Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003

Microwaves Mom posted:

Come to think of it one or two of the Muslim kids I was friends with back in the day would always blame the jews for everything...

I wonder if anyone I know that is currently Muslim does that too. I'll have to try and bait it out of them.

Gaza/Palestine is guaranteed to make "moderate" muslims break character. Just mention some atrocity committed there and see them start foaming at the mouth.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

NihilismNow
Aug 31, 2003
IANAL but copyright isn't the relevant law but portraitright is.
Based on this she could object because she has a "reasonable interest". Normally she could claim her privacy is being violated but since the photo in question shows her publishing a photo of herself in the same situation the question is how valid a complaint this is. A Belgian judge would have to weigh the public interest against her private interest. She is free to start a case against the owner of the copyright of the photograph. She might win (eventually, many months from now). Just screaming "Mah copyright" is not sufficient for Belgian law.

  • Locked thread