|
I have no doubt that opiates are the best option for some chronic pain patients, but I also have no doubt that they're not the best option for a lot of people who are taking that option. And that the pill mill closures are a good thing on the whole, even though things will probably have to get worse before they get better. Opiates are great for end-of-life stuff and (if you can shut the door) acute stuff. It's not really a bizarre mental block -- the efficacy/safety of other medicines for other conditions is a separate issue. You're right that opiates are actually pretty safe as long as you don't OD/mix with alcohol or benzos, don't infect yourself with a needle, etc. but addicts are at a risk for doing that and it's happening a lot. Not to mention just the usual non-health-related costs of addiction. I've seen you in addiction threads, before, I think? PRETTY sure you were an alcoholic, or addicted to something else, or at least were complaining about how the higher power part of AA was a dealbreaker for you at some point in the way distant past? Either way, you have to reconcile your personal struggle to get relief with the fact that some doctors were in fact pill mills and that people are in fact getting addicted. Well okay you don't have to reconcile anything you don't want to of course, I just mean as a society your story isn't the only one out there and policy has to reconcile these things.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2016 19:39 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 13:16 |
|
One thing that pretty consistently forks opinion in people by the way is if you have visibility into (say) a well-run pain center versus if you have visibility into addiction/treatment centers. I have a lot more of the latter and a lot of people there think doctors are just total loving idiots with the opiate scripts, though it has gotten better.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2016 19:44 |
|
Toasticle posted:Alcohol and I guess nicotine are the only two drugs I have problems stopping, haven't had a drink in 10 years at least. The fact that they are legal just makes it that much more depressing. And I've done quite a few other drugs. http://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/overdose-death-rates pangstrom fucked around with this message at 02:35 on Jan 26, 2016 |
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 02:32 |
|
If a more treatment-based approach emerges because it's white people now and the government isn't as dumb about this issue now then great. Obviously it's not ideal and it doesn't always or even often go this way, but a lot of former-addicts say jail was the best thing to happen to them. Right now the "kinder" approach has been to clamp down on prescription abuse, and while I am for that and I'm sure some other former-addicts say THAT was the best thing to happen to them it's just going to make a lot of addicts hustle harder or turn to heroin.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 13:10 |
|
Is there a story where for some (say, emergency) surgery the anesthetic didn't work because the patient was an opioid addict? It seems like that would happen.
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 13:28 |
|
Mercury_Storm posted:If so I wonder how the main subject in the doc is coping now. http://www.nopetaskforce.org/memorial.php?id=557
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 13:50 |
|
Ytlaya posted:This kind of scares the poo poo out of me as someone on suboxone (which not only gives you a tolerance to opiates, but actively blocks other opiates). While I carry a card in my wallet that is intended to notify people of this, the amount of opiates that would be required to be effective is so huge that I imagine doctors would be hesitant to use them even if they knew about the suboxone. I just try not to think about how hosed I would be if I got in a serious car accident or something. http://suboxonetalkzone.com/im-on-suboxone-can-i-have-surgery/
|
# ¿ Jan 26, 2016 19:28 |
|
Hardawn posted:I've been on suboxone/zubsolv for almost three years and I loving hate it. I'm such a fool for listening to my brother and the super nice doctor he worked with to bump me up the waiting list to be one of the 100 patients he could prescribe buprenorphine/naloxone to. I only stayed in rehab for 9 days before my insurance denied the claim, stating "me being there wasn't a necessity" even though I had a needle habit for 13 months and a nasal habit for a year and a half before. Maybe somebody can give a better summary, but for people who don't know much about this: With opiates there is an abstinence school of thought--Dr. Drew is probably the most visible face of this--and then there is a harm reduction school of thought. Well some of the harm reduction stuff is uncontroversial (giving needles etc.), but the place where they diverge is the maintenance drugs like methadone and suboxone. It's mostly a high risk/reward and high investment (abstinence) vs. a safer but less-ideal outcome (maintenance) issue. Even Dr. Drew thinks that people with awful problems and complicating factors should consider maintenance, or at least he does now that a bunch of his former patients are dead. On the other hand, maintenance drugs can be seen as a little "expedient" from the practitioner's or the system's standpoint, sort of a like a battlefield surgeon who just amputates limbs. There is a good chunk of harm reduction practitioners who wouldn't give those drugs to their own kid if the kid was in the same situation as Hardawn was, is what I'm saying.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 13:05 |
|
Vancouver is trying something similar. Maybe Canada and Europe can figure it out so that it works so well the US can come up with enough cover / attitudes can change enough to do something similar here. The success of the taper is the hard part... like if you're a betting man and somebody says they're starting to taper, put your money on relapse.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 13:33 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Definitely, it's not easy. But the raw stats from John Marks's study shows that a generous compassionate heroin maintenance has better outcomes than other opioid maintenance while reducing ODs, drug dealing, gang violence, theft and robbery, and HIV transmission.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 13:59 |
|
Reading his first 20ish posts in that thread (which is really good) I was pretty surprised when I clicked on his profile to see he's still posting, or at least was as of a few weeks ago. Opiate addict who is not a fan of rehab and is white-knuckling after getting out of prison, that's what people call a bad fact pattern. edit: Okay should have actually read a few posts further back, sorry, seems like he's okay at least. pangstrom fucked around with this message at 19:14 on Jan 29, 2016 |
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 19:02 |
|
the great deceiver posted:I was a heroin/opiate addict for almost a decade and ended up doing 3 years in federal prison for dealing. Rehab was worthless and 12-step programs were a crock of poo poo. I've been off dope for almost 4 years now and I hate to say it but what turned me around was going to prison. Weldon Pemberton posted:Another new documentary that focuses on fentanyl prescriptions for non-cancer patients and street heroin cut with fentanyl. Around the middle, it goes into some of the scummy practices used by companies like Insys to get people with mild pain using their product. They had someone who was told to say "uh huh" on the phone to insurance companies when asked if the patient had cancer, the only disease that guaranteed it would be covered, because "uh huh" doesn't count as "yes" and they couldn't be held liable. Another company put out an ad with an old man sucking on a fentanyl lollipop like it's no big deal and was forced to pay out millions of dollars.
