Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Ormi
Feb 7, 2005

B-E-H-A-V-E
Arrest us!

TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:

Yes OP, after statistical controls are performed the gap disappears. Problem is there are lots of poorly designed studies that fail to do this which is why you still hear about it.

A common meme foisted around the Internet by the academically illiterate. When pressed for sources, they invariably link to something like the Bush admin. CONSAD study, which admits that even after all feasible statistical controls are applied, roughly a third of the gap persists. That's just raw discrimination, it still leaves open the questions of the social pressures women face that lead them into lower paying career decisions and if we can do anything about them.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Ormi
Feb 7, 2005

B-E-H-A-V-E
Arrest us!
Employers do rationally exploit the wage gap, though, and this isn't contingent on all women being paid 22% less in all occupations. The gap wouldn't exist if they didn't, but it's likely fewer women would be hired in such a situation and we would have a workforce participation problem instead. The issue at hand for feminists is gender imbalances in different occupational fields, not the existence of lower paying jobs (though that is worth looking into, as has been discussed on the previous page).

Ormi fucked around with this message at 17:58 on Feb 1, 2016

  • Locked thread