|
I'm gonna play as America and do my customary "Make the Phillippines into a Vietnam-esque boondoggle for the Japanese" then come in a year or two later and BTFO japan with my shiny new toys I built with all the industry I get unless HoI4 railroads again
|
# ¿ May 19, 2016 22:41 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 20:41 |
|
DOMDOM posted:What makes me sad about this statement is that it basically says Germans can't be trusted without censorship and handholding, but I'll bite my tongue as the rest of this argument belongs in d&d What are you supposed to do? Just let Nazis get elected again?
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 02:40 |
|
One thing that worries me about HoI4 is that you need "naval supremacy" to conduct a naval invasion. In WW2 there were many invasions done with one side having an air force/navy. Like Guadalcanal where the IJN showed up. Or Port Moresby where the USN showed up. Etc... WIll we be able to launch invasions despite the enemy having a navy or do we have to dismantle their entire fleet before we can even invade small islands in the outer pacific.
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 15:45 |
|
If you want Nazi symbols so bad just downliad the day 1 DLC for ut Pdox is providing.
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 17:36 |
|
Empress Theonora posted:it's a copy/paste from the official forums Nazi grogs tricked me again
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 17:43 |
|
They should just set the German flag to a hardcoded "nazi punks gently caress off" album cover
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 17:59 |
|
1337JiveTurkey posted:Of course one of the mod ideas that seems to be getting the most community interest is one that adds in the CSA. Tbh i would love that so I could burn the south down again
|
# ¿ May 20, 2016 18:20 |
|
I just hope tonnage is in from HoI3 I liked seeing Japans economy fail before my eyes as I strangled it to death with a horde of submarines
|
# ¿ May 21, 2016 00:31 |
|
Option to form Rome as Italy under Emperor Mussolius Imperial Subjugation cassus belli against France, Spain, Portugal, UK, Benelux and greece
|
# ¿ May 21, 2016 00:43 |
|
Stairmaster posted:but for some reason not turkey? No
|
# ¿ May 21, 2016 00:47 |
|
I tgink HoI4 has its poo poo together. But yea USA for learning since its like impossible to lose
|
# ¿ May 22, 2016 20:17 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:The OOB and TOE could be fleshed out. Military formations without artillery would have been unthinkable in 1916, let alone 1936. Artillery is a battalion level attachment for your divisions You donr get artillery divisions
|
# ¿ May 22, 2016 21:42 |
|
Enjoy posted:How do you know what the default attachments are Theres an entire dev diary about it plus streams
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 00:58 |
|
Don't you see the big ARTILLERY icon in the support section?
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 15:43 |
|
ArchangeI posted:That's a single company when the historical division had about ten times that. No they didnt have 200 pieces of artillery Infantry guns, field guns, mortars and such do not refer to artillery
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 17:11 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:It says they have 24 155mm guns, but that each regiment also has a battery, as well as AT, AA, infantry guns and mortars. Let me reiterate mortars, field guns, AT guns, AA guns, and infantry guns are not artillery Artillery specifically refers to actual artillery guns and nothing else. All of those other things either fall into: 1. Their own support company 2. Infantry research, just like HoI3 (infantry support tech) Phi230 fucked around with this message at 17:26 on May 23, 2016 |
# ¿ May 23, 2016 17:23 |
|
Infantry were used to invade the USSR The invasion of the USSR failed Therefore infantry are a failure Mechas are the only way
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 17:48 |
|
Wooper posted:Are you still going on about this. This Thw game has many abstractions. If you are concerned about exact TOEs and poo poo play a legit grog game
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 18:01 |
|
Triggerhappypilot posted:I am concerned that the naval combat is a lot weaker than the land combat. While it's pretty clear that the granularity of combat is a lot bigger than games like War in the East, land combat still looks like it has great potential for maneuver warfare, whereas navy combat looks like it's just "ships gonna fight each other in the same place, better have more ships in one place than the other guy." Thats pretty much what naval combat is. At the level of abstraction (strategic level) we have thats the best you can do. You would have to make a tactical game to do good navies unless youre War In The Pacific
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 18:28 |
|
LordArgh posted:i do not envy paradox being a target of the level of sperginess exhibited in this thread Youre surprised that a historical wargame has a bunch of pedants as fans?
