|
Bloody posted:*crackle crackle* HAS JOINED THE CALL
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2016 15:26
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 22:36 |
|
|
cause they're good. if you need a conference phone and you're a small/med business you just buy a $700 polycom kit and ur done. if ur a large company you buy a huge rear end polycom kit and have them set it up cause that's peanuts to you.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 11, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
Mad Wack posted:at my job every conference room is owned by a department and assigned to the admin of that apt - this leads to you booking a room and getting a decline plus form email from the admin. there is no structure across the company for how these rooms are booked and each admin comes up with their own process so depending on what room you try to get you may just have a short im convo or you may be logging into lotus notes to submit a form to a database or even doing a transaction or two in sap. its really cool and good because every dept has way less rooms then they need so you get tribal warfare over rooms and hidden conference rooms. lmao
|
|
#
¿
Nov 12, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:Like in Silicon Valley when people got mad about how they had so many white extras in the background for the techcrunch disrupt episode when they actually shot footage from the real thing its really the best show
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:dumpster keurig
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2016 21:22
|
|
|
chmods please posted:so they claim it integrates with skype 4 biz. this is what actually happens: don't run skype 4 b and teams at the same time. they are both skype 4 b clients
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2016 04:29
|
|
|
threaded chat is retarded and its gonna take a while for them to pull it out.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2016 17:44
|
|
|
teams is way way better than skype 4 b so theres no reason to be using skype 4 b at all.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
gooby pls posted:unified messaging/single inbox is cool and good but lol at enterprise voicemail as a whole the only way to do enterprise voicemail is send a .wav or .mp3 of the VM to your email and never store it on the phone switch ever.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2016 05:44
|
|
|
not you. skype for b client is total trash. install teams.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2016 20:22
|
|
|
Bloody posted:a locally-hosted slack-like that i could deploy with no oversight from it would have a glimmer of hope but that's still prob not gonna happen go to https://teams.microsoft.com and login w/ ur 365 creds. if it works it means someone has already enabled teams so you can download the client and use it instead of skype. you can still skype with people but the client is less terrible.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2016 20:37
|
|
|
lol sucks 2 be u
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2016 20:40
|
|
|
you could install skype preview (for skype) which is a better chat client than normal skype for skype or skype for b
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
skype for b doesn't do persistent chat.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
BiohazrD posted:Yeah this is why nobody uses Box since Microsoft added onedrive for business to o365 I don't know anyone who uses box but I know a bunch of people who use one drive and lol @ the idea that a company is gonna pay for whatever box is when onedrive comes w/ their 365 account
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:hm. we don't have it enabled so i can't try it out. teams runs on top of 365 so its a requirement. time 2 replace ur old on premise stuff w/ 365, imo
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
I'm gonna move everyone 2 teams some time early next year. good bye 2 skype 4 b.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 21, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
BiohazrD posted:you also can't have groups on onedrive for business yeah you can
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 05:12
|
|
|
mishaq posted:ive worked with at least 3 vendors in the past year that all use box so when they shared folders with me it integrated with my company box account onedrive is pretty needs suiting for us so far. we share stuff w/ external people all the time.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 22, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
setting up a secure transport between you and an unknown party is literally impossible so faxing provides a workaround.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2017 02:02
|
|
|
mishaq posted:shagger nope. theres no way to securely send anything to anyone without first going through some kind of onboarding process. that's why we still use faxes. vodkat posted:faxing on the other hand is totally secure of course not but if you were following the conversation you'd understand its allowed for things like PHI under HIPAA.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2017 13:41
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:Lol if ur calls don't also feature a screaming child in the foreground.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2017 19:27
|
|
|
Phobeste posted:my company keeps putting in nice wireless presentation systems like wepresent and now Apple tvs in all the conference rooms but they've never quite figured out all the way that nobody who comes in to do a presentation can use them because they're all field sales guys for spring companies who have locked down windows laptops. so every time there's a whole song and dance about unplugging poo poo trying to find a cable. every time get one of these things: https://www.microsoft.com/accessories/en-us/products/adapters/wireless-display-adapter-2/p3q-00001 it works gr8
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2017 19:30
|
|
|
BiohazrD posted:lol we have these, they drop out when if there's a wireless keyboard/mouse too close (assuming if they connect at all which is a crapshoot) idk works fine for me. you also can use it w/ anything running windows 10 w/ a wifi
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2017 03:36
|
|
|
not anymore!!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2017 02:37
|
|
|
You Am I posted:da fuk we switched to 365 a while back. there are a lot of things I miss from notes tho.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
KoRMaK posted:In teams?? Microsoft Teams has a giphy extension? you have to enable it in the teams settings on the 365 admin portal. also you should be able to drag or paste in images if you want. I haven't had lag issues during chat in teams, but sometimes switching chats is slow.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2017 07:30
|
|
|
Mahatma Goonsay posted:we are going from webex to Zoom. it can't be worse right? zoom is worse than webex. GoToMeeting is the only one that works reliably.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
GoToMeeting is the only inter-business meeting system that i'd use these days.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
shitface posted:Do i still need both running then? only if you want to talk to people still on skype 4 b
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 04:19
|
|
|
Sniep posted:why would you want that lol have you never worked at a company?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 16:07
|
|
|
shitface posted:how is it possible to gently caress this up so badly? this surely can't be coming from the office team, the last and only team of any competence whatsoever at microsoft its kind of an afterthought cause the goal is to move everyone off of skype entirely and on to teams. the current teams/s4b integration is really only for people using teams in its current beta form. once teams is officially released I'm gonna wipe out skype 4 b so hard.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 16:09
|
|
|
Mad Wack posted:this is a good question, our controlling systems are spread over 130 legal entities and nobody has a clear picture of where money is spent or on what - as a result i use a lot of consultants and typically people have so much trouble spending money i can usually hoover up their budget at the end of the year because they are at 10-20% of forecasted spend for the year in december if you need help spending that money give me a yell
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 16:13
|
|
|
SSO for authentication is easy as hell. Its authorization that's a bitch.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 19:18
|
|
|
I only know of one standard for authorization policy but it was doa, authorization is really a pain in the rear end and I wish someone else would fix it for me so I don't have to do it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
ChickenOfTomorrow posted:socialist group moved from slack to an open source replacement. many MANY reasons for this change were provided in an FAQ. none of my comrades read the FAQ and all started bike shedding the exact same questions. capitalism is required for functional products.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 18:44
|
|
|
yep
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2017 20:32
|
|
|
mishaq posted:the only rockets currently capable of flying humans into space are soviet only because we pay them to. and we only need to pay them to because our incompetent government couldn't build working rockets once they let politicians start setting production goals. meanwhile our capitalist system has created much cheaper launch systems that will be filling the gap our failed government systems could not.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 17:20
|
|
|
the monopoly is enforced by politicians. there would have been no monopoly without the government's involvement
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 22:36 |
|
|
space launch wasn't a natural monopoly though, it was litterrally the law that only the government was allowed to launch rockets. as those restrictions let up, private space launch companies started creating their own rockets designed for competing in the market to launch stuff into space rather than emulating government rockets which were designed to meet political production goals, with space launch being a tertiary concern.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 22, 2017 18:04
|
|