Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
It's always amusing when a vehicle starts rolling because someone hasn't set the brakes properly, they panic and try to stop it, and then after it does stop they still don't bother to properly set the brakes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
If you're interested, there's a lot of now-declassified stuff about how this was done back in WWII out there. While this might not entirely track with modern practice, even back then bombmakers were deliberately designing mechanisms to kill the bomb disposal folks trying to disarm them.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
I pump plenty of dangerous gases into the house myself so having a superior gas-fired stove isn't really a huge increase in risk

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Lovely Joe Stalin posted:

How very GBS for the OSHA thread to be hating on the victim of a lack of Health & Safety standards. And gently caress those sight impaired folks as well, right?

If you're blind enough to not see an open basement access in front of you, you're blind enough to be walking with a cane, which even in this case is entirely sufficient to allow you to identify the open pit and walk around it.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Generally speaking, you do want to have a way to make the helicopter fall out of the sky in a graceful and controlled manner, as opposed to doing it on its own once the fuel runs out.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

You're not going to be able to do that without collective control, which is the "fall out of the sky" button being talked about.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
You should try reading posts in the context of the ongoing discussion instead of treating them as some grand statement made in isolation.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
I can't tell if that guillotine has two separate controls to keep both hands occupied, or if the operator is just exercising proper discipline in keeping their free hand away from it.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Demineralised water (which is as "pure" as it can get) tastes like rear end and is also really bad for you.

If the water doesn't have those trace salts in it, it's actually ripping them out of the rest of your body, and you need those to live.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
The story is that the toilet wasn't actually working properly, and stuff leaking out was a regular thing. The root cause turned out to be that all the astronauts had asked for a large, even when they actually had more proportionate anatomy.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
It's plugged in, so probably preheating for the next stage.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Those scooby doos won't know what hit 'em!

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
They're fine for things where one or the other isn't used very frequently. Rural roads that see like three cars a day, or spur lines that see one train a year, that sort of thing.

If both the track and the road are heavily used then it's a recipe for disaster.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Burt Sexual posted:

No poo poo? So what about motorcycle helmets? Or is their design inherently different to allow no expiring

You should be replacing your motorcycle helmet every five years, or after a major impact, whichever comes first.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Guyver posted:

I just kind of find it insulting they think you need two people for 165 lbs.

Things can be bulky enough to require multiple people even if they're not especially heavy.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

Are we really not? There's no real way to say. The US was still doing that poo poo in secret up until the 1960's, that we know of.

We live in hellworld, I wouldn't put anything past governments/big business.

The reason it was happening in secret is that we as a society generally agree that it's completely and totally un-loving-acceptable. Undoubtedly there are sociopaths still doing that sort of thing in various dark corners of the world, and also in silicon valley - but when such things come to light, it's the responsibility of anyone with any sort of moral center to stand up and say that yes, this is still and has always been completely unacceptable.

Don't make excuses for murderous sociopaths.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Ok mengele.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Bags of some granular household product, yeah.

The bit that looks like a car in profile is the white top of the bag + the plastic carry handle.

e: after some searching it looks like water softener. Those of you who read other GBS threads may recognize the company's logo!

Jabor fucked around with this message at 09:06 on Nov 17, 2019

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

Guyver posted:

Second when people say "lift with your legs" they mean to remove the spinal loading,

That's interesting, because I always thought that it meant "lift with your legs", i.e. use your strong leg muscles to do the lifting (that get a relevant workout every day lifting your upper body) instead of overworking your back muscles (that, unless you specifically train them, are generally only used for stabilization).

It seems weird to invent an entirely new and non-obvious definition and then rant about how the definition you invented is a bad idea?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply