|
Logikv9 posted:Hillary "MY RECORDDDD" Clinton Pretty good record though
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:20
|
|
Cat Army 
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 14:40 |
|
|
Brannock posted:Qualified HOW? You've married or been appointed (or carpetbagged) your way into every position in your entire life. You barely did poo poo as a Senator, you lasted only four years as SecState. The only thing you're qualified for is increasing your personal power by increasing your backstage connections and speechmaking to elites bounties. Bernouts again outing themselves as misogynists. Carpetbagging. Nice.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:34
|
|
|
Pander posted:1) Carpet-bagging has nothing to do with gender. Yeah that was my bad actually. Sounded like a gendered slur a la carpet muncher.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:38
|
|
|
Yeah sanders attacking Wall Street (all fine and good!) is the real way to fix race relations Jesus Christ.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:42
|
|
|
SeANMcBAY posted:I want this white people question to be asked at a GOP debate.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:47
|
|
|
Joementum posted:Tying this back to trade policy is an *extremely* Bernie answer, and exactly what you'd expect him to say, but it's probably too wonky to segue into here. Also bitching about free trade is just insane. I knew the guy was lefty but I still find it hard to wrap my mind around the fact that he's a loving protectionist!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 03:48
|
|
|
That was a terrible answer from Hillary.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Nonsense posted:You've starved thousands in Mexico. gently caress your free trade, libertarian in all but name. Gamma Nerd posted:"that we don't coordinate with" It's a PAC, they legitimately don't. The only democrat who did was Martin O'Malley, which is why all the a-list democratic operatives jumped to Hillary's campaign.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
She's absolutely right on the Wall Street reform thing. Her plan is way more comprehensive than sanders'
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:08
|
|
|
Excellent answer. Seriously excellent.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:20
|
|
|
Hahahaha gently caress Sanders and gently caress that answer.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:23
|
|
|
This debate has absolutely convinced me Bernie Sanders would be a disaster on foreign policy and foreign affairs. I legitimately wonder as to his sanity.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:50
|
|
|
Tatum Girlparts posted:Actually while I've always thought they were both strong, this debate made me see Sanders is a much better debater than I gave him credit for before and can put up just as good a fight as Clinton if he goes to the general. Oh he did very very well, especially on domestic affairs. His foreign policy is nonetheless appalling and reveals deep levels of ignorance and nativity.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 04:54
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:I happily plan on voting for either democratic candidate, friend. This is me, I'm a loyal democrat. But I'd really have to give some real thought to my vote if Sanders won. I'm not sure I can vote for a man who would empower Iran while simultaneously failing to adequately regulate Wall Street.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 05:06
|
|
|
Schnorkles posted:honestly as a poli sci nerd kissinger being in the dialogue is cool as gently caress because he's basically the poster child for overreach of the realist mold of ir.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 06:21
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 14:40 |
|
|
Lyapunov Unstable posted:I think it's bizarre how somebody can be "obviously stronger" on foreign policy, repeated universally among news outlets, with the specific points of the "strongness" never ever specified anywhere by anybody. http://www.vox.com/2016/2/9/10939640/bernie-sanders-foreign-policy http://www.vox.com/2016/2/11/10966582/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-foreign-policy
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2016 20:29
|
|