|
mdemone posted:She really does have an awesome ability to pull the funniest faces for the camera. I love that photo of her with the Millennials in the cafe even if I'd be the smirking dude in the middle
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jun 2, 2024 03:20 |
|
|
can I just say that I loving love living in a state with vote by mail?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:I think it's really funny how little poo poo Trump is getting over the "pussy" comments. Even when they talk about it they are just like 'it's trump Trump previously described Hillary Clinton as having been "schlonged" in 2008, I don't know that this even rates
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 00:55
|
|
'
|
This is why you take a page from the Girl Scouts and try to sell treats to people after they've done what they came to do Amateur hour
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 01:12
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Reminder: there's a 10% viability threshold on the GOP side. No idea what that does to the reporting if Rubio gets 10.1% and Jeb! gets 9.9% or vice versa. At least we'll all get to find out together and it probably doesn't involve games of chance probably
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
Joementum posted:I am not a fan of the MSNBC graphics department's implication that the winner will receive all the delegates. all those Clinton campaign staffers from 2008 had to get jobs doing something e: I feel slightly bad making this joke because honestly I'm sure most of them weren't nearly Mark Penn level dumb
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
axeil posted:Trump winning by 15% while Kasich and Jeb! (and possibly Cruz) clown on Rubio is loving incredible. uh what dem numbers are you looking at- Decision Desk has him up 20.5% last I looked
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 02:06
|
|
|
Cardboard Box A posted:Now I am even more confused. sorry you missed out on that classic piece of internet drama my man look up "Jennifer Diane Reitz"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 02:08
|
|
|
cheesetriangles posted:I thought socialists couldn't jump? Jews were theorized to have a racial advantage at basketball (In the 40's/50's)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 02:48
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Jun 2, 2024 03:20 |
|
|
Sucrose posted:What kind of undemocratic poo poo is that? Do the Republicans do that? no they do not and it's hugely undemocratic but superdelegate pledges are also completely non-binding personal endorsements (before the convention), and it is very unlikely that superdelegates would vote en-masse to make someone who was down in pledged delegates the nominee regardless of commitments made earlier in the race- because the consequences for doing so are so obviously catastrophic in terms of schism/loss of legitimacy/reduced voter turnout/etc.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 10, 2016 09:22
|
|