|
MysticalMachineGun posted:(Not playing favourites here, honestly can't find a Pope with DiNatale in it) 
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2016 00:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
Is the plan for Labor to run a scare campaign against the Greens by labelling them as in lock-step with the Liberals? Because I don't see how that would work.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 03:55
|
|
|
Bent Wookiee posted:It's been said that this is going to be the Greens "GST moment", which doesn't really stand up under scrutiny. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 04:03
|
|
|
Lid posted:Unless you are specifically pinpointing one guy you really have it in for Voting 1, 2, 3, 487, 4, 5 is totally worth the extra twenty minutes in the booth.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
I also sometimes number the boxes 115, 116, 118, 117, 119, just in the vain hope that for a brief second the scrutineer may wonder why I did that.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
Seagull posted:doing it for the sake of annoying scrutineers is bad Are you allowed to doodle cartoons in the margins instead, or would that invalidate the vote?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Calling a DD before the budget is really crazy.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 06:49
|
|
|
The Safe Schools decision is where I'm frankly wondering what the point was of replacing Abbott.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 07:45
|
|
|
Each party should just run the other sides ads but in monochrome and shifted to a minor key.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2016 04:12
|
|
|
freebooter posted:Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the lesson of the 2013 election that personal popularity/unpopularity doesn't matter? i.e. the public widely disliked Abbott but voted Liberal in a landslide anyway because 2PP is what matters to most people. Which would suggest Mal's personal approval rating is irrelevant. However looking at the opinion polls at the time of the election while Abbott was more "unsatisfied" than "satisfied", Rudd was polling worse. The election was called during the honeymoon period after Rudd 2 was installed and then his ratings plummeted during the campaign. edit: Here's a wikipedia link for some opinion poll data: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_Australian_federal_election,_2013
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2016 00:13
|
|
|
Does "deter investment that creates jobs" refer to anything specifically or is it just political white noise?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Wow. People are starting to flock to Shorten. I guess Turdball only has soft support. Very interesting
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2016 02:12
|
|
|
The Libs in opposition could reinstate Abbott as their leader. And then after a term of Bland Shorten he might have a shot at getting back in as PM. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2016 02:40
|
|
|
How do they think punting the referendum into the distant mists of next government mean it suddenly isn't an election issue? edit: Do they know that the opposition they'll be running against isn't the other Liberal faction?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
Would that mean the rest of Queensland becomes South Queensland? And when they split again the next new state would be New South Queensland?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2016 02:55
|
|