Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!



Empire was a film that was always waiting to be made.

Since the invention of the movie camera, the earliest films were of simple scenes or objects. The Lumiere brothers shot trains, gardens, static shots focused on a single moment. As film grew beyond these short scenes and evolved into a medium for feature-length storytelling, the novelty of a single object on camera quickly disappeared. It was no longer a spectacle simply to see an object move before your face. It was commonplace and mainstream audiences looking for entertainment grabbed on to movies as means for excitement, laughs, and mindlessness.

But Empire was always waiting in the subconscious. It was a possibility, an inevitability at that. Theoretically you could make an eight hour film that was a single, unmoving shot of a building. And because it could happen, it had to happen. It took until 1964 for Andy Warhol to do it.

Empire is a film made in defiance of the idea of cinema as a sensory experience. If anything it is more like a sensory deprivation chamber. It is meant for you to get lost in a single, flickering image. It is meant to deprive you of sound, music, narrative. If you're not bored watching Empire then Warhol has failed. The Lumiere's machine printed spectacle to celluloid; Warhol's films are anti-spectacle.

I can't say I've actually watched Empire in it's 485 minute entirety - few people can. Part of it is that I doubt I could get through it in a single sitting, another part of it is I'm not even sure where you can find a complete copy. One hour-long edits are floating around the internet, but never the complete version. You'd either have to have access to a print and a projector, or be lucky enough to live near a museum or a miraculously still-functioning avant-garde arthouse theater in order to see it proper. But Empire was never about really watching it, now was it? It's about the idea. It's a theoretical film meant more to be talked about and mythologized than actually watched "proper." Like other experimental projects, such as 24 Hour Psycho, you subject yourself to as much as you can until you feel you've gotten the idea and move on to the next piece in the museum. Some may argue me on this point - critic and filmmaker Jonas Mekas notably raved that all of Warhol's works demanded complete viewing (his jaw later dropped when Warhol ditched a screening of one of his own films within minutes, leaving Mekas to watch the entire static shot by himself).

One person who has watched the entire piece is critic J.J. Murphy, author of "The Black Hole of the Camera: The Films of Andy Warhol." In the book, Murphy calls Empire "a cosmic film" and describes the soaring, ethereal feeling the film creates when watched in its entirety in the cold darkness of a theater. There is a majestic quality to the image. Although internet bootlegs have rendered the picture muddy and pixelated, the crisp screenshots of the movie as it should be are stunningly beautiful - left to be interpreted endlessly. Is the building a triumph of mankind? A glowing tower to success? An eyesore in the night sky? Maybe a Freudian phallic joke? What we do know is that it never moves. A building is a building and it will stand motionless and erect until a wrecking ball tears into its sides. The building is there, it does not change.

What of the name? Empire? Is it a critique on American politics? A tribute? Or just thoughtless naming along the lines of his other static movies like Sleep and Eat and Blow Job? As you can see, I have a lot more questions about Empire than I do answers.

I'll end this talking a little bit about the production. The movie was filmed in a single night from July 25th to the 26th, 1964 from the 41st floor of the Time Life Building. Mekas served as cinematographer and during several reel changes, his and Warhol's reflections can be seen in the window. But oddly enough, as many critics have suggested over the years, Warhol's movie is not cinema verite or reality as it is or in any way the unedited truth of the world. Empire does not take place in real time. The movie was shot at 24 frames per second and initially ran 6 hours and 36 minutes. In editing, Warhol slowed down the film to 16 frames per second, extending it to be 8 hours and 5 minutes. So when you watch Empire, you are actually watching the Empire State Building in slow motion. Think about that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMCeDBn1Zu0


