posted:it does one math and then it shits itself same 
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:
kind of a weird chart that doesn't count gpu power, i assume that's where most of the beef is these days
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:
I am both PA-RISC (RIP, too good, too pure) and the rapidly approaching SPARC renaissance
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 05:05
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:I am both PA-RISC (RIP, too good, too pure) and the rapidly approaching SPARC renaissance I will be nCube please. Sounds cool.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 09:16
|
|
|
suffix posted:kind of a weird chart that doesn't count gpu power, i assume that's where most of the beef is these days depends on the workload obvi but iirc top500 is only for cpu supercomputes?
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 11:44 |
|
|
duTrieux. posted:oh man, i bet intel is going to make some wicked employee keychains from the defective units secret santa gift 2016: wafer of defective core i7s
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 16:11
|
|