|
Pochoclo posted:Okay, I guess I put it wrong. On a strict I/O basis we would be able to communicate, give and receive data, yeah, but what I meant is that the electronic sentience might have a set of intrinsic values, a personality, a worldview, or whatever, that would be so alien to human comprehension that it might not be able to make us understand it, and it might not internalize ours in turn. The AI will start with values matching those of its programmers or the values of the people who hired its programmers.
|
# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 11:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 18:21 |
|
RuanGacho posted:
If I get a regular job (not some ~creative~ position where I ~chase my dreams~) I want it to stay the same forever and work until retirement.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 12:48 |
|
McDowell posted:The only people who have that kind of economic security today are executives - and even then they usually go through a couple companies. The economic / poltical debate in a digital world shouldn't recapitulate the 20th century fight for employee privileges - instead it must lay out a standardized and simple system for contracting labor. I know next to nobody actually gets that kind of job security, but I think getting that kind of job security should be seen as a worthwhile goal by today's work drones rather than pretending ~dynamic~ ~energetic~ ~flexible~ short term jobs are the platonic ideal of work. Or just implement mincome
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2016 19:14 |