|
Starshark posted:Off-topic but how did the internet discover the phrase 'pearl clutchers'? Six months ago it's no-where to be seen and now it's everywhere. A slate article from 2012 says it was already a cliche in feminist circles at that time. http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/01/pearl_clutching_how_the_phrase_became_a_feminist_blog_clich_.html Pretty sure its recent popularity has actually come from MRAs though.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2016 07:50 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 19:05 |
|
CrazyTolradi posted:I thought all millennials hated their parents and did the opposite of what they were told? Here comes dat boi
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2016 08:09 |
|
Starshark posted:No. I'm not even surprised he's doubling down. Click on a tweet and then just c/p the url straight in. It's all automatic.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2016 16:26 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXMej__yTmE
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2016 03:09 |
|
Doctor Spaceman posted:Minimum income proposals aren't inherently left or right wing. Yeah, but the right's far more likely to hold the view that the pain of being in poverty is the only thing that motivates scroungers and that basic income would see plummeting productivity as bludgers sit on the couch collecting cheques.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2016 16:35 |
|
BBJoey posted:the current US election shows that self-proclaimed liberals are more than happy to take this view of the world WhiskeyWhiskers posted:the right
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2016 00:11 |
|
Source your quotes
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2016 07:54 |
|
quote:one would want people to see Marxism as a doctrine of liberation of the things most oppressing them, not the advancement of Idealist notions of gender and sexuality that they have never subscribed to.
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2016 12:22 |
|
sidviscous posted:I think it's an awful lot of words to say "your genitals are the be and all end-all of gender and loving get over it and stop letting the conservatives link it with marxism because I'm a marxist and it's making me look bad" Yeah this is exactly what it is, mixed in with a failed prolier-than-thou, "All these marxists are students and academics, not blue collar workers like myself a real dirt-under-the-fingernails journalist."
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 05:21 |
|
Yeah but I heard that thorium would make an entirely safe and cheap power supply with absolutely no weapons produceable waster and it's the Greens fault that we're still using co-
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 11:45 |
|
So what happens if doctors don't follow this deal and instead keep children from being returned to detention? Surely the association can't override a doctor's ruling of the need to provide duty of care? The libs could hardly go back on the deal, that would be an image nightmare.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2016 14:26 |
|
Anidav posted:Isn't Malcolm not showing up kinda damaging to Malcolm or does no one care about Sky News? It's a terrible idea for Malcolm because no one cares about Sky News, but other media outlets are probably going to run stories on how much of a loser he is for not showing up.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 11:07 |
|
Cleretic posted:They're also too identifiable to be able to do much with their stunts. They were good in the Howard era not just because Howard and his time gave them a lot to play with, but also because they were still targets small enough that they didn't have their faces plastered on blacklists. They were able to fly under the radar enough to make a spectacle right in the face of someone important. Yeah this was actually on show in that episode. One of the women was able to give Plibersek and Shorten a rat, while Craig got told to gently caress off by security at the Turnbull thing.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 15:55 |
|
Should have been listening during RE mate. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu5bBDRpzPM starkebn posted:Isn't there something in the bible about this? This isn't a problem people haven't seen coming. gently caress should have read the rest of the thread first. WhiskeyWhiskers fucked around with this message at 07:01 on Jun 9, 2016 |
# ¿ Jun 9, 2016 06:58 |
|
Yeah pretty sure it was the dude who pissed off Poseidon.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2016 14:50 |
|
hooman posted:That's not very environmentally friendly, we want sustainable multiple use killing machines. Not if you pronounce it correctly it doesn't.
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2016 04:03 |
|
tbf to the coppers, a pair of scissors are like double the knife! So what's the deal with not randomising the ballot papers? Just to make the job easier for vote counters and scrutineers?
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2016 06:43 |
|
Cleretic posted:Someone gave me a red title for having bad opinions back in February, and I still don't know which opinions they were. The right reaction to Fallout. I've been playing it again recently and there's just so much poo poo that's lazy.
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2016 11:50 |
|
Tommofork posted:Funnily enough they probably think the Democrats are still a party. Someone tried to tell them, but they said it too quietly.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2016 08:00 |
|
Periphery posted:The requirement to have paid staff on scene before work is allowed to commence has some serious implications for the CFA, the CFA volunteers and the safety and success of operations. It also has to have some fairly significant funding impacts as well. Who is forking out the cash for the changes? I thought the paid staff requirement was only for stations with both volunteers and paid staff. It really doesn't seem that drastic. Maybe I'm wrong though?
