Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Even in the private sector there are a ton of "trade secrets" that anyone could legally copy, but are protected by virtue of people not finding out about them.

Trade secrets predate patent law by a long time - in fact, one of the main purposes of patent law is to incentivise making things like manufacturing techniques available for the public good, instead of being kept as trade secrets and then lost when the person who came up with them dies.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
Interestingly, while the intention of the exclusions is somewhat obvious, a (presumably unintentional) inversion of one of the clauses means that "buttocks", in Florida, actually just means the rear end in a top hat itself.

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

resurgam40 posted:

I dunno, it's hard for me to parse too, maybe the translation is bad.

It definitely sounds like a literal translation of an idiom, rather than a natural translation of the concept being presented.

Trying to do an accurate natural translation of legal text seems like an absolutely hellish task though, so...

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

IAmTheRad posted:

You need to take a look back at the second case.

Grossberg had a picture of Misty Fey on his desk that had DL-6 written on it.

The police requested Misty Fey's spirit medium powers to help in their investigation of DL-6. Grossberg helped with this. The police didn't want the public to know that the police used a Spirit Medium. Grossberg told White. White told the media. White decided to hold the dagger over Grossberg. Remember, the statute of limitations isn't over for the case, and it's still considered unsolved. Thus, Misty Fey was declared a fraud.

Remember, Yanni Yogi was declared insane. He couldn't be held responsible for murder. If the case was solved, there would be no issue with the statute of limitations.

Right, but Yanni Yogi still shot the victim, which is exactly what Misty Fey said. "Too crazy to call it murder" doesn't mean that the spirit medium was somehow wrong.

Or are spirits in japanifornia expected to be able to judge the exact mental state of the person who killed them?

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem
So why does she have burgers on her hat anyway?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jabor
Jul 16, 2010

#1 Loser at SpaceChem

CVE posted:

Personally I'm not a fan of a jury system in any form. Professional judges should decide because they are more likely to distant themselves from the personal side of things and in theory should be able to render a fair judgement. But no system is or will ever be perfect. The adversial system in general scares me.

The adversarial system is in quite a minority when you look at how justice was carried out in history.

Most commonly, justice involved a handful of professionals who, rather than squaring off with one side seeking to prosecute and the other side defending, they were all charged with attempting to figure out the truth. This is commonly known as an inquisitorial system, and (as the connotations associated with that name might imply), it wasn't exactly sunshine and rainbows in practice.

  • Locked thread