|
That's a very through guide! Thanks for putting it together
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 12:01 |
|
|
Ok I might throw something in for this. I'll see how time goes.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 24, 2016 18:21
|
|
|
Riso posted:I think you misunderstood. He is using the Wedge 2.0 model, not that it has a 2l engine. He won't say what engine. I knew most of that except the front tyres being smaller thing. Why is that? weight distribution?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 16:20
|
|
|
Any quick pointers on g/kwh? I got away in Chips' challenge with quite a thirsty car so I have no idea what is reasonable ballpark in this championship
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
Riso posted:The effort post on calculating fuel consumption http://discourse.automationgame.com/t/brc-1966-gentleman-brobots-club-race-7-p-q/6413/102 cheers for this
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2016 18:20
|
|
|
e: wrong thread
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2017 14:09
|
|
|
Rally stages stuff more angled to off road could be interesting
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2017 07:23
|
|
|
See, I'm kind of the other way round. I like the apprehension of being locked into a design, and just seeing how the plan plays out. I don't have time to adjust pit strategy and suspension and gears week on week - hell I just clicked "Race" setup because I ran out of time to entry. I know I may be somewhat unique in this since I work weekends too, but a lack of ongoing changes is very appealing to me. Added into it as well is that tracks are different so to change for one week may mean you need to change back the other way the next; it feels like the goal is unfocused somewhat. A season of short stages would also eliminate pit strategy. I suppose what would be perfect for me (and again, I understand, may not work for you running it or others competing) would be a month of races, a month to revise, a month of the same tracks, a month to revise - for however many cycles. Whether those tracks are all selected to emphasise a design feature (offroad, speed, etc) or geared towards people making an all rounder is something that could be decided on too. I think it could be cool to compare first entries and last entries as well. Like we might find the worst car from the final race rounds would still beat the best car from the year beginning, that kind of thing. Revision points could feature to whatever degree, but I think a sense of continuity (body style, engine family for example) would be good. It feels like I'm falling behind in the current challenge because others have more real-life time, not because my design is bad. And that's okay, it's the nature of this '89 game, but I personally wouldn't mind it being different next time round. I think I should make it clear here that I'm still very glad you're running a challenge. As I said, it's the only time I play Automation. What I'm suggesting may well be (and seems to be) the opposite of what you want to run. So yeah I know you put a lot of work into running these, and don't run a ruleset you don't like. But you asked for suggestions, and that's mine!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2017 09:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 12:01 |
|
|
I'll be entering something but I have no real time to do a decent suspension tune and will not be doing any revisions or race strategy. If anyone is more interested in those parts of the challenge, post here or drop me a PM and I'm sure we can work something out E: wrong thread simplefish fucked around with this message at 06:07 on Sep 20, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2017 05:35
|
|