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2016 12:24 |
|
DancingShade posted:Also gently caress preferencing and all that bullshit. I number every single relevant box because gently caress your backroom deals. Well make sure you don't this time and exhaust your vote before reaching all the shitheel right wingers.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2016 12:02 |
|
AgentF posted:What's the theory here? If your vote is exhausted before it reaches the right-wingers then doesn't it mean that the non-right wingers have lost anyway and been eliminated? In that case, wouldn't you want your vote to go to the least horrible right-winger? I could be wrong, but isn't this all sorts of hosed because of quotas, your first preferences might get well above their quotas and have that run off to your second preferences and so on? So in the end if everyone you want gets above their quota your vote could be directed to someone you don't want. I suppose you're still right that it might be better even then to direct your preference to the least objectionable, but I'd still be exhausting it before I got near the neo-nazis.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2016 19:03 |
|
cum_dumpster posted:i see you have nothing worthwhile to contribute as usual.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2016 04:22 |
|
Personally I hate Islam and Muslims because of how bigoted they are towards those god drat faggots.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2016 06:43 |
|
cum_dumpster posted:guess where the irony lies? I know when I want to have an adult conversation I immediately tell everyone the argument is pointless, because, "lol internet who needs that rite, there are starving kids in Africa and you want infrastructure?"
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2016 08:14 |
|
Jintor posted:aren't most refugees fleeing radical islam terrorism though No they're all obviously sleeper agents trying to take our booze and pork away from us.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 05:07 |
|
Skellybones posted:Blair Mountain, 50-100 coal miners killed by local police. And private police, and as a test of new airforce doctrine
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 13:49 |
|
LibertyCat posted:Factually incorrect, but this isn't the place for the debate. TFR would be happy to enlighten you. Except you're also incorrect. It was illegal in America between 1994 and 2004 to purchase AR-15s manufactured between those years. You could purchase earlier models, or AR-15s made without certain attachments though.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 15:14 |
|
LibertyCat posted:This is not the same as "Apparently AR-15's were illegal in the US between 1994 and 2004". It's also not the same as, "no they weren't."
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 16:03 |
|
LibertyCat posted:"Automatic Rifle" has a specific meaning - part of that meaning is it has a mode where if you hold the trigger down and it goes BANG BANG BANG. Automatic Rifles have not been used in US Civilian spree shootings in decades. Demanding bans on them is pointless as they're already heavily restricted and have vanishingly small levels of violent crime. Doesn't this sort of contradict your earlier argument that weapons bans just couldn't work in the US and that it would take a huge amount of resources in order to be barely effectual?
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 16:25 |
|
ASIC v Danny Bro posted:Guys, I just had a thought today. There have already been massive ASX losses. Down 2.1 percent today, because of a poll showing leave was ahead 5 points. The EU said they'd punish Britain if they left and the US looks like they're about to change their interest rates. I think you're probably spot-on.
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2016 07:53 |
|
On the other hand, guns aren't addictive and don't give you a chemical high that alleviates your lovely and monotonous life. It's not really a 1:1 comparison. Banning drugs didn't work, so why would banning hand grenades?
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2016 13:14 |
|
MiniSune posted:Hmmmmm. Suspect AP is some fundy party but will look in to it. Seen some of the independents work around so will look in to him as well. I dont mind a decent independent (voted for Andren back in the day) Anti-paedophile party is Derrin Hinch's party.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 04:05 |
|
Mad Katter posted:I thought that was Derry Hinch's Justice Party. Huh it is too. Sorry, my mistake. e: I don't want to see Ricky replaced by Hinch.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 04:16 |
|
McEwen 1 MITCHELL, Rob Australian Labor Party 2 ANDERSON, James The Nationals 3 BARKER, Neil The Greens 4 JERMYN, Chris Liberal 5 LEE, Ross Independent 6 ANDREW, Tracey Australian Country Party 7 TRUSCOTT, Jeff Rise Up Australia Party 8 VAINA, Cathy Animal Justice Party 9 LONG, Dorothy Lorraine Family First Party Not the worst.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 07:58 |
|
Wrageowrapper posted:Whats a Democratic Labour Party and can they get away with DLP? Mid 20th century anti-communist Labor party splitters.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 08:00 |
|
Wrageowrapper posted:Well if they are anti-communist then what is the bloody point? They like the Catholic part of the Labor party, but don't like the labour part.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 08:05 |
|
https://whatlaborreallythinks.com.au This is an anti-labor ad. lol. libs: We are literal monsters!
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 08:21 |
|
CrazyTolradi posted:
It's an American and Canadian form of Sylvester.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2016 10:38 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 19:05 |
|
gently caress Joe Hildebrand
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2016 09:00 |