|
I'm surprised The Danish Girl only got one gong. The Academy normally loves their tragedy porn.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 11:49 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 11:30 |
|
Kegluneq posted:You'd have been complaining even more if Eddie Redmayne had won Best Actor though. Well, yeah. Tangerine was superior in every way and got totally snubbed. Relevant video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjDufjtIr1M
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 11:56 |
|
StoneOfShame posted:Tangerine was good but it wasn't that good, it was better than The Danish Girl but that was a massive piece of poo poo. The best film of last year was either The Look of Silence or Inside Out, the former didn't even win documentary which is absurd. And ordinarily, Tangerine would be Oscar bait in itself. I mean, a semi-biographical film about trans sex workers of colour? Academy would fall over themselves to give it nominations.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 17:11 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Is the pink elephant about star wars that it is really bad? Sadly, very few people criticised TFA without resorting to the phrase "little white cuckball".
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 20:43 |
|
I've found probably the most ridiculous statement to ever be put into the public records of Parliament.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 15:12 |
|
Guavanaut posted:What's the context of this? The Home Affairs Select Committee is conducting an inquiry into prostitution with the aim of criminalising the purchase of sex. This is from one of the written evidence submissions.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 15:15 |
|
Unison's submission is rather ridiculous too. It says that "prostitution is a form of commercial sexual exploitation, not work". I mean, imagine being a trade union that actively wants to gently caress over workers' rights instead of trying to expand them.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 15:37 |
|
Health is a physiological need, not a form of work, therefore we will withdraw from representing NHS junior doctors. *Unison disappears in a puff of logic, Jeremy Hunt lets out an evil hahkle*
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 15:45 |
|
At least they're not going fully pathetic and nominating something on the farm for Tree of the Year.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 22:12 |
|
There is the Tilbury ferry, though.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2016 22:31 |
|
I imagine fear of concussions is why the WWE don't want to see the Curb Stomp or the Styles Clash being used. Christ, those moves are hard on the head even if done properly.Pesmerga posted:That's an expression I'd never heard, and decided to look it up. Holy poo poo that's nasty. Ric Flair bladed so much that he bleeds these days just from frowning.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2016 12:47 |
|
Manic_Misanthrope posted:The Curb Stomp is pretty safe actually, at least the Rollins version. Unless you're crazy, you take it like a front break fall where the impact is spread out across your arms instead, but it's easilly imitable and kids on the playground don't know how to take it safely. So it got canned. Speaking of which, didn't every school have an urban legend that some kid at the next school over had to go to hospital after being given the Walls of Jericho?
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2016 12:59 |
|
According to friends in GPNI and APNI, the DUP have found a surefire vote-winner: reintroducing the death penalty.
|
# ¿ Mar 3, 2016 19:30 |
|
Remember the 5p plastic bag charge, one of the few positive legacies of the coalition government? Nick Clegg announced it on a dogging site.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 13:41 |
|
Guavanaut posted:What's wrong with that? Nothing. It's just hilarious.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 13:50 |
|
Guavanaut posted:
Via the Graun Jeremy Corbyn: 'I favour decriminalising the sex industry' posted:Views on sex trade believed to be Labour leader’s personal opinions rather than party policy. Also, reminder that one of the UK's largest trade unions literally said this:
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 15:04 |
|
Guavanaut posted:I agree. Sex work is a form of commercial sexual exploitation as long as [x] work is a form of commercial [x] exploitation. You're more likely to get Socialism 101 out of Pissflaps than you are Dave Prentis, mind you.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 15:13 |
|
Jose posted:Are there any estimates how much money the government would make through taxes if prostitution was legal? Well, sex workers already pay tax on their earnings, so…
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 15:16 |
|
Gort posted:Do they? As much as all the people paid cash-in-hand for other work (EG: Any self-employed carpenter, plumber, mechanic etc), you mean? Pretty much.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 16:00 |
|
dispatch_async posted:
At least she isn't threatening to shoot Corbyn for standing up for sex worker rights.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 18:44 |
|
Well, her friend doesn't have any shotguns, because she was asking on Twitter where said friend could find them.
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 18:45 |
|
As much as I hate the whole "Harridan Harpyperson worked for pedophiles" meme the right-wing love to bring out, I'm still loving the replies to this tweet: https://twitter.com/HarrietHarman/status/705763905709150209
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2016 23:57 |
|
winegums posted:This is exactly what I thought Corbyn meant to do. Not to make prostitution legal, but to make solicitation of prostitutes illegal. Prostitution is already legal and solicitation is already illegal. Corbyn (and McDonnell) are veteran advocates for full decriminalisation of consensual sex work.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2016 00:14 |
|
There's also this analysis of the law's effect in Sweden, which brings up a salient point that a study funded by the Swedish government with the purpose of reaching a favourable analysis of the law barely managed in its job.Ann Jordan posted:It is important to note at the outset that the mandate for the Skarhed Report ensured that the results would not provide any support for abandoning the prostitution law: “One starting point of our work has been that the purchase of sexual services is to remain criminalized” (Skarhed 2010, 4). Consequently, the final report could not contain any evidence on failures; it could only report successes even when evidence is lacking.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2016 17:25 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2016 17:30 |
|
Happy International "When's International Men's Day?" Day, comrades.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2016 01:05 |
|
winegums posted:Willie Rennie MSP His soapbox will probably be "be nice to Tim uguu~". Seriously, that was his speech a Autumn Conference in favour of setting up another policy working group on Trident. I imagine he's going to give a similar speech on all-women shortlists at Conference this weekend.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 19:36 |
|
big scary monsters posted:Pissflaps for Lib Dem leader. I wouldn't vote for him. He's not popular.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 22:12 |
|
Glokta posted:Who would you vote for? Somebody who could win a leadership election.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 22:31 |
|
Pissflaps isn't popular and we need someone who is popular.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 22:40 |
|
https://twitter.com/missmillicent/status/708628959647371264
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 17:07 |
|
thespaceinvader posted:I wonder if they're similarly worried about tobacco and alcohol... I think the new policy is still more restrictive on cannabis than alcohol and tobacco: while it would be legal to buy or sell, import into the country would be restricted and you wouldn't be able to get pre-rolled joints at a shop. Only one "420 blaze it" pun in the debate, though.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 20:10 |
|
Guavanaut posted:What would the policy say about growing it? Legal, with restrictions that you don't grow too much. The policy also says people should be able to form small social clubs to pool their pot farm together.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 20:39 |
|
What the gently caress is up with the state of that loving Rod Liddle article in the Times.
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2016 18:22 |
|
Labour to abstain on the snooper's charter vote tomorrow.
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2016 09:10 |
|
Oberleutnant posted:Realtalk though the last week has been a disappointing one in terms of Labour's willingness to actively challenge tory policy and narratives. I shouldn't be surprised, but here we are. Three or four years, surely? I'm actually really disappointed. I thought the last time Burnham went all securocrat over this bill, Corbyn would have boxed his ears. Sadly not.
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2016 09:39 |
|
hit button posted:What's particularly wrong with the Investigatory Powers Bill in concept? That's a genuine question, I'm not very familiar with it. The "judicial oversight" isn't really a warrant. It's basically the Home Secretary asking a friendly unqualified magistrate to give her the right to spy on anyone she sees fit, with legal powers even the US don't give to its intelligence agencies.
|
# ¿ Mar 14, 2016 11:29 |
|
SNP are apparently going to abstain on the snoopers charter too.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 18:36 |
|
Always relevant explanation of metadata from the EFF:
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 19:20 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 11:30 |
|
Snooper's charter passes 281-15. Fucks sake.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 20:45 |