|
I was positive that guy was going to get run over.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2016 22:16 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 17:41 |
|
Caro was Abu Hajaar.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2016 23:42 |
|
It's tagging an AH-64. Was it here that we had the discussion over the value of rotary CAS? Edit: Super Cobra as determined below Godholio fucked around with this message at 17:24 on May 15, 2016 |
# ¿ May 15, 2016 06:03 |
|
Chinatown posted:So, youre saying that that's not Abu firing that missile? As soon as I realized that dude was counting down I was pretty confident they knew what they were doing.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 08:05 |
|
The first thing I saw about it said it was an Apache, but the youtube video says Super Cobra. Didn't know Turkey had those.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2016 08:44 |
|
Smiling Jack posted:The French used to deploy an actual brothel for the troops "There was a vast BMC in Saigon known as 'the park of the buffaloes'"
|
# ¿ May 22, 2016 18:49 |
|
So Boeing is pitching yet another F-15 upgrade to the USAF, this time called the 2040C. This would be an upgrade to the existing fleet rather than a new-build like the Silent Eagle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xGY2JBuSCU0
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 00:21 |
|
Pretty much, but the USAF will not buy new F-15s. Edit: They cost about as much as we'd have paid for F-22s had the 381 order been upheld.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 00:31 |
|
aphid_licker posted:Is that really more economical than some hypothetical factory-new improved F-15 version? Probably. If they were to crank out new F-15s with these features it would probably cost $135M apiece. But the big problem with buying new F-15s is that it completely fucks over any modernization effort. You can kiss the sixth-gen program goodbye for at least 15 more years because Congress simply will not do both. Three loving fighter jet programs for the USAF? That's hilarious.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 23:12 |
|
So did costs. That helped drive mergers from a couple dozen down to three loving companies, which only made it worse.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 23:32 |
|
Booblord Zagats posted:ISIS full of buddy fuckers Kind of by definition.
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 05:01 |
|
Zeris posted:rename thread DaMothaFuckinShareZone
|
# ¿ May 29, 2016 23:51 |
|
https://twitter.com/nihilist_arbys/status/737325206583316484
|
# ¿ May 30, 2016 21:00 |
|
I'm the concrete wall backstop.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2016 01:34 |
|
Zeris posted:If that is a videogame shot then well I am stupid Aside from the fact that it would take an Exorcist maneuver to turn around like that, yes it's clearly a loving video game.
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2016 19:58 |
|
It still blows my mind that people bought that BF2 F-35 backflip video.
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2016 20:12 |
|
Grem posted:The only reason I clicked the video was because I was wondering "how big was the family". If it were a drone video, the family would probably be doubling in size.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 06:43 |
|
I don't care, this is an awesome post from the AI dashcam thread:Handen posted:I got some pretty cool footage the other night.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 17:46 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:The interphone on your plane didn't come with subtitles? Until the ongoing block upgrade it did, with this as the only actual audio.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2016 02:09 |
|
That's the most sci-fi looking weapon I've ever seen used.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 23:23 |
|
Duke Chin posted:I choose to believe this was a dude laying on his belly get his ears/bowels absolutely wrecked shooting this footage This was seriously my automatic assumption. I didn't even consider that it could've been anything else.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2016 15:51 |
|
Yeesh. At first I thought he had a packed chute in that backpack....NOPE. Crazy framed blanket parachute!
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2016 15:50 |
|
Probably the other guy, but yeah.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2016 00:25 |
|
Zeris posted:Did they ever actually get in trouble for that? There was an inquiry, but it determined that while the picture was inappropriate (particularly due to context in the media) it wasn't really intended as a political statement.
|
# ¿ Jun 25, 2016 18:16 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2016 20:25 |
|
Hand sanitizer. Which is only marginally less ridiculous.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2016 22:20 |
|
Hot Karl Marx posted:that's why they go full throttle when they hit the cable right? incase that happens? Yep.
|
# ¿ Jul 9, 2016 18:04 |
|
Here's a cool not-mil plane video:
|
# ¿ Jul 12, 2016 15:17 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2016 21:32 |
|
NAS Fallon. The same message is also displayed on the O Club's sign in between lunch/dinner menus, and there's another traffic sign just inside the gate that takes 3 screens' worth to say that it's banned on the entire base.
|
# ¿ Jul 14, 2016 21:54 |
|
That's a thing I never knew I wanted.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2016 18:04 |
|
EVA BRAUN BLOWJOBS posted:Well poo poo this is a weird A4 with no forward assist Edit: Actually I'm not sure it's an RRA upper. But he was specifically looking for a flat top with no forward assist. Godholio fucked around with this message at 20:18 on Jul 15, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 15, 2016 20:15 |
|
That ship is completely hosed. It just takes a while to actually fill up with enough water to sink. Ships going down in <5m are exceedingly rare. The spine of that ship was snapped like a twig by that torpedo near the bow, which is exactly what the torpedo is supposed to do. The entire front end is basically being held on by the few surviving internal walls in that section.
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 00:39 |
|
Yeah I did that a loving ton of times with the GI Joe Warthog.
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 05:06 |
|
You see, JDAMs have made strafing obsolete. Guns are no longer necessary for effective CAS.
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2016 09:37 |
|
Pesticide20 posted:Doesn't it still need a software or firmware update or some poo poo for the internal gun to work? I thought th[/url]ere was a big bugaboo about that for a while. Yeah but that's actually normal. The whole thing was a non-issue from an aircraft development standpoint, the only real -worthy part was the USMC declaring it operational as insanely early as they did (for political reasons).
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2016 19:43 |
|
You're probably right, but if they wanted they could hold off without major repercussions at this point.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 03:49 |
|
iyaayas01 posted:"without major repercussions" in the real world...yes. But busting threshold values means an APB breach, and that means bigwig PEOs have to go explain why they screwed up. So I am confident that they will be formally declaring IOC before the end of the year, even if the aircraft itself wouldn't be deployed in combat until well after 3F is fielded a couple years down the road. Missing milestones, budgets, and timetables have happened so often in this program the PEOs probably have reserved seats in the front row. But you're definitely right that it will be a non-factor for deployments either way...even if actually met IOC standards when they declare IOC, it wouldn't deploy yet. Edit:
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 18:03 |
|
Ah, I didn't realize there was a new roadmap. That makes sense.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 20:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 17:41 |
|
Capn Beeb posted:It sounds weird and pissed off, whatever it is That's loving terrifying, is what it is. At the end its moving closer.
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 07:57 |