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:04 |
|
LordArgh posted:my favorite was the one who wanted them to model multiple varieties of german assault guns I don't see a problem with a historical wargame modelling historical war machines
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:08 |
|
By the same logic why not just complain about having different tanks all together just have one tank that is shared between all factions because actually adding in real tanks is for nerds
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:11 |
|
Sharzak posted:Wait what? Every factions medium tank or whatever is going to be identical? Identical in literally every way except for the icon on the production screen and the name. Unless you buy the sprites, then the sprite will be different too.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:36 |
|
Hitlers Gay Secret posted:I just want to be able to send my army of 100,000 troops into another army of 100,000 troops and pray to the RNG gods I win, not this tactical bullshit. Who the gently caress cares who's tanks are better when it should just be "who has the larger army"? Why can't I just spend 1. You can't fireball dresden because Paradox won't show bad things that happen in war 2. Careful what you wish for. Stellaris. Also your entire argument is flawed because the mana is called
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:42 |
|
Drone posted:No, its because it's illegal and frankly insensitive to depict it in Paradox's second-best market. Not that I care if its in the game or not, but why would it be illegal? And why would it be insensitive? Strategic bombing is already in the game. Firebombing IS strategic bombing. What do you think they're dropping and who do you think they're dropping them on. No more insensitive than playing as Germany. Every province you take, you know what goes on in during the "occupation." I'll give you a hint, its not just adding grey stripes everywhere.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:47 |
|
Triggerhappypilot posted:Hearts of Iron IV desperately needs multiplayer nuremburg trials Would play this tbh It would be like Ace Attorney except you get to hang nazis instead
|
# ¿ May 23, 2016 20:51 |
|
Let me remind everyone that HoI4 comes out in 2 weeks so we only have 14 days to this thread into the ground so we have stuff to complain about when the game comes
|
# ¿ May 24, 2016 00:34 |
|
Its just gonna be a forced declared war
|
# ¿ May 24, 2016 04:04 |
|
Ive also heard that you need resources + equipment to repair
|
# ¿ May 24, 2016 14:54 |
|
Came in to see like 40 new posts All about loving assault gun drama Fantastic, keep up the good work. Almost 7 days left! Gotta poo poo up the thread even worse until release day.
|
# ¿ May 25, 2016 22:15 |
|
Just so you guys know you can make multiple variants and have them all in service. poo poo you could theoretically have some of every vehicle in the game in active service at the same time with the really cool looking production system
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 00:39 |
|
The worst part is "assault guns" are functionally in the game. Just make a TD with high whatever relevant stat and low armor or whatever your heart desires.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 17:33 |
|
To be fair, the 3d models in action look so cluttered and confusing I would rather have clean, easy to read counters than like 30 guys standing doing a gun firing animation and you don't know who is who. Like have you seen the videos of the combat up close? Its borderline impossible to figure out whats happening, especially with air combat. It looks like somebody vomiting in real time, there's so much poo poo thats impossible to discern between. Where's that gif of Germany invading Holland. That's specifically what I'm referring to.
|
# ¿ May 26, 2016 17:56 |
|
Details are for nerds more than one generic infantry/tank/airplane per faction is for nerds every faction should be exactly the same in every way There should also be no terrain. Adding terrain to account for is so groggy. Terrain is for spergs. So get rid of terrain entirely. Who cares where they are fighting as long as they are fighting right? I don't care what temperature it is, or if there's mountains. God what nerds. Weather is out too. Phi230 fucked around with this message at 21:02 on May 26, 2016 |
# ¿ May 26, 2016 20:58 |
|
dtkozl posted:The interesting thing about the sherman is it never got a reputation for burning easily among the russians because as it turns out it burned less frequently than the t34. Most russian designs had worse ammo storage than even american tanks due to their tight design and often had ammo just rolling around on the turret floor. No, because other armies didn't make their tanks as lovely as the Italians
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 00:30 |
|
dtkozl posted:Japan built a tank with the gun pointing the wrong way. Japan and Italy had the worst tanks ever it is known
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 00:33 |
|
Watching World War Wednesday the game looks good. Fingers crossed they don't pull another stellaris. 1 week, 5 days.
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 01:31 |
|
God dammit I want this game already
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 15:09 |
|
Loosely related: A demo of a multiplayer coop U-boat simulator came out today called HMS Marulken and its awesome. We ought to get a goon crew going, with me obviously as her valiant captain. Download here http://hmsmarulken.se/
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 16:17 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 20:41 |
|
Smoremaster posted:this looks cool as hell, downloading it now If anybody wants to get a game going add me on steam Phi230
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 19:58 |