The New York Times supports Child Pornography

Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography

rudatron: May 31, 2011; by Fluffdaddy

Not really seeing what the issue of debate here, unless you're seriously suggesting that teens should face legal repercussions for sexting to each other, which doesn't seem fair or just. I'm not totally against the idea that you can exploit yourself, and that there should be legal measures to prevent that, to protect you from yourself, but using punishments on the victim is kind of extreme. I'm also not sure young adults are necessarily exploiting themselves, so much as exploring one of many social interactions. Which they should have both the freedom to do, safeguarded from anyone on the outside, and countermeasures against possible abuse that might occur, inside that space.

# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 02:52

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 14, 2024 22:37

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography