|
Cohan wrote this piece back in 2012 on why the Dodd Frank and the Volcker Rule couldn't theoretically protect us from another banking crisis:How We Got the Crash Wrong posted:ONE OF THE most seductive narratives about the recent financial crisis is that it was caused by dizzying increases in the amount of leverage on the balance sheets of Wall Street firms, leaving the financial system virtually no margin for error. Leverage, we’ve been told repeatedly, went from about 12-to-1 in 2004 to 33-to-1 in 2008. (Leverage is the ratio of debt or assets to equity; at 33-to-1 leverage, a mere 3 percent drop in the value of a firm’s assets can wipe out its equity.) The reason for the increase, so the story goes, was an underappreciated change, in April 2004, to an obscure Securities and Exchange Commission rule, which let Wall Street off its short leash and allowed unprecedented risk-taking. If not for that, according to the popular press and many accomplished scholars, the crisis might not have happened. The acceptance of this thesis has colored not only how we think about what happened but also the new laws that were designed to prevent the next crisis. The problem is, it’s flat wrong. And because we have misunderstood the facts, we may now be trying to cure the wrong disease.
|
# ¿ Jan 21, 2016 17:07 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 19:27 |
|
That lecture is fantastic. Thanks for linking it.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2016 01:20 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:Hundred years ago, what was the currency they used in Luxembourg? Plenty of countries in Europe are older than the United States (most of them are even!). A nation isn't just a party and its government.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 08:42 |
|
Bip Roberts posted:Besides the UK which ones had remotely continuous governance? I'm arguing that most identify as being French, not citizens of the Third Republic or some poo poo. People don't view their nationalities by whatever their current government is. That's a uniquely American thing going.
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 21:45 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:One of the big issues with the housing market is that developers always think "what will make me the most money?" and luxury *thing* is what they tend to go to. This is why you have so drat many empty McMansions in America right now. The target market is always suburban white people with money. It also doesn't help that people living in areas where stuff that gets developed absolutely do not want low-income or affordable housing to go up because those people come with it. Not to mention that banks actively withhold houses from the market to cut off supply and jack up prices even further.
|
# ¿ Feb 12, 2016 22:32 |
|
Why are Sweden, Switzerland, and Denmark running higher negative interest rates than the Eurozone?
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2016 17:05 |
|
icantfindaname posted:Well, I will say that after witnessing liberals and Democrats play down and ignore the inequality issue, seeing a purestrain Republican "poor people have refrigerators! refrigerators didn't even exist 200 years ago!" is refreshing in a weird way Did anyone really think liberals were anything but capitalists? Forget even the neoliberal label. They are pro free market through and through.
|
# ¿ Aug 18, 2016 17:57 |
|
override367 posted:An economic crisis will give Trump the excuse to just eliminate the income tax, medicare, medicaid, social security, and the VA He is going to do this regardless
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2016 02:48 |
|
DeathSandwich posted:I'm not real super familiar on the Italian situation: Is the bank just extremely over-leveraged or is there some sort of cash flow problem for the country? Almost all of the major European banks are hilariously over leveraged and are doing their best to sweep it under the rug and hope the public doesn't notice
|
# ¿ Dec 5, 2016 14:48 |
|
If anything, the healthcare industry in the US is grossly oversized. Last time I was in the ER overnight in this massive hospital I was its only there and all the other patient rooms were empty.
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 14:10 |
|
They will cure the Chinese market with TCM
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2017 01:01 |
|
Orange Devil posted:Capitalism is a woefully inefficient economic system for improving human lives. Though I will concede it is better than slavery and feudalism. Dude your typical farmer peasant in England during the middle ages had more free time to the point England started drafting specific laws later on to keep them working Also lol save the healthcare talk until after the GOP kills off its own fanbase after repealing Obamacare
|
# ¿ Jan 8, 2017 16:37 |
|
Before capitalism came along the poor weren't so wholly subservient to a the higher economic classes since subsistence was still a thing. Look at Alexander II's land reforms in Ukraine.
|
# ¿ Jan 8, 2017 17:12 |
|
Trump's supporters don't get to bitch about global free trade because they consecutively voted in the last 4-5 pro-NAFTA presidents and all the necessary congressmen/senators who legislated it.
|
# ¿ Jan 12, 2017 16:29 |
|
Helsing posted:That's what is so frustrating about Obama. The Bush administration fully revealed just how empty the ideals of "pragmatic" centrism had become. The Iraq War and the financial crisis were the symptoms of an extremely damaged and unstable political system that was in desperate need of repair. We desperately needed some kind of new vision from the left or at least the liberal side of the spectrum eight years ago when it could have done some good. But Obama doubled down on a failed ideology at exactly the moment that it's failures had been plainly revealed and we're all going to pay the price for that now. I don’t think he or anyone else realized the GOP was radicalized right under their noses. Both Clinton and Jeb! campaigned on courting Bush and HW Bush Republicans. Too bad that wasn’t the makeup of the party. They saw their repeated failures on the national level (with McCain and Romney) as an excuse to slide further right. The Koch brothers came in and astroturfed the poo poo out of the movement, Fox News was there with completely unhinged hosts who had no idea what kind of damage they were doing (Glenn Beck running around calling for some kind of national unity), and the senators/congressmen in Washington were selling their voters a kind of fiction where shutting down the government and repealing Obamacare were feasible without burning bridges. In truth part of this was how our government was designed. The President and congress fighting over authority is as old as time itself. But that said, of course all of this was extremely divisive in the long run, which is why Trump voters now get the idea that they’re going to be able to bring about healing going forward instead of the country being effectively split into two. The level of escapism is dangerous here. Trump and his supporters cannot say the truth because that reality is a dangerous one for them and pretty much everyone else. A civil war is upon us if the economy crashes. Dead Cosmonaut fucked around with this message at 00:45 on Jan 29, 2017 |
# ¿ Jan 29, 2017 00:42 |
|
Had any of the optimization theory the Soviets painstakingly developed been applied through computing, the Soviet Union would have fixed a good deal of its problems.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2017 11:11 |
|
caps on caps on caps posted:It's entirely feasible to think about the optimization problem a planned economy has to solve. It's well known that, with stable preferences, solving the problem for just one market alone is hard enough that we can not realistically do it with computers. But an economy is not a static problem in a single market. The funny thing is that a good deal of trading that goes on at Wall St. is now automated, using the same theory the Soviets developed.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2017 18:10 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 19:27 |
|
OhFunny posted:https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-02-28/ryan-said-to-forge-unexpected-alliance-with-bannon-on-border-tax The only way Trump gets his way is if the use withdraws from the WTO. Global trade isn’t going to end if he does that. It just means that all of our influence on the global economy goes to either Europe or China.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2017 12:53 |