Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography
 
  • Locked thread
suck my woke dick
Oct 10, 2012

:siren:I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!:siren:

Put this cum-loving slave on ignore immediately!

Jarmak posted:

This is trivial to do unless the original sending and receiving device are both unavailable.

In which case I'm kinda okay with people not being legally allowed to actively preserve naked pictures of their 15 year old high school girlfriend/boyfriend for ages after that person would rather they not have that anymore.

Your solution is possibly the most unenforceable scheme I can possibly think of.

I can't think of a reason to drag it up though, because that would also criminalise people who merely forgot they still have girlfriend/boyfriend pics.

* # ¿ Apr 6, 2016 19:50
  • Quote
Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 15, 2024 17:09
  • Quote
  • Locked thread
The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > The New York Times supports Child Pornography