Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
How many quarters after Q1 2016 till Marissa Mayer is unemployed?
1 or fewer
2
4
Her job is guaranteed; what are you even talking about?
View Results
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Double Bill posted:

So what happens when some of the trucks are left behind in traffic lights? Or will they just ignore them

They count as a convoy probably so if it's green for the first one it's green for all of them

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

jre posted:

If you've not posted a profit after 10 years and are losing half a billion in the last year alone the outlook is not so good

tell that to amazon

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
my current employer is preparing to do an IPO with almost half a billion dollar in volume this month and still isn't profitable. Looking forward to see how much my shares are actually worth in a few months.
Not sure if we are still considered a unicorn though.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

nm posted:


If everyone just copy pasted California we'd all be better off.

Fixed

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
"Approximately 90% of our users have not been hacked ".
Wow that's great

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
I guess that's the perfect moment to close this thread now

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Hey guys, look at me being smarter than amazon! I already figured out what will work and what won't, so don't even bother trying.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Tars Tarkas posted:

CloudPets, which makes an Internet of Things teddy bear that lets you send audio messaged to your child and vice versa, stored all those audio messages online using MongoDB without needing proper authentication to access it. People try to contact CloudPets multiple times and are ignored, then the database gets hacked and everything is put up for ransom like a lot of other databases were recently.

https://www.troyhunt.com/data-from-connected-cloudpets-teddy-bears-leaked-and-ransomed-exposing-kids-voice-messages/

The article is inaccurate. The toy is illegal in Germany because it is a camouflaged surveillance system. Nothing to do with security and kids.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Omg are we back to automated cars?? gently caress

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

a foolish pianist posted:

I'm a machine learning phd, and my title is developer.
Those are the worst kind of developers

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Yeah with my debit card I just click a button and I get my money back. Dunno how a credit card can make that any easier.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

skull mask mcgee posted:

still makes you an rear end in a top hat if you don't tip

Or poor. But maybe that's the same to you.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Neon Noodle posted:

The GitHub thing is particularly galling because they hired her for the express purpose of listening to her input on inclusion/emotional work environment issues. They sought her out in the knowledge that she's an activist, she initially balked at the offer until they made the case that they were working on their corporate culture. They reached out to her for that specific reason. And then they hosed her over when she expressed opinions and tried to influence the culture in ways that she thought were more sensitive to the experiences of: women, trans women, people dealing with mental illness, etc.

Many of us (women/LGBT/disabled/etc) feel as if we cannot be permitted to contribute to the industry and to open source culture because of the covert and overt hostility of those who call the shots. The standard response to this problem from the tech world is to shrug and just say, effectively, if you can't stand the heat, get back in the kitchen.

The relative absence of women, queer people, people of color, disabled people, and any other marginalized people in tech IS A PROBLEM. One of the causes of that problem is the tone deafness of the geek powers that be. The self-justifying, hollow ideology of "meritocracy".

Well we are only getting her side of the story in that article.
And her article gives the strong impression that she was the only one affected and not the rest of the team that is just as diverse as she is. Combined with the rest of her website that makes her seem like a person that is unpleasant to be around, I believe in this case it actually is more of a personal problem rather than a cultural problem.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

You know sexist pricks have said that in response to every article about sexism since time immemorial, right? You know what the other side's gonna be? "Nuh uh, she deserved it." And then you'll go "see, she deserved it." There's always an excuse to defend the status quo if that's what's most important to you.

Well my argument is that even her side of the story strongly indicates she was the problem.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

BarbarianElephant posted:

This is why Silicon Valley is so hostile to anyone "different" - they don't fit in effortlessly, so it's easier not to try. Unity through everyone being kinda similar.

Well the rest of the team ("5 women and one man: two of us trans, three women of color") didn't seem to face any issues, even though it was just as "different".

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Yeah I'm referring to a team (and rests of them) as "it", I hope that's still correct and okay to do. :(

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

Ah yeah, collective nouns can be tricky. The rest of her team weren't hired to be diversity activists though.
Yes, it was the entire team's mission.

