The New York Times supports Child Pornography

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography

Archonex: May 2, 2012; MY OPINION IS SEERS OF THE THRONE PROPAGANDA IGNORE MY GNOSIS-IMPAIRED RAMBLINGS

Jarmak posted:

Like seriously what is this retarded poo poo? "We must put young girls in jail to prevent them from forcing their home made child porn on me!"

You're talking to the guy who drug down that (admittedly horrible to begin with) gender pronouns thread and notably said that he felt that a woman who didn't look pretty or dress feminine enough wasn't entitled to be called a woman. IE: He'd call them a man to their face.

Dude is sexist and creepy as gently caress. This is just an extension of that. You're surprised that someone like that would to try to throw blame onto the girl or boy for viewing child pornography?

Edit:

Commie NedFlanders posted:

Of course, but what stops them from doing it again an again in their search for attention?

Also, what does it mean if it's not criminal for them to publish that garbage, but it because they are doing so, it comes up on my rss fees or newsfeed or wherever.

Will people be held criminally liable for seeing these obscene images, lumped into the same group as Jared from subway, while the producers and distributors have no consequences?

Are you talking hypotheticals here or something? Because what sort of RSS or "news" feed would you be subscribed too that hands you a stream of child pornography? The only ones that would do that are the creepy redditor sort of feeds. And they're nothing like news. :stare:

Archonex fucked around with this message at 01:24 on Apr 6, 2016

# ¿ Apr 6, 2016 01:11

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 14, 2024 00:05

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography