|
Boomer is skipped, Otis Reddit has until 3:54
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2016 18:57 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 23:22 |
|
Otis got skipped at 3:54, The RECAPITATOR is being skipped still, so Paulocaust can pick whenever but was skipped at 5:54 and stab is up
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2016 23:48 |
|
FBS, Ginette Reno, Metapod, Technetium are all skipped, lazerwolf is up i say we switch to the 1 hour rule now and kill these last rounds off
|
# ¿ Aug 8, 2016 17:54 |
|
give me Reid Boucher Furnaceface is up
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2016 19:36 |
|
Veskit posted:I'll pick later when I'm off work I didn't realize the second was immediate. Jordan7hm posted:Lets start that thursday at 10am. That gives time to finish this round off. so tomorrow starting at 10am, what are we doing? one round of picks per day and whoever can pick whenever?
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2016 22:30 |
|
I'll take Darcy Kuemper
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2016 16:19 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Can I change my pick quickly if he still hasn't been taken? no
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2016 19:40 |
|
happy round 20, the Panthers take Brendan Gaunce
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2016 15:01 |
|
smith is real good still despite being forever years old, that's a Nice pick
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2016 15:23 |
|
i am the bird posted:I guess I just realized I'm way below the floor. Uhhhh. don't worry, there are still several very expensive players left. some of them are even still physically capable of playing hockey!
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2016 15:39 |
|
Mike Hoffman - Matt Duchene- Anthony Duclair David Perron - Martin Hanzal - Michael Frolik Philip Di Giuseppe - Mikael Backlund - Sven Andrighetto Reid Boucher - Brendan Gaunce - the super cool guy I am drafting tomorrow morning Victor Hedman - Damon Severson Hampus Lindholm - Josh Manson Jake McCabe - Alexei Marchenko James Reimer Darcy Kuemper Alain Vigneault I wish I could have gotten a better 2LW than Perron but I think he fits with Hanzal/Frolik, and ultimately I like my team a lot and think it's one of the best puck moving teams drafted
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2016 16:56 |
|
I take RW Sam Gagner
|
# ¿ Aug 13, 2016 16:06 |
|
I'll take Jiri Tlusty. he doesn't have a contract but whatever this is pretend, he's been a valuable bottom six player for a bunch of years in a row and everyone sucks
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2016 15:37 |
|
Good Soldier Svejk posted:I need a coach so I'll take Gerard Gallant because he seems competent. i would make the argument that he can feign competence, and that is better than a lot of people can do. he also seems willing to change things when shown that he is wrong, and those are 2 traits sorely lacking in a lot of head ocaches
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2016 16:21 |
|
Jordan7hm posted:I'll take Dylan Mcilrath because I'm shocked he's still available. great pick
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2016 16:41 |
|
lehner went awhile back
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2016 18:17 |
|
I take nate schmidt for my 7d
|
# ¿ Aug 15, 2016 15:02 |
|
i am tingling with anticipation to make my last pick
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 14:40 |
|
the Florida Panthers select center Peter Holland with their final draft choice. he is at the least a reliable center who can slot in on the 4th line or bump up to the 3rd and hold his weight even if a little shakily. his 5v5 points production has been solid and he is a positive at shot suppression even if it's not a big one. Mike Hoffman - Matt Duchene - Anthony Duclair David Perron - Martin Hanzal - Michael Frolik Phillip Di Giuseppe - Mikael Backlund - Sven Andrighetto Reid Boucher - Brendan Gaunce - Sam Gagner (Jiri Tlusty - Peter Holland) Victor Hedman - Damon Severson Hampus Lindholm - Josh Manson Jake McCabe - Alexei Marchenko (Nate Schmidt) James Reimer Darcy Kuemper Alain Vigneault I feel like I have great depth and if the young guys I have wouldn't be able to stay afloat, Holland and Tlusty are good players to rotate in and at least demonstrate some competence in the bottom six. All of those forwards seem good at moving the puck and good at transitioning between zones with the puck. I have two of the top 10 D-men in the league and I filled out the rest of that group with dudes who are going to be top 4 or better for the next few years. the stats on Reimer suggest that he is a good+ goalie who has spent his seasons getting crushed under the unbearable pressure of playing behind the Toronto Maple Leafs defense, and Kuemper is a reliable backup who is about to hit his peak. Doctor Vigneault will be diagnosing cases of red face and deploying these players in their most favorable situations, and my team has no worthless plugs for him to become deeply, stalkerishly infatuated with. I am under the cap floor for the moment but once Hampus signs an extension that will be fixed.\
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 15:01 |
|
T-Bone posted:he's not big enough to be picked twice sadly cut him in half down the middle so that both eXXon and Jordan can have a Logan Brown
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 15:48 |
|
stab posted:so what are we going to do for the guys who dropped out? like theres one guy who's 30 mil under the floor lmao let's all get together and communally draft him his last 10 players or whatever
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 17:23 |
|
ginette reno already took t-mac
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 17:25 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Not unhappy with a single player I have. you should be
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 18:56 |
|
jake bean is the hockiest name i've heard in a while. you managed to draft a lot of islanders
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 19:15 |
|
