|
Helsing posted:If globalization had been implemented in the way it was sold -- with wealth redistribution mitigating the painful economic restructuring triggered by changing trade patterns -- then this backlash wouldn't be threatening the world economy right now. Unfortunately these globalizing policies were intentionally implemented in such a way as to crush the labour movement and win domestic political battles, which triggered a massive expansion in corporate power and skyrocketing economic inequality. This pathetic attempt to retrospectively justify the breaking of the social compact between labour and capital by appealing to the welfare of Chinese workers is disingenuous and just emphasises how much liberalism failed in its own self-stated goals of improving everyone's living standards. If your ideology hadn't willing allowed itself to be conscripted into a domestic battle between labour and capital then it wouldn't have discredited itself in this way and it wouldn't have prompted such a vicious backlash. It's pathetic that you're now trying to redirect blame elsewhere. Let's say what we're all thinking. Which countries are invariably brought up as the ideals of progressive governance? Kingdoms, my friends, good and proper kingdoms. I'm not saying we didn't have a good run. In 1776, it probably even made a lot of sense. But today, it's time to call the Republican experiment quits, and once more embrace full monarchism. In fact, capitalism and communism are in fact both not-even-wrong ideologies that failed and died long ago, and we all live in their decaying ruins. Fascism doesn't need to be given the time of day, obviously. Hence, my friends, absent a method for reaching stable anarchist governance, that really only leaves one obtainable form of government, one shared by such glorious nations as Denmark, The Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and Canada. It's up to the modern pragmatic progressive to bend a knee and subject themselves to the authority of good and proper Crown rule once again. For King and Country, comrades.
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 12:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 19:26 |
|
NO
|
# ¿ Feb 6, 2017 13:44 |