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

And again, your criticisms of her are absolutely boilerplate and you'll never find a single story about sexism that doesn't have somebody responding exactly like you did. Everybody who ever has something bad happen to them deserved it, because the world is Just.
And that's not something anybody in this thread claimed.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

It's the underlying motivation for doing the knee-jerk response, dummy. I know you think you're a special unique snowflake and nothing you think could ever come from indoctrinated bias, but there's a reason somebody like you says exactly what you said every single time a woman complains about sexism, and it's not because you're all really cool observant guys who know what's what.

"That cop shooting victim was no angel" -- Denny

Please leave your assumptions and bias out of this, you don't really know anything about me :(
For the record, I don't doubt that github in terms of inclusion is way below industry average (and that average is pretty terrible to begin with). I also have no doubts that Susan Fowler's article on Uber is accurate and I haven't used Uber ever since (and I know that that's not really sufficient activism on my part). I also don't think Coraline Ehmke is dishonest or intentionally misleading anybody.
While Susan Fowler shows systemic discrimination not just against her but female engineers as a group at uber, Coraline almost exclusively talks about injustices against her as a person. Her team's work wasn't brought up once after its brief introduction - though its mission should have involved the whole team front and center.

What was the "Community & Safety" doing during all those incidents? Did Coraline ever bring up her concerns with the team? Was the team's reaction not adequate? Then that should have been mentioned in the blog article as well. Or was the team's reaction silenced by upper management? Again, something for the article.

The way it reads now it seems like the Community & Safety team abandoned her and I am curious to hear the story from that team.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Tiny Brontosaurus posted:

Oh you poor baby. What I know about you is that you made a boilerplate response to an article about sexism, which feels sufficient for criticizing the fact that you made a boilerplate response to an article about sexism. You think if I knew you volunteered at your church or were really into hiking or something that that would change the fact that you did that?

If you don't like being criticized for sexist behavior don't behave in a sexist way. You're a Just World fan, this should make sense to you.

I am sorry if my initial response sounded like one of those boilerplate excuses. The point I was trying to make originally - with a bad choice of words - is that apart from her personal telling of the story I would also like to hear the stance of the team she was in (even though we'll probably never get a word from them). The way it sounds right now it seems her own team failed her spectacularly which I hope is not true.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

A big flaming stink posted:

how the christ did soundcloud stay operational for this long while having to host a goddamn petabyte

I am sure they had the $100k they need for that. The twitter guy is taking out of his rear end.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
The search continues for a new CEO, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, general counsel, and independent board chair.

Lol well good luck

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

DC Murderverse posted:

I think literally the entire world would be better off if the government nationalized Twitter and ran it with a very strong hand towards online harassment and monitoring of fake accounts/information in exchange for actually being subject to freedom of speech laws (instead of people just thinking that they have to respect speech despite being a private loving business). It's a solid model that doesn't really lend itself to monetization, and I think literally anyone other than the people in charge now would do a better job of running the poo poo awful people off of it.

with the exception, of course, of the people in charge of our government right now, which is why this would never happen

Yes it's a fabulous idea to put a world wide user service into the hands of a single government, especially into one from such an irresponsible nation. (Also applies re: google and Facebook)

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
I founded a startup that basically is an app that decides who is right in internet discussions (so more or less Uber for Arguments). We are using advanced deep learning neural network artificial intelligences that determine which position in the argument is the correct one and then don't stop posting until every participant in the discussion has been convinced.
This thread usually serves as our test and training ground for new versions of the app. Sometimes those different versions of our app arrive at different conclusions regarding self driving cars which usually doesn't end well, but as long as VC is giving us money we'll continue.

Our end goal is to make internet discussions useless since you can and should instead just ask our app what your opinion regarding a specific topic should be.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

That's not how French works. Or maybe that's the joke? Dunno.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

actionjackson posted:

Friend of mine and SV techbro after mentioning to him how bad Uber is with all the culture poo poo

"I don't support them. I just use their services."

:wtc:

It seems like everyone has rose colored glasses on. Guess they don't want to attack the golden goose.

By using Uber you are making them lose more money so I guess it could be interpreted as a good thing.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Last year in this thread we argued whether self driving cars are a realistic thing in 15-20 years, now we are arguing whether they’re a realistic thing in three to five years, sounds like progress to me.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Remember the great success that fitbit was? Now you can invest your millions into Fitbark. It's like fitbit, but for dogs!

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

nm posted:

Not to get into a derail, but "dude" is basically gender neutral among californians under 40.

I refuse to believe that "I had sex with two dudes last night" could refer to someone having had sex with two women. Even in California.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

australiar posted:

this is great because one of my pet projects that i want to somehow get funded someday is training crows to kill cane toads

the cane toad has devastated australia because it's feral, it breeds uncontrollably, it eats any frog smaller than itself (so, all our frogs), and it's so poisonous that predators eat one and die, which is wiping out all our native predators. but the native crow has learnt that if it flips the toad over and eats only the guts, it gets a delicious meal and survives. (the toad's poison glands are on its back.) some crow families have learnt this strategy all by themselves, so all we need to do is teach it to a few generations that haven't and rewild them so they can teach their own chicks and lo: an anti-toad crow army

Australia 2025: gently caress, there's crows everywhere, what do we do about them

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Yak Shaves Dot Com posted:

Bringing it back around, can you imagine someone born and raised in space trying to make policy or services for someone living planetside, given the myopic worldview we see coming out of the Valley? Holy poo poo.

"How can they have to deal with traffic jams? Can't they just push around one another? They have to eat that unnutritional non-soylent dirtfood, no wonder they're all so stupid."

"What, they're just flushing their pee down the drain? Don't they know you can still drink that stuff?"

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

isn't Uber basically an accidentally socialist company? Since they are still losing billions every quarter, they are redistributing money from venture capitalists and stockholders to their employees and drivers. Every time you book an uber ride, an investor loses money.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
Speaking of unicorns, deliveroos IPO is taking a huge nosedive lol

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
startup working on an AI trained to write smut: https://www.talkdirty.ai/

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003
The people complaining about all their data being the cloud or every device being smart and talking to the internet are usually not the savvy ones, they're just the ones that would like to think they're savvy

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

CellBlock posted:

We're in the home stretch of having Metro to Dulles here in NoVA! That's only been in the works for...

Well, looking at the website, there were plans for a monorail from Georgetown to the airport in 1962, so 50 years?

Our city just started constructing its eighth subway line, 50km long, entirely underground, with over 30 stops. To be finished in 2030.

Must suck to live in the US

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Arivia posted:

Fixed that for you.

Nah white people are too expensive, he'll keep the ones from poorer countries that are easier to exploit

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Morrow posted:

It's going to their personal email... because they're going to immediately get frozen out. With no opportunity or incentive to pass on any individual knowledge.

The living will envy the dead.

Isn't that standard practice for layoffs

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

LittleFuryThings posted:

We are in the group stage. Resources will be more taxed in the knockout round and later matches, so still a chance!

Eh it's not like someone has to manually turn a crank to keep twitter running, I assume it can run unsupervised for a while.

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Mega Comrade posted:

Bitwarden also does this though?

Couple of reasons.
- Not locked into one browser.
- Will work with stuff outside the browser such as games and apps etc
- Can save things like notes, recovery keys etc
- Often have built in security checks, ie bitwarden will warn me if a password has turned up in a breach or if a website I have a password for has been compromised.
- Chromes (and to be fair all browsers) password generation is also poor compared to dedicated services, you have little control over the length or what things are included. Password require specific characters? well tough, chrome wont do that for you.
- Its also not as secure. If someone has access to your browser, they have access to your entire list of passwords. With password managers, unless you intentionally tell it not to auto signout it will, this ads an extra layer of security.

But the Google password manager does all that?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

BabyFur Denny
Mar 18, 2003

Mega Comrade posted:

It's literally part of Chrome, so it fails on the first item on my list...

Maybe it's improved since I last used it but how do I manually generate a password to use in an app? First thing I'm trying and either it can't do that or I can't find it.

Where are the rest of the features you said exist? I'm trying this on android and so far I've seen the security breach one which is nice, but most the other seem to be missing still.


Look if you want to use Google's solution then go for it. It seems 'fine' but there is a reason that companies like mine ban browser password managers from use and require password managers like bitwarden/1Password.

It's not just part of chrome. I don't know what exactly you're doing wrong but it has no problems generating, storing and auto filling app passwords for me. The password manager also requires additional authentication to retrieve your password store.

It works just fine and tbh I trust google way more to keep my things secure than LastPass/1password and co.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply