|
For once in my life, I am going to agree with SedanChair. (I know, the thought makes me hurt physically.) If you are seriously, unironically, suggesting euthanasia (or assisted suicide) as a solution to the problem of addiction, you are both not serious and an rear end in a top hat. A creepy, terrifying rear end in a top hat. I am not a fan of "just let addicts be addicted" - I don't think that's a viable option for society. But addiction is a (non-communicable) medical condition, and it is a short step from "kill the addicts" to "kill the mentally ill" or "kill the disabled".
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2016 11:44 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 09:14 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:That also touches on questions about do not resuscitate orders or people saying "just let me die." Some people argue that forcing medical care on somebody to save their life is the right thing to do as all life must be preserved at all costs. Assisted suicide is a biiit different from a DNR, ethically. In the former case (assisted suicide), you are explicitly telling the medical practitioner to administer or allow to be administered a medical procedure which would result in deliberate harm to the patient as the sole intended effect. That violates every bit of medical ethics there is, going all the way back to Hippocrates - or does "First, do no harm" mean nothing anymore? In the second case, it's the patient pre-emptively saying "I do not desire or consent to treatment". Much different.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2016 11:47 |