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2016 19:43 |
|
I mean, social services are going to be basically treatment. When I hear that stuff sucks the next question is "was this voluntary and how much were you invested" because if not yeah that's a tough putt even if most addicts were not some flavor of antisocial, though I'm interested to hear what you didn't like about them. A lot of programs aren't great. Thread-relevant news http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/obama-asks-for-1-1-billion-to-fight-opioid-and-heroin-abuse/
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2016 18:12 |
|
the great deceiver posted:I'm not saying they don't work at all but they definitely don't work for some people. They take a very cult-like approach towards the whole issue, basically saying that they are the only way to get clean and if you leave you'll be back on the streets using. If you're not using and aren't in meetings they say you are a "dry drunk" and it's just a matter of time until you use again. I left and have been off dope for almost 4 years. They honestly feel like a relic of a time when society did not understand addiction at all, mostly because that's exactly what they are. There is a notion out there that a lot of "real" addicts have a gnawing something that, once it's consistently fed, never goes away solely by dint of not feeding it. It's unclear to me if the "real" addict distinction is a convenient post hoc thing, but the place I do go to the mat for the AAs and rehabs etc. is the reason a lot of people complain about it is IMO exactly why they could benefit from it. They need to get over themselves, not in like an adolescent shoulder-shruggy way but in a fundamental way where they can rebuild the capacity to regulate their emotions and have relationships with other people. It's going to be uncomfortable and social stuff always has some hokey kayfabe attached and yes, there is an underlying assumption that the people walking in the door could use some improvement. If you feel good in your own skin and have good friends and aren't using then by all means skip it.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2016 13:17 |
|
An LA-area doctor who was egregious about profiting off pill prescriptions (knew her patients were addicts or dealers, had people travelling to come to her, helped work the system to get people pills, got calls from the coroner, etc.) got sentenced to 30 years. http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-doctor-murder-overdose-drugs-sentencing-20160205-story.html
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2016 14:39 |
|
I haven't watched the new frontline yet, but I will when I get a chance http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/chasing-heroin/ Ytlaya posted:Zero impairment in terms of ability to function or think or anything like that. I think that most people who are predisposed to becoming opiate addicts tend to not be very impaired by them unless they take huge doses (for example, I've never had some of the symptoms, like nausea, that other people mention on opiates, even before becoming addicted). But I feel zero excitement or enjoyment or anything like that on suboxone. It's like my brain doesn't produce much dopamine anymore or something.
|
# ¿ Feb 29, 2016 14:07 |
|
With the AA group stuff you can usually find an OK group if you are in a medium sized town... maybe a large sized town if you are in an area full of folks with worldviews opposed to yours. To pile on a little, though, a lot of groups are toxic not for philosophical reasons but just for generic semi-leaderless group psychological reasons. They get a few strong and terrible personalities who are know-it-alls or 13th steppers (hit on new members) or whatever else.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 01:19 |
|
Posters can do what they want of course but I humbly suggest skipping over the MIGF posts and the social cleansing talk. CDC released some guidelines, which I haven't read yet, but from the article gist they sound reasonable to me. For other opinions you can see the comments! http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/health/cdc-opioid-guidelines.html
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 19:56 |
|
I don't think they're off the table, they just aren't the first thing on the table. Agree that this is bad news for people for whom all-told it's the least bad option but, again, for every one of those stories there are a lot of a different story and ultimately it's hard to tell which person is which story, and even those people have friends and family and live in the society with everyone else. I totally agree with that categorical statement re: chronic pain outside of the usual caveats. It really should be the last-resort option there, and if you have a better objective summary of available evidence feel free to lay it on us.
pangstrom fucked around with this message at 19:57 on Mar 16, 2016 |
# ¿ Mar 16, 2016 14:40 |
|
Seems like the H-Bomb is moving aside for the F-Bomb with all the Fentanyl deaths.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 21:38 |
|
On some podcast Tom Arnold mentioned he got in a motorcycle accident and while he was lying on the highway with a broken back his first thought was "sweet, I'm going to get morphine." And IIRC correctly he was in recovery for cocaine at the time and had just started/was in denial about the opiates. Pretty tough putt for the heath care provider when that's what's coming in the door.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2016 14:48 |
|
This is going to vary by situation and the doctor, but how often do you suspect the person is an addict, how often are you like pretty sure, and how often are you basically positive? Also, it's a small thing and I roll my eyes a little when people talk about stigma as like a primary cause of addiction but I want to just protest "love to" in front of the "game the system". You already know this since you're talking about projecting etc., but a lot of people don't get that addicts are capital-D Desperate and their thinking is broken. They're going after drugs like a starving person would be after food, eating rotten rats, etc. It doesn't make them noble or anything but they're not trying to get one over you, and it's AT BEST a huge hassle, but they're just doing what they do.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2016 15:38 |
|
Yeah I think it's more a function of there not being other potent opiate options in Russia, though the situation may have changed I don't know.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2016 20:30 |
|
Just as an aside and not disagreeing with anyone, but I think a lot of folks (esp. young guys) don't understand how important social support/influence is to humans, or at least neurotypical humans. Also GIVING social support, which really turns a light on for some people. We mostly buy that, say, solitary confinement would be rough but when it comes to meaningful interaction a lot of people are basically walking around in solitary confinement.
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2016 16:36 |
|
I can envision a treatment with a high chance of success (outside of the people where it's REALLY progressed, I guess) if you could limit the inpatients to people who have decided they really want to get better and are willing to change/let go. But yeah that's sort of like saying I can cook a delicious dinner as long as the guests are starving. It's going to be a 2 way thing for the foreseeable future; there isn't a FO4 addictol on the horizon.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 01:01 |
|
Every country sees way less opioid abuse than America but we're starting to get our act together. It will get worse (or at least stay really bad) before it gets better, though.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2016 03:33 |
|
It's a troll folks, use the ignore feature it's not that hard.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2016 18:01 |
|
Frontline has a nice "storycorps-lite" kind of thing that is an interesting read http://apps.frontline.org/heroin-stories/
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 16:20 |
|
Albino Squirrel what proportion of your maintenance patients would you estimate have gotten off opiates, sub-setting however you want to (within X years, or among those who really wanted to, etc.)?
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2016 23:30 |
|
Looking like opiates probably played a role in Prince's death.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2016 13:41 |
|
I mean, it's a legitimate risk in the abstract but addicts are already dropping left and right once they touch fentanyl so I don't know if W-18 floating around really changes much in practice.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2016 14:55 |
|
Yeah, sorry. Maybe somebody can spell out the specifics with data, but the deaths usually involve taking other depressants (esp. bezos) or, less commonly, just taking too much, either because there is fentanyl in it and/or because it's a relapsing and tolerance is down and/or because they just push it.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2016 14:58 |
|
The "this life" podcast (Dr. Drew, Bob Forrest) had Bruce Heischober as a guest and the first half they talked about the practical factors involved with opiates and the healthcare system. They have a range of opinions and experiences and it was interesting. http://podbay.fm/show/1058592078/e/1463424987 The second half is less thread-relevant and more about Carolla-land.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 14:53 |
|
My friend is a psychiatrist and multiple well-to-do parents of his son's friends have broached the topic with him; he says usually they start with a "kidding" move and then a less kidding question. He just says "I don't prescribe opiates" pre-emptively now .
|
# ¿ May 28, 2016 18:30 |
|
PT6A posted:Why would a psychiatrist prescribe opiates? Or do you mean as part of a treatment program for someone who's already addicted?
|
# ¿ May 29, 2016 01:22 |
|
He was just MIGFing. Short of real smoking gun negligence evidence--which you aren't going to get out of a celebrity bunker often--opiates for chronic pain, while a demonstrably bad option, isn't itself illegal. Edit: didn't know it was fentanyl, that's more egregious but not sure if that's beyond the pale legally speaking or not. pangstrom fucked around with this message at 13:30 on Jun 3, 2016 |
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 12:44 |
|
Sounds great but so far the doctors who have gone to jail for opiate prescriptions are Dr. Tseng and... nobody else as far as I know.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 15:00 |
|
Well 50ish people a die a day in the US from opiate ODs so without evidence that he was awful beyond what we already know I'm not going to bet that Prince's doctor is going to be the second drop. It seems Prince was less a "junkie" and more backed into it later in life with chronic hip pain. Those stories can and often do end the same way but that's a lot more cover for his doctor.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 15:24 |
|
Total aside, but there is a pattern in people with relatively "good sobriety" (in AA parlance) where if they relapse with a different drug it's in part because they tell themselves "well I'm not a <different drug> guy I'm a <drug I had a problem with> guy." Total aside because if a drug does nothing for you it does nothing for you, not calling that into question.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 16:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 13:16 |
|
Yeah oxy was similarly pitched as a "less addictive opiate", and a bunch of new opiate drugs or drug combos are abuse resistant, and there's the anti constipation Super Bowl ad etc. For profit pharma isn't always going in a great direction.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2016 22:44 |