|
Neeksy posted:I have to admit I love hearing a Dem candidate take a huge rhetorical poo poo on Reagan and the Monroe Doctrine, that was one of my favorite moments. Yeah that was bullshit. I can't wait for the stats of who was asked more questions and total time speaking.
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 05:27 |
|
|
Neurolimal posted:Bernie's team will be composed of the ghosts and goats of Che, Lenin, Marx, Trotsky, the geekiest Castro son, and that gay Kim Jong Il son (he'll have him murdered first) Which castro son the geeky one. Also, which one's the bad boy, the boy next door, the dreamboat and which one is "the glue"
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
Typo posted:maybe but it makes 0 sense to tap him as VP cuz Sanders already has the left vote locked down he needs a moderate and definitely either a minority or women or both to expand his base Oprah would lock it up for him He needs Oprah
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
If Bernie gets UHC through then you will NEVER have to suffer through another boring healthcare ad.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:It's worth noting that I think that Obama is a terrible benchmark for me. I'm sure he might have been more leftist if he hadn't been obliterated every step of the way, but I get the feeling that he's perfectly comfortable focusing on neoliberal tentpoles. Well agree to disagree then Joementum posted:No, he's said he doesn't think we need a wall. for a man that loves infrastructure spending you think he wouldn't hate walls and streets so much 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
I recognize that its probably the most impossible pipe dream ever, but I might die from excitement and joy if we were to have a future where our leaders consist of Trudeau, Sanders, and Corbyn
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Homeless Friend posted:
Animal_Nuz_Clinton_&_Sanders_both_awesome.jpg
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:00
|
|
people love to put up their candidate on a pedestal
|
Hillary: "I'm not a natural politician, like my husband or President Obama" thinks: poo poo, they're not buying it Bad Titty Puker has issued a correction as of 06:09 on Mar 10, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Rexicon1 posted:Which castro son the geeky one. Also, which one's the bad boy, the boy next door, the dreamboat and which one is "the glue" The one who wore a dragon costume to a drag show
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Neurolimal posted:I recognize that its probably the most impossible pipe dream ever, but I might die from excitement and joy if we were to have a future where our leaders consist of Trudeau, Sanders, and Corbyn the 27th internationale
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Commie NedFlanders posted:her "current platform" is just rhetoric that she's figured is useful in the year of Bernie It never would. She was elected in a state that wasn't nearly as progressive as Vermont and didn't grow up in extremely progressive places. I kinda don't really care about a candidates policy past unless it's really bad and Clintons is just mixed. What I care about is them admitting they need to do things in order to get votes, which is what she's done. Like the meme that politicians don't do what they say they will in office isn't very true because reelection is a thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Heavy neutrino posted:
ummm did you see those economists' affiliations? some of them are even at non-flagship public colleges!!
