|
Logikv9 posted:Baby Hitler is running as a Republican. hosed up way to talk about Marco he's having a hard week already
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 01:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 23:37 |
|
|
Combed Thunderclap posted:Gwen's power color is definitely purple Snappy dressed mods, always a good thing
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
crazy cloud posted:why is this, or anything, in milwaukee Isn't the race there p. tight?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
JT Jag posted:On the eve of this debate, I'm feeling kinda gassy. I ate too much pulled pork, I feel like a trash man, good day for politics
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
Logikv9 posted:rigged economy, take a drink Logik to commit suicide by alcohol poisoning
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:06
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Is this the exact same suit he always wears fixed that, man's a man of the people, two suits are the opiate of the elite
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
Hillary Clinton lookin like a senator in Star Trek
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
Haha Bernie brings up 'real' unemployment now?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
"You're not in the white house yet" didn't get the claps you hoped for there huh
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
Bernie's gonna get those babies and retired people working to fix the 'real' unemployment!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
What the gently caress is a speculation tax
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
No seriously ask him what the gently caress a speculation tax is
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:23
|
|
|
All I want is someone to ask what the gently caress a speculation tax is, Bernie just invented the most meaningless buzzword I've ever heard and he's not getting called on it Also fix K-12 you stupid old gently caress
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:24
|
|
|
Shear Modulus posted:a HFT tax Oh the thing Clinton has also called for, but he called it a non-existent name because he can't say high frequency trade tax I guess
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:25
|
|
|
I assume Bernie's gonna be made to justify his campaign retweeting an outreach manager or whatever attacking a random latina activist for supporting Clinton too right
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:27
|
|
|
Majorian posted:Because that is the same level of proxy as Madeline Albright. I mean she literally works for his campaign, he pays her a salary.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:29
|
|
|
PleasureKevin posted:hillary: we need someone to lead on these issues Sanders took the same stance of civil unions are good and marriage is a state issue until 2006
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:As opposed to a Sec. of State, and President who didn't evolve to ANY view remotely friendly to LGBTQ until near the end game. Lol 'near the end game'.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
Demonachizer posted:Do marijuana lol Let's be honest there's no good way for an old Jewish man to say minority names even in support.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
boom boom boom posted:these mics are driving me crazy
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:37
|
|
|
Joementum posted:It's much better than the MSNBC Dem debate. Consider how much we've talked about policy already compared to whether Obama is a progressive or not. Yea this is more dull but also way meatier at least
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:39
|
|
|
LGD posted:
Haha what? I missed that, that rules.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:40
|
|
|
Pick posted:Her answer is basically "God, who knows?" I mean asking either of these old white people 'how are you gonna fix racial divides' is gonna get two different flavors of 'poo poo man I'll loving try my best but I can't do much'.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:41
|
|
|
Mad Whiteys: Are they mayhaps right?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
I'm super into just asking them trap questions like "What about the whites, though?"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:43
|
|
|
haha what? You gave Sanders the out of 'also is this just a bullshit question?'
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Honestly I thought Hillary's response was kind of boilerplate I really doubt any of them had better than boilerplate answers for 'yea but what of white people issues hmmm?' Sanders is giving his generic rising tide lifts all boats speech it sounds like.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Yeah nothing really new or substantially addressing the question in Bernie's response Yea I think they both made valid, if generic, points. Bernie had good stats, Hillary talked about poo poo like how Appalachia is basically dying in front of us. Good answers to a weird question.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
Ask Sanders why he talked about immigrants taking jobs from American workers then
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:49
|
|
|
Pick posted:PBS is the real winner tonight, this debate has a ton of substance. I think this is the first debate that's actually been meaningful honestly
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
Pick posted:Yeah, neither is looking great in it, but... good? The moderators are asking questions that matter, and holding the candidates to them fairly well. Yea they're both having high and low bits but I think the main takeaway from this will be 'oh that was a pretty informative debate right before a couple primaries, cool'.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:57
|
|
|
Heh, buttress
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:58
|
|
|
Oh Snapple! posted:hahahah gently caress off with that poo poo answer There is literally no legal way to answer it other than that
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
So did any of you guys expect any politician to give any answer but that? Like, you know if she talked about it like she knew about it she'd be violating election law right?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:02
|
|
|
Both did very well there
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Your commercials are poo poo PBS AND GRANDPA ISN'T DONE YET
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:09
|
|
|
really? Highlights from what we just saw? Thanks Raw.Pick posted:Glass-Steagall is woefully outdated and bringing it back would not be as substantive as claimed. Warren herself said it was mainly symbolic, I don't know why Sanders is making it his hill to die on.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:10
|
|
|
Yes hello I am Secretary of Clinton
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:11
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:How's it been going? I'm not sure if I want to bother tuning in or not this late in. It's quite good, if you want probably the first 'real' debate from either side this is 100% that. A bit dull, but both of them are having very good showings at actually digging into their issues.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 23:37 |
|
|
Brannock posted:Dull? loving hell, this is the most engrossing debate yet True, I'm comparing it to what we've had before that were much more...let's be nice and say 'theatrical'. If you like you some real debate this is purestrain gold.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:14
|
|