|
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 18:35 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 23:20 |
|
just because html accepts it does not absolve you of your responsibility as a professional html writer. always close your break tag --
|
# ? Feb 23, 2016 18:59 |
|
<![CDATA[
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 00:39 |
|
craisins posted:was ie really that prominent in 2009? i didn't know anyone still using it back then China is very proud of their IE6 lifestyle.
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:36 |
|
i started writing html when i was a kid in like 1995 and some document at the time said to use <p> tags at the end of a paragraph like a double <br> with no </p> anywhere i occasionally help my dad with a site he has and he still does it that way and it's <p> annoying but browsers accept it so w/e
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:51 |
|
jony ive aces posted:i started writing html when i was a kid in like 1995 and some document at the time said to use <p> tags at the end of a paragraph like a double <br> with no </p> anywhere judging from a lot of code ive seen, youve worked everywhere I've worked
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 01:56 |
|
jony ive aces posted:i started writing html when i was a kid in like 1995 and some document at the time said to use <p> tags at the end of a paragraph like a double <br> with no </p> anywhere wtf
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 02:00 |
|
someone posted a link a long time ago to a website FAQ page, where each line of text was inside a p tag with the style font-size: larger. but they never put a /p anywhere, so each line was a <p style="font-size: larger;"> child of all the preceding <p style="font-size: larger;"> tags, so by around the 30th line or so the text size was like 500px. that was cool
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 03:37 |
|
yeah let me write html like a fuckin idiot
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 03:41 |
|
r u not sposed to do the <p> wtf haha
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 03:58 |
|
Roosevelt posted:someone posted a link a long time ago to a website FAQ page, where each line of text was inside a p tag with the style font-size: larger. but they never put a /p anywhere, so each line was a <p style="font-size: larger;"> child of all the preceding <p style="font-size: larger;"> tags, so by around the 30th line or so the text size was like 500px. that was cool Yeah it was a sewing machine site
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 04:36 |
|
dont xslt shame
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 07:09 |
|
once I saw code that had attributes in the closing tag like <font size="4">blah</font size="4"> which never worked in any browser at all so why would they do it? maybe it was a paste error or something idk
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 07:45 |
|
Smythe posted:r u not sposed to do the <p> wtf haha tbf in the mid 90s you could get away with it since your pages were p much HTML code:
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 12:56 |
|
I still do my website in bespoke html
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 14:29 |
|
jony ive aces posted:you are supposed to do </p> tags but some thing i read in the mid 90s said not to and my dad still doesn't to this day why is your dad writing html in 2016, jesus man he deserves better
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 15:27 |
|
time to show him LaTeX
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 15:28 |
|
N.Z.'s Champion posted:once I saw code that had attributes in the closing tag like <font size="4">blah</font size="4"> it's very explicitly stated beta xhtml6 requirement poo poo
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 18:14 |
|
Symbolic Butt posted:time to show him LaTeX
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 18:16 |
|
Roosevelt posted:im the IE line that's dropping like any microsoft product that's not windows
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 18:18 |
|
u mean office
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 18:59 |
|
i close my break tags when i write html but i usually just use haml which may or may not do it for me idgaf
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 21:08 |
|
LP0 ON FIRE posted:it's very explicitly stated beta xhtml6 requirement poo poo lol are you serious?
|
# ? Feb 24, 2016 21:30 |
|
jony ive aces posted:you are supposed to do </p> tags but some thing i read in the mid 90s said not to and my dad still doesn't to this day i do it like the bottom way hehe. i didnt know it was bad, or not good. i also didnt klnow p were tags i thot they just made like a big space. ^^
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 02:46 |
|
lol
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 03:20 |
|
Man who moderates YOSPOS: how do i use the <p> ?
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 03:21 |
|
i was curious about the actual canonical list of void elements quote:Void elements
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 03:23 |
|
My Linux Rig posted:lol are you serious? no they arent there's no attributes in closing tags
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 03:25 |
|
pram posted:i was curious about the actual canonical list of void elements i had to look up wbr cause wtf is that quote:The <wbr> (Word Break Opportunity) tag specifies where in a text it would be ok to add a line-break. introduced in HTML5. that's some attention to detail. w3schools posted:<p>Try to shrink the browser window, to view how the very long word in the paragraph below will break:</p> ah yes finally the future is here. we've been waiting so long
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 05:27 |
|
quote this if u used phoenix/firebird or whichever it was called that came first, i forget
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 05:42 |
|
jony ive aces posted:i started writing html when i was a kid in like 1995 and some document at the time said to use <p> tags at the end of a paragraph like a double <br> with no </p> anywhere there's a bunch of weird rules for omitting closing tags in specific situations quote:A p element's end tag may be omitted if the p element is immediately followed by an address, article, aside, blockquote, div, dl, fieldset, footer, form, h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6, header, hgroup, hr, main, nav, ol, p, pre, section, table, or ul, element, or if there is no more content in the parent element and the parent element is not an a element. i was trying to generate html from xml once and it came out all wrong because it hosed up the tags by either merging stuff like empty paragraphs into <p /> or splitting self-closing tags into <br></br>
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 06:14 |
|
i dont close break tags because i don't use them gently caress break tags
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 14:15 |
|
it hurts when i <p>
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 17:01 |
|
back then i also didn't to close my list items with a </li> and now i do and it's like sure whatever, i'll do it the proper way then but if you think about it what the gently caress is going to follow after a </li> except another <li> or the closing </ul> or </ol>. so </li> tags are pretty redundant. i guess that's why there's stuff like suffix posted:there's a bunch of weird rules for omitting closing tags in specific situations
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 17:08 |
|
browsers should have refused to display bad html from the beginning, then we wouldn't have this mess where you have to replicate bugs from 15 year old versions of IE
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 17:32 |
|
Sweevo posted:browsers should have refused to display bad html from the beginning, then we wouldn't have this mess where you have to replicate bugs from 15 year old versions of IE if they're not on ie10 or newer, gently caress em
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 17:36 |
|
Sweevo posted:browsers should have refused to display bad html from the beginning
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 17:38 |
|
Sweevo posted:browsers should have refused to display bad html from the beginning, then we wouldn't have this mess where you have to replicate bugs from 15 year old versions of IE but they didn't because Microsoft bad
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 18:54 |
|
if html is bad it is solely the fault of Microsoft holding it back for a literal decade with the flaming hunk of poo poo know as internet explorer and now edge
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 18:54 |
|
|
# ? May 15, 2024 23:20 |
|
nope. IE was dragging browsers into the future and its nutscrapes fault everything is so bad.
|
# ? Feb 25, 2016 18:56 |