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Has anyone calculated how much money Jeff Bezos stands to actually lose from a Sanders presidency I imagine it's a lot
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Neurolimal posted:I recognize that its probably the most impossible pipe dream ever, but I might die from excitement and joy if we were to have a future where our leaders consist of Trudeau, Sanders, and Corbyn i know a lot of the international media reported the LPC win in canada as the oncoming of massive left-wing governance but the idea that canada's liberals have moved one inch away from their 1990's Clintonite position has yet to be proven, and my hunch is that it won't be
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:05
|
|
|
Heavy neutrino posted:yeah and on the flipside if you look at super-detailed exit polls you find that a sizeable chunk of hillary's support comes from people who like both candidates and their policies but choose to default to hillary. on the other hand, a lot of bernie's support comes from people who, policy aside, don't like hillary on various character traits (sincere, trustworthy, cares about people like me) which is why it's so baffling that hillary is making dishonest attacks like the auto bailout claim instead of guarding her integrity indices like a hawk. I would love a cabinet with a bunch more leftist academic minds than weird businessmen and lawyers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
Neurolimal posted:I recognize that its probably the most impossible pipe dream ever, but I might die from excitement and joy if we were to have a future where our leaders consist of Trudeau, Sanders, and Corbyn against all odds, the revolution first sweeps through the anglosphere
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
Speaking times during debate laid out via reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/49rvi4/march_9th_2016_dnc_primaries_wapounivision/d0ubsi2 SPEAKING AND INTERRUPTION TOTALS (from 6:50 pm Pacific to end) Hillary total: 1409 sec or 23:29 | interrupted 10 times (not including clarification/follow-up) Bernie total: 1071 sec or 17:51 | interrupted 25 times (not including follow-ups) Started timing at 6:50 pm Pacific H - 1:40 uninterrupted H - 1:42 uninterrupted B - interrupted at 0:34, interrupted 0:40 (interrupted 5 times) | 1:30 total H - interrupted at 0:30 | 1:11 total B - interrupted at 0:15, and 0:30 seconds | 0:32 total H - interrupted at 0:20 | 0:30 total B - applause at 0:15, interrupted by mod at 25 seconds | 0:31 total H - (not her turn) Interrupted at 2 seconds, 5 seconds | 0:40 total B - (response to her response), interrupted at 10 seconds | 0:10 total H - interrupted at 1:40 for reiteration of question and applause | 3:08 total -- ignoring applause and mod questioning time B - (30 sec response), interrupted at 30 seconds and 35 seconds| 0:42 total COMMERCIAL B - Career politician question | 1:24 total H - Latino jobs, (but talked about Climate change?), interrupted at 1:33, 2:17 | 2:17 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:30 | 1:23 total B - ‘Free’ college (including his clarification up top), interrupted at 0:42 | 1:29 total H - Ph.D student/loans | 1:20 total B - Response (I said it before her) - whispers on mic on this question, interrupted at 0:42, 0:58 | 0:58 total H - Response (quote bailout quote got money), interrupted at 0:49 | 1:02 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:32 (by mods and Hillary) | 0:32 total H - Response | 0:49 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:42 | 0:45 total B - Climate change, interrupted at 0:52 | 1:29 total H - Climate change (bi-partisan specific), interrupted at 1:12 (by mods, Bernie told to speak) mod at 1:42 again | 2:00 total B - Response, interrupted at 0:42 | 0:42 total (not equal to Hill’s overtime like told) H - E. Warren question (also economy?), interrupted at 1:33 | 1:33 total B - name mentioned response, interrupted at 0:34, 0:41, 0:47 | 0:57 total COMMERCIAL H - Castro question | 1:39 total B - Cuba follow-up, interrupted at 0:35 | 0:35 total B - Castro video, interrupted at 1:19 (for follow-up question), 1:28, 2:08 | 2:08 total H - Puerto Rico debt (also an addition to BS’s video), | 1:33 total B - Response (overthrowing foreign gvmt/PR), int at 0:40 | 0:50 total H - (Supreme Court) | 1:19 total COMMERCIAL H - (Closing statement) | 1:06 total B - (Closing statement) | 1:14 total Showed Hil, Showed Bern, Showed Hil, Outro by the mods - GET OUT AND VOTE
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
Yeah Democrats tend to like both candidates, it's just primary mode so everyone's tuned up to 11. One of the underdiscussed things I always see is that, if you look at favorability ratings, even black Democrats tend to like Bernie in pretty big numbers (they, uh, just don't vote for him because [endless arguments]). I'm pretty sure when one, almost certainly Bernie, eventually drops out everyone will get in line...but I'm a little worried about the enthusiasm level of young people. Trump would probably fix that. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Heavy neutrino posted:i know a lot of the international media reported the LPC win in canada as the oncoming of massive left-wing governance but the idea that canada's liberals have moved one inch away from their 1990's Clintonite position has yet to be proven, and my hunch is that it won't be Which is about as far left as Sanders could possibly go since even UHC is a pipe dream
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:09
