|
Helsing posted:I'm not trying to hurt you're feelings. I use the term "goony" because it bears connotations of being mentally and physically unhealthy, socially isolating and aesthetically depressing. All of those are descriptions I'm comfortable using regarding a post that amounts to "I prefer unhealthy prepackaged foods they let me maximize my TV watching time." Sorry but I'm going to go ahead and say you should buy some rice, some veggies, and some dry pasta, familiarize yourself with the stove and oven, and maybe leave the TV off for the evening and crack open a book when you're all done. Many of us are physically, mentally and emotionally exhausted by the time we get home at night. It makes the prospect of doing anything but sitting on the couch and unwinding from that near suicidal form is really unpalatable.
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2016 22:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 20:25 |
|
wateroverfire posted:Convincing consumers to give up some degree of choice would solve a lot of allocation problems but would it make us per se better off? I'd say it depends on the perspective. From the resource and environmental side, yes of course. For being happy and enjoying what your life? Not so much. Much like Bloomburg's attempt to ban salt and butter, though it'd make everyone eat healthier, it'd also make food bland and awful.
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2016 13:58 |
|
Food that isn't spoiled but is going to go to waste otherwise, should be canned, jarred, pickled, dried, frozen or otherwise preserved and given to those who need it.
|
# ¿ Mar 24, 2016 21:22 |