|
Prepare to be disappointed.
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 18:39 |
|
|
It's good to see they are being faithful to the comic Civil War in one aspect at least.
|
|
#
¿
May 6, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
Toxxupation posted:Also, and more importantly, X-Men But Boring and Bad. Fixed friend
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2016 03:33
|
|
|
Toxxupation posted:Wait...that's not fixed! That's not fixed at all! I like the X-men! Not the current X-men, but they were good once!
|
|
#
¿
May 9, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
muscles like this? posted:I never understand people who claim movie critics/videogame journalists are paid off by big companies. All it takes is one person blowing the whistle and the companies would be in big trouble. Paying and giving benefits to make critics like you is a thing. The idea that one big company is able to freeze out another big company by doing that is not.
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2016 04:32
|
|
|
Any character can make money if you put the effort and cash into it. There really isn't any difference between say Iron Man pre RDJ and Black Knight as far as the general public is concerned. That is why saying so an so could never work as a movie doesn't work, because as far as the general public cares they are all the same. Outside if a few properties of course.
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
Heathen posted:What is fun? Beep boop. Somewhere Zack frowns, not knowing why.
|
|
#
¿
May 15, 2016 17:27
|
|
|
It's the second best individual movies.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2016 08:04
|
|
|
SonicRulez posted:Still no. Even if you disqualify Guardians and Cap 3. What is better? Iron Man 1? loving Thor? Also it's better than Guardians by a mile.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2016 18:44
|
|
|
loving why. No one chooses to watch Thor, it just happens.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
X-O posted:"Should Batman sit down?" He then must never stand up while this chair exists.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2016 06:24
|
|
|
Iron Man is fun for the origin then it just drags itself to the finish line, wheezing the whole way.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2016 07:43
|
|
|
Spider totems are fine.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
ImpAtom posted:Yeah, Spider Totems get too much flack. There are bad Spider-Totem stories but there are also good ones, not only by JMS but other authors too. They're a goofy minor plot point that gets brought up when it's convenient for a plot which is about on-par with any of the other random bit of Spider-Errata and they actually make sense if in a bit too much of a pat-and-neat way. The full extent of it is kinda poorly done but even The Other was used well with Scarlet Spider so it's a case of finding the right slot for it. I am the guy who likes the other. Also JMS is my favorite ASM run.
|
|
#
¿
May 20, 2016 23:34
|
|
|
First class was about Mags/Charles. The rest were afterthoughts.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2016 01:30
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:This is, uh, pretty solid casual racism. The Chinese have evolved a love of superheroes to combat their native predators, the Mongols. Where did you even get your degree?
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2016 19:27
|
|
|
Soonmot posted:No, because First Class has a lot of screen time of actors other than Fassbender, Macavoy, and Bacon and all those scenes are terrible. Yeah you can't admit something that ain't true. Honestly X2 is the best X-men movie by a mile. Most are bad.
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2016 19:09
|
|
|
Storm was barely in the original trilogy? How small did you want it to be.
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 18:38
|
|
|
I honestly don't know what you are talking about. Are you being sarcastic here. Storm was not centerstage at all CharlestheHammer fucked around with this message at 18:54 on May 29, 2016 |
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 18:51
|
|
|
That is what she was tho. Like am I remembering them differently?
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 19:11
|
|
|
That isn't making her centerstage, it's giving her something to do, which the original trilogy struggled with.
|
|
#
¿
May 29, 2016 19:29
|
|
|
To be fair that is also how comics apocalypse operates.
|
|
#
¿
May 31, 2016 04:51
|
|
|
I never thought I would see someone defend the weird no girls toys thing. Though is it really defending it if your argument sucks? Makes you think.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
Welcome to marketing son.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2016 05:34
|
|
|
BrianWilly posted:Just to be absolutely clear -- and this is not me defending any of Singer's skeevy tendencies, but just to lay out all the facts -- the man who accused him of rape has since been arrested for an investment fraud scheme. This is not relevant in any matter, why did you think this is a good idea.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 6, 2016 21:49
|
|
|
Alan Moore was the rape guy of the 80s tho
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
He's not wrong tho
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
The killing joke is his weakest work by far.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Uncle Boogeyman posted:I mean it's not as bad as Neonomicon but yeah it's not top tier Moore. I forgot about Neonomicon, so fair point.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
Hush is real bad tho
|
|
#
¿
Jun 11, 2016 01:46
|
|
|
Most those people have their themes forced on them by random chance or science experiment gone wrong. Bruce is just insane
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 05:17
|
|
|
Addressing feudalism is about 400 years late mate. So is compassionate royalty for that matter
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2016 05:19
|
|
|
To be fair compassionate Monarchy or enlighten despotism was a thing more in theory than practice. You usually have to make huge exceptions for it to work.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2016 07:37
|
|
|
Hakkesshu posted:why They are extremely lame conceptually and are horribly shoe horned. The books themselves are at best okay, they don't do anything particularly interesting but they are not bad either.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
Yeah I don't think you get consequence, as that isn't it. Him being resurrected isn't a consequence, as the other choice, letting him live, would most likely have ended in the same manner.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2016 17:33
|
|
|
That is actually a problem with the movie, Batman does a complete turnaround for no reason once the acceptance threshold is breached. Sloppy writing for sure.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2016 17:40
|
|
|
greatn posted:That depends on whether or not you buy the "Martha" moment. A lot of people don't. It worked really well for me though. It was a Paul on the road to Damascus moment where Batman saw what he was becoming and remembered why her became Batman in the first place and realized Superman wasn't his enemy. A lot of people thought it was hokey or stupid. I didn't. That was the films real resolution. Doomsday afterwards if anything was an unnecessary fourth act. But it was an unnecessary fourth act I thought was really fun to watch and visually pretty. I am actually arguing from the standpoint that that scene is fine, but it shouldn't have fostered the interactions that followed. Batman was unhinged and paranoid, so he shouldn't have been that buddy buddy that quickly. It's like all the mistrust just evaporated instantly.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2016 17:56
|
|
|
Suicide Squad as a whole is trying to hard to be fair.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 25, 2016 18:10
|
|
|
None of those movies have a female lead, one of the characters is female which might qualify.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2016 07:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 4, 2024 18:39 |
|
|
Chaos Hippy posted:You're arguing with CharlesTheHammer. Why even bother? He can't admit when he is wrong. Also Luke is barely the protagonist till Return and the bad ones didn't actually introduce anyone close to a protagonist till at least clones and even then ehhhh. So Star Wars has a history of this.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 2, 2016 21:17
|
|