|
|
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:You're right, except that when a question is too good, it doesn't get answered, and from what I remember that happened there. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:09
|
|
|
Heavy neutrino posted:i know a lot of the international media reported the LPC win in canada as the oncoming of massive left-wing governance but the idea that canada's liberals have moved one inch away from their 1990's Clintonite position has yet to be proven, and my hunch is that it won't be In all fairness, even that is a leftwards leap from where Harper put him. Fuckhead wouldn't even fly over to canaindians and shoot the poo poo with their leaders for a day to end controversial protests
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:10
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:It never would. She was elected in a state that wasn't nearly as progressive as Vermont and didn't grow up in extremely progressive places. I kinda don't really care about a candidates policy past unless it's really bad and Clintons is just mixed. What I care about is them admitting they need to do things in order to get votes, which is what she's done. New York is pretty progressive
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
In a debate essentially about nothing but immigration, they weren't asked once about the harmful effects of illegal immigration, an open border, and what they would do to stop it. It was nothing more then "how do we acquire millions of free votes as soon as possible?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:30
|
|
|
lol univision is basically beting on hilary beating sanders and then forcing hilary to take a position on immigration that they can call her on it later without realizing it's poo poo like this that might actually lose the election to trump
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
Venom Snake posted:It never would. She was elected in a state that wasn't nearly as progressive as Vermont and didn't grow up in extremely progressive places. I kinda don't really care about a candidates policy past unless it's really bad and Clintons is just mixed. What I care about is them admitting they need to do things in order to get votes, which is what she's done. Classic  supporter rhetoric.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
Is there somewhere I can watch this even though it just aired?
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
Also 
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:36
|
|
|
AHH FUGH posted:Also lol looks like a mexican soap opera
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:39
|
|
|
Mister Fister posted:lol looks like a mexican soap opera She's Guatemalan
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
gohmak posted:She's Guatemalan Mexicans hate Guatemalans. You should learn about the latin hierarchy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:46
|
|
|
Typo posted:Bernie is basically a D&D poster which is to say he's a 60s new left hippie who had a hardon for Socialism of USSR and Cuba and willing to excuse the fact that they were dictatorships cuz they were left-wing enough. And he never gave that up even though it's 2016. what a bad post
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 06:52
|
|
|
So did I miss anything good? Did someone really poo poo on Reagan shortly after his wife's passing? If so, yussss
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:10
|
|
|
Epic High Five posted:So did I miss anything good? Did someone really poo poo on Reagan shortly after his wife's passing? If so, yussss https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJOF13eD9bg
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:17
|
|
|
Who won the debate??
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:21
|
|
|
Bernice Anders posted:Who won the debate?? Trump, because they gave him free coverage by bitching about him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:23
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Trump, because they gave him free coverage by bitching about him. In that case Hillary has won every GOP debate Haha nice.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:27
|
|
|
rudatron posted:He keeps going on about this Wall Street though, so maybe he'll use that?!?! Build a wall around Wall Street and deport all the billionaires to the Cayman Islands.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:27
|
|
|
Also according to the Washington Post, Bernie Sanders can't be considered the winner of a debate since he's so far behind in delegates. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news..._politics_pop_b
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:30
|
|
|
Sebadoh Gigante posted:Also according to the Washington Post, Bernie Sanders can't be considered the winner of a debate since he's so far behind in delegates. quote:Bernie Sanders's suit: The man wore a BROWN SUIT. (Or maybe it was blue? No. No, it was brown.) This was basically all anybody could talk about on social media for the first 10 minutes. I think being a journalist at this point is 40% reading Twitter.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 05:27 |
|
|
Dead Cosmonaut posted:New York is pretty progressive No it's not. New York Democrats are republican's because most new yorkers are victims of learned helplessness and don't realize that voting D isn't indicative of anything. e.g. Bloomberg, Cuomo.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2016 07:38
|
|