The Complete Movie of the Month Listing:
1776 | 2001: A Space Odyssey | 24 Hour Party People | 8 1/2 | The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the 8th Dimension | Aguirre: The Wrath of God | All That Jazz |American Movie | A Midnight Clear | The Babadook | Baraka | The Battle of Algiers | Being There | Beyond the Valley of the Dolls | Bicycle Thief | Black Hawk Down | Blade | Branded to Kill | The Brave Little Toaster | Breaking Away | The Bridge on the River Kwai | Brief Encounter | Bullet in the Head | Charade | Chitty Chitty Bang Bang | Close-Up | The Conversation | The Cook, The Thief, His Wife, and Her Lover | Day For Night | The Court Jester | Death Race 2000 | Dead Man | Darkman | Detour | Devils on the Doorstep | Do the Right Thing | Double Indemnity | Downfall | Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde | El Topo | Falling Down | A Face In The Crowd | Fanny and Alexander | Fat City | Funny Bones | Galaxy Quest | Ghost Dog: Way of the Samurai | Glengarry Glen Ross | Gremlins 2: The New Batch | Horor of Dracula | La Haine | The Ice Storm | The Intruder | It's a Wonderful Life | Judgement at Nuremberg | Jumanji | The King of Comedy | Last Train From Gun Hill | The Leopard | The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp | Little Shop of Horrors | Living in Oblivion | The Long Goodbye | Love & Death | M | Masculin Féminin | Man on Fire | The Man Who Would Be King | Modern Times | The Monster Squad | Mousehunt | Mulholland Drive | My Best Friend's Wedding | My Darling Clementine | My Own Private Idaho | Naked | Outland | The Panic in Needle Park | Peeping Tom | Planes, Trains, and Automobiles | Play Time | The Proposition | Punishment Park | The Pusher Trilogy | Rififi/Rashômon | Red Angel | The Ref | Rock 'n' Roll High School | Ronin | The Rules of the Game | Safe | Schizopolis | Son of Frankenstein | The Squid and the Whale | Stop Making Sense | The Super Inframan | Sunset Boulevard | Surviving The Game | The Sweet Hereafter | The Third Man | Titicut Follies | Vampyr | The Vanishing | Videodrome | The Wild Bunch | Wit | Withnail & I | The Young Girls of Rochefort | Zardoz

TrixRabbi fucked around with this message at 03:34 on Apr 2, 2016

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!

Zogo posted:

This is one I've wanted to see for some time but like Napoleon and Greed I've been stubbornly waiting until the end of time for the full versions to appear in 8K or something. There's an 8+ hour one on Youtube but the quality is horrendous and it might be looped.

Yeah I'm pretty sure that one's a fake loop and I can't imagine looking at that muddy picture for so long. I would highly recommend checking out Napoleon though regardless of if it's complete or not. The triptych isn't likely to be available soon as far as I can tell and I can't imagine it would look great on a TV anyway. But it's just a drat good, action-packed movie and well worth seeing. And there's some good quality versions out there.

As for Greed, well the 4 hour version is probably the best you're going to get barring a miracle.

But yeah, I would love to see Empire get some sort of multi-disc release, even if just for colleges. I know the materials are out there, I imagine it's just the sense that it was never meant to be watched in a living room. It really is more something that belongs as a part of a museum exhibit. Have you watched any other Warhol? A lot of his stuff is much more watchable and entertaining in an oddball sort of way. Other stuff that is more pure artistry, but a lot shorter, like Blow Job, is definitely worth tracking down. Blow Job is an interesting one as it's only 30 minutes, but the man's face and the shadows begin to contort and it becomes a very surreal experience.

TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!

I've been trying to find a decent quality version of Tom, Tom the Piper's Son. If I can't see it on a big screen then I'd like to at least have a version that isn't muddy and pixelated. That seems to defeat the purpose. But again, I think Jacobs is very restrictive with his films and most of them are only available at University prices (I remember seeing him charge several hundred dollars for a copy of Star Spangled to Death).

Zogo posted:

I've seen his acting:

Anybody else hungry now?

TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!

The Warhol film I've been trying to track down forever but can never find is Taylor Mead's rear end.

TrixRabbi
Aug 20, 2010

Time for a little robot chauvinism!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1JI_shx3n0

Thanks to YouTube, it really is it's own genre now.

  • Locked thread