|
meatpimp's submissions submitted.
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2016 13:20
|
|
EVERYWHERE 
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 05:00 |
|
|
Thanks again for your work on this, MrChips, it's always great fun. I'm looking forward to another solid mid-pack finish!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 13, 2016 11:58
|
|
|
Liquid Communism posted:Three fires, one deer-related wreck, and two scrapped for me. The deer-totaled Envoy is the first one in... poo poo... 30+ cars that I didn't sell. And I hate selling cars.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 12:21
|
|
|
1500quidporsche posted:Everyone answered the second question wrong. I want to hear some reasons why the 80s produced bad cars because the only bad cars made in that period were American. The 80s were a bad hybrid of '70s manufacturing trying to get to '90s reliability. That resulted in a whole lot of garbage, particularly in the early '80s. By '86, I remember remarking that most any car made would be reasonably reliable (and I was talking about a Sunfire/Cavalier at the time !!!). The beginning of the decade, though, was the introduction of electronics to cars, which was almost always a way to result in  I partially agree with MrChips in that, due to production and worldwide disruption, the '40s was a piss-poor decade, but by simply listing some rare non-turds that came about in the '70s, you do not begin to part the tide of the poo poo-torrent of garbage that was produced in the beginning-of-emissions era.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2016 00:22
|
|
|
Found the two circle jerk questions. (I went Gulf for sheep points, JPS for reals.) The Stig was a pro choice. I'm surprised only one of y'all picked Schumacher. meatpimp fucked around with this message at 23:27 on Jun 15, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 15, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
The Locator posted:And the rapid slide to mediocrity begins!  I called another middle finish as soon as I pressed the "send" button. Gotta say, Terrist, ShittyPostmakerPro is kicking your butt. You're both gunning for wolf, but at least his answers are plausible and not complete non-sequiturs. meatpimp fucked around with this message at 23:48 on Jun 16, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:Do I look like I care? For the effort put into wolfing, yes.  quote:Seriously guys - that wasn't a cheat. A very clever reading of the rules, allowed to race and banned afterwards. However... And that, I think, is the definition of the best cheat. meatpimp fucked around with this message at 00:30 on Jun 17, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 00:25
|
|
|
There was only 1 generation of PT Cruiser, you dolts.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
TheFonz posted:Nowhere did it say it had to be multiple generations, you dolt. You really should look up the definition of "each."
|
|
#
¿
Jun 18, 2016 11:19
|
|
|
For the next sheep game there should be a question "Which car started out awesome, but got progressively worse throughout each iteration / generation." The answer is obvious, but many would get it wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 00:10
|
|
|
Why are there only two engines in the teaser? (aren't an LS and a 1955 both "Chevy Small Blocks"?)
meatpimp fucked around with this message at 21:35 on Jun 19, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 21:23
|
|
|
CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:The earlier SBC and the LSx are so different, they cant be called the same engine. Like for the fact one is cast iron, the other is alloy. Disagree. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_small-block_engine
|
|
#
¿
Jun 19, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
Awwww... it's almost over. Sheep time is best time.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 21, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 05:00 |
|
|
literally a fish posted:oh jesus we're evolving No, I think we're normalizing I, too like the data at the end. Another well-done game, MrChips. Thanks again!
|
|
#
¿
Jun 23, 2016 15:19
|
|