|
She's stumbling alright
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 07:00 |
|
|
I support a little bit of killing. A little bit of killing is... good.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
Tercio posted:My husband started a national conversation about the death penalty with Ricky Ray Rector.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
What a terrible goddamn answer
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:19
|
|
|
:facepalm:
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
I thought the answer was pretty good, actually. I'm not 100% against the death penalty either. Guy shoots up a school and is 100% clearly guilty? I'm totally down - there's no rehabilitating that. Restricted to the federal level only? I'm totally on board for that, states can get hosed. Boon has issued a correction as of 02:23 on Mar 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
"Is that answer satisfactory for you?" I thought for sure he was gonna say no.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
drat it
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Boon posted:She seems to have answered it pretty well, actually? Nope.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Hillary's low key activism for the abolition of the death penalty there will put her over the top to win this primary.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Fidel Castronaut posted:How was the rally, kids? yooge and luxurious and fun and so full of winning!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Boon posted:I thought the answer was pretty good, actually. Dude almost begged to get locked up again to quit listening to her stumble for a half hour through that response.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Imagine the pantsshitting if a Republican got that question.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Deep Hurting posted:Nope. Oh right, well you told me.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:"Is that answer satisfactory for you?" I thought he was going to take her to task on that mumbling rant, but he let her off the hook. She was really trying to keep things together towards the end of that.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
Boon posted:Oh right, well you told me. She told an exonerated death row inmate that she does not fully oppose the death penalty because 9/11. That enough of an explanation for why her answer loving sucked? Deep Hurting has issued a correction as of 02:25 on Mar 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:23
|
|
|
Deep Hurting posted:She told an exonerated death row inmate that she does not fully oppose the death penalty because 9/11. That enough of an explanation for why her answer loving sucked? Well considering you removed the parts about : - Restricted to the federal level - Reserved for very specific instances So no. Because the question came from someone who got hosed in our lovely, lovely system, doesn't somehow mean the topic is verboten and you trying to paint it as such is ridiculous. If Adam Lanza had been taken alive, I'd be all on board the death penalty train.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:24
|
|
|
THANKS OBAMA
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Imagine the pantsshitting if a Republican got that question. Haven't been watching any Trump lately, huh? A Native American woman asked him if he would apologize to Native Americans for what the U.S. has done to them over the years if he becomes president. He told her he'd look into it, but he's not known for apologies. And that was just this afternoon. He doesn't get rattled and doesn't give a gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
hahaha time to tear down obamacare
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:25
|
|
|
I imagine this lady would have probably qualified for a tax credit or the Medicaid expansion
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
How the living hell did this woman's premiums triple because Obamacare? Does she not know about subsidies or something?
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
She looks like a weird salt shaker in that outfit.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:26
|
|
|
Getting the costs down? Hillary, we have no time for a theoretical debate about this. People have health emergencies! Leave it alone! Obamacare is a jewel!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Talk about the premiums, Hillary
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Boon posted:Well considering you removed all the parts about : Because the federal government is so much better at not executing innocent people it deems "terrorists." It isn't murdering innocent people with drones RIGHT NOW, nope, nope, nope!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
I legit feel bad for Hillary these questions are brutal
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
lol "go shopping" because this lady obviously hosed something up
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
Count Freebasie posted:Haven't been watching any Trump lately, huh? I was thinking more of the "LIBERAL MEDIA  " whining
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:27
|
|
|
i seriously cannot understand what shes saying
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
You have to be a lawyer to understand how to buy insurance now - Hillary
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Tercio posted:Getting the costs down? Hillary, we have no time for a theoretical debate about this. People have health emergencies! Leave it alone! Obamacare is a jewel! Why must she reopen this divisive debate?!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
I wonder if this woman makes like $60,000/year and doesn't qualify for tax credits
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
LMAO "keep shopping. It's your fault, bitch."
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
she's really good at seeming like shes talking... questions so far are quite unfair though
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
Deep Hurting posted:Because the federal government is so much better at not executing innocent people it deems "terrorists." It isn't murdering innocent people with drones RIGHT NOW, nope, nope, nope! This isn't a great argument given Hillary's stance of "restricted instances". Now granted, she MUST define that, however, your argument makes the assumption that it is not possible to ever 100% find someone guilty of a heinous crime. I'd argue that, that is false. When that is the case, I believe the death penalty is viable. I also don't agree that the states should have the right to the sentence. Boon has issued a correction as of 02:31 on Mar 14, 2016 |
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
Alfred P. Pseudonym posted:Why must she reopen this divisive debate?! A better idea will never, ever come to pass!
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
I don't really remember. Was she this no-energy and rambling in 2008?
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
If this lady can easily get ripped off, it's still quite an indictment of the current system.
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 07:00 |
|
|
i mean, yeah Hillary, you're right but that's about the worst thing you could have possibly answered that with "Secretary Clinton, my premiums are really high, and Obamacare made them higher!" "Well obviously you're too dumb to find the right plan. Keep looking until you find a good one dummy!"
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2016 02:29
|
|