Mr Chips posted:these morons don't realise that the CSIRO's greatest commercialisable successes have come from public good research that wasn't focussed on short term commercial "impact". It's the same thing they are trying to do with public health services, just a different approach.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 06:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 14:48 |
EvilElmo posted:*shrug*
|
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 15:27 |
LibertyCat posted:I was listening to a "please give blood" plea on the radio this morning, and a thought occurred to me - why not (as long as it is medically ok) make Centrelink conditional on being a blood donor? Furthermore, unemployed people are more depressed as a result of their unemployment and the onerous restrictions already placed on them. Firstly, literally sucking out their blood make them more depressed because, poo poo, the only way to get worse than that would be mandatory live organ donation or making them mandatory participants in human experiments. Secondly, they are less healthy to begin with. There is a reason that blood donors are required to be healthy, and it isn't all for the health of those who receive blood. Losing the amount of blood you'd give in a donation is something a healthy person can handle, but it'll gently caress up others. There are also a bunch of religious objections to it. Jehova's Witnesses for instance. Blood also has a shelf life of up to 42 days, so you'd be collecting vastly more blood than would be needed, and almost all of it would have to be destroyed. Finally, you run the very real risk of creation an underground industry in disease infection where people who are unemployed see dealing with some illness to be preferable to being forced to give blood. Also, since current laws preclude males who have had sex with other males, and pregnant women, there will probably be a rise in both. A woman could game the system by getting pregnant repeatedly and aborting over and over again at 18 weeks, for instance. Men have it easier: They can just lie about porking Joel down at the pub. open24hours posted:I don't remember anyone complaining about 'ethics' when people suggested vaccinating your kids should be mandatory. Vaccination: Making people resistant to horrible and potentially lethal diseases, and getting the immunity rates up high enough to protect those who, for whatever reason, cannot be vaccinated (Children, immunocompromised people). Mandatory Blood Donation: A procedure that is supposed to be done only on the healthy would overload screening mechanisms, increasing the risk of disease transmission. The risk of complications, while low, would result in numerous compensation claims against the government since a public good argument cannot be made for mandatory donation (As I said above, blood only stores for a bit over a month, almost all of what's collected under such a regime would be tossed out).
|
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2016 16:52 |
LibertyCat posted:In turn, how many of you are on Centrelink?
|
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 09:28 |
LibertyCat posted:If the policy encourages more people to enter the workforce - isn't that a success?
|
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2016 10:15 |
First Dog is BACK! And here are the kittens. They have grown: And here is a ferocious feral cat showing a human what for:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2016 21:44 |
Freudian Slip posted:Like a pike?
|
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2016 02:28 |
First Dog: Kittens: Yesterday another cat there gave birth. So Even more kittens for you all: And what the gently caress? Another cat there is having kittens (At time of posting, though she is having a long break between them). Here you go:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2016 09:13 |
This article should be required reading for everyone:Alarmism, economic idiocy, and Orwellian appointments: three years of political disaster posted:How to explain the trainwreck that is the last three years of the federal government? The debacle poses a challenge that will dog journalists, policy wonks and historians for decades to come. The explanations for its dysfunction and sustained under-achievement are complex, but there are at least two distinct theories worth considering.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 08:20 |
First Dog: Kittens!
|
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2016 08:03 |
Higsian posted:If the Liberals adopt a quota that might mean unqualified people get selected
|
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2016 14:29 |
LibertyCat posted:While the dude in my av is growing on me I really want my Leyonhjelm's Cat av back
|
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2016 08:21 |
It is time for a reading from the First book of Dog: Oh, and some kittens:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2016 02:58 |
First Dog: Kittens from above:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2016 10:37 |
Gods this is bad. Bike chat may be our only hope:'Four wheels good, two wheels bad': NSW's war on cyclists continues posted:It’s been over a month since the new “cycling safety” rules came into force in New South Wales. Despite the protests of numerous cycling groups armed with a petition of over 10,000 signatures and a disallowance motion tabled in state parliament by Greens MP, Mehreen Faruqi, the government appears intent on punishing two-wheeled human-powered road users.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2016 07:54 |
First Dog on the Reef: Felines:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2016 08:15 |
Jumpingmanjim posted:https://twitter.com/NatalieKotsios/status/723466936609181696 Consequences like this: Labor refers Sophie Mirabella's claims to auditor general over $10m ‘political retribution’ posted:Labor has asked the auditor general to investigate Sophie Mirabella’s claims her former electorate did not receive $10m in hospital funding because it voted her out, arguing it smacks of “political retribution”.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2016 15:34 |
hooman posted:I always do. Also I have twice been hit by cars while riding on footpaths, one time of which my head hit the ground hard enough to break my helmet!
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2016 05:56 |
I have to ask. Can people who post facebook links either quote the content or screencap it for those of us who refuse to touch facebook. Quoting or screencapping also hedges against the comments being deleted (This bit also applies to twitter stuff).
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2016 15:33 |
First Dog: Also, many kitten pictures:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2016 11:08 |
First Dog: Box of kittens, as seen from above:
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2016 08:06 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 14:48 |
LibertyCat posted:tbh if push came to shove I could easily see the government backing out of the treaty and selling it as no longer relevant and overly generous, why should we honor it when Indonesia doesn't, and who wants the UN telling us we can't make our own laws anyway. Your position here is basically "We should ever do anything good at all because someone else isn't and/or probably won't and why should we be the only ones doing good things?" It was written after the events of the early 1940's where a bunch of people denied refugee status got killed in a little thing called "the holocaust". You might have heard of it. There are similar purges (Though not on quite that scale, or with that level of publicity) going on today in countries like Iraq, Syria, Sri Lanka, and the like. You know, those countries where these refugees are coming from? Even Iran, as allegedly moderate as it is, does some pretty horrific poo poo to its people. This is the kind of thing you get when the west deposes governments they do not agree with in order to put radicals who oppose someone they don't like in power. Or when they bomb the country into rubble in an attempt to make friends.
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2016 17:07 |