jake bean just got bested
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 19:17 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Who on my team is an albatross/possession black hole that I don't know about? Parise has a bad contract because of the length, but it's the only bad contract I can see, and it's not like Parise still won't be really good for several more seasons. Pirri isn't great but he had a down year and if he signs somewhere he'll come up with 15+ goals and help my powerplay. My fourth line is three guys with awesome fancies, including one of the best young shutdown forwards in the league. Cole/Postma aren't too good but they're serviceable considering they're 6th/7th D, especially Postma, who is fast and has had good fancies his entire career in limited playing time. the issue with your team is that all of your lines except the top would be constantly losing the shot differential battle and overall losing the goal differential battle as a result. you drafted a bunch of good offensive players but your top 9 is littered with dudes who are bad at shot suppression and so is your non-top pair on D. your good defensive players are basically incapable of driving offense and all stacked up on one line anyway. brian elliott is good but he's also several years past his physical prime now, and has never played all that much in a season so who knows how good he's going to be when he's getting twice as many minutes as he ever has before. i think your team is still above average and would make the playoffs in this theoretical league but i think they'd get exposed by the lack of depth and lack of defensive ability of most of your dudes and would look like shook rear end bitches e: also a lot of bad goal differentials over multiple seasons, and a lot of bad relative goal differentials, and lots of dudes who look bad via expected goals (basically a measurement of shot quality) Aye Doc fucked around with this message at 20:27 on Aug 16, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 20:21 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Ah I saw you said "every line but the top" just now. I dunno Kadri/Steen drive shot differential as far as I see. And Buchnevich looks good. they both have positive differentials but they are getting killed on the defensive end, it's just that they are players where the offensive boost is more than the defensive loss. will that stay true for steen (and parise, and bergeron) as they get into their mid 30s? what happens when you put a bunch of dudes who are bad at suppressing shots on the same line (like what your second line is)? beleskey is also bad at shot suppression, pirri is horrific at it. hamonic is also really bad at it, and he might be a little better at it when he's not seeing as many top pairs, but over the course of the season how big of a difference will that really be? cole is worthless, and pysyk has great possession numbers but his expected goal differential is majorly negative and that's cause for concern even if i'm high on him. when i say your depth is gonna get exposed, i mean obviously you have good scoring depth, but the only good defensive player in your middle six is karlsson. you are relying a lot on werenski to anchor a shallow defense, and a lot on some aging goal scorers to overcome a lot of questionable defensive players. if elliott is average over 55-60 games, your team is going to struggle because of how much other teams would outshoot you T-Bone posted:someone be a man and do power rankings (WITH goddamn blurbs) I simmed this entire loving thing last year i could (slowly) do some short fancy-stats based write-ups about the teams if people were interested in reading my dumb words
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 21:03 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:Here's basically what I think in terms of goals scored. Also, interesting about Kadri/Steen, yeah they're not good defensively but they generate a lot of shots/offense and I hope I'll be fine with that. I can just as easily put Steen with Bergeron and Simmonds and Parise with Kadri and Buchnevich to balance it out but I dunno if I'd want to, because that first line is gonna be pretty dominant. steen and kadri didn't even score 20 goals this past season getting first line icetime; why would they do it getting second line icetime? now pretend i said this for all the other players you overestimated for, too
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 21:09 |
|
Teemu Pokemon posted:Talk about how my team is 20/23 NCAA alumni and therefore smarter than every other team i will do my best to evaluate everyone's teams in context of their drafting gimmicks. for example, whatever the hell flyinglemur did is an A+
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 21:20 |
|
Brodeurs Nanny posted:You don't think Steen/Kadri are both 20-goal players? Even if I over-estimated them, if they both comine for 35 goals, that still makes my team a 240+ goal team. i'm not quoting the other posts but here are my responses to your general points: i think kadri and steen are both 20 goal players if they get 20 minutes a game, but there are 60 minutes in a game of hockey. i think beleskey is an 18 goal scorer if he gets 18 minutes a game but he's not going to on this team. i think pirri is a 15 goal scorer if he gets 15 minutes a game, but he's not going to on this team. if they do get those minutes, it's coming at the expense of your other better wingers. you keep talking about getting whatever players a majority of o-zone starts, but there are again a lot less of those in a game of hockey to spread around than you seem to realize. if you could play the entire game inside your opponent's blue line and somehow find 70 minutes of ice time in a game of hockey, you'd score 260 goals
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 21:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 23:22 |
|
stab posted:Jonathan Huberdeau - Kyle Turris - Jordan Eberle i like a lot about this team (most of it on the offensive side) and also agree it's a playoff team especially under the handsome leadership of kirk muller.
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2016 22:16 |