|
a false posted:why does it even matter in their first year post expansion. they were never going to be drafting a playoff team No it doesn't matter, I just read a few posts saying they'd be competitive or wild card and there's just no way
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:07 |
|
|
Who could they have drafted to be much better than this anyway. Of course there will be SUCK.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
I'm trusting the process baby
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:13
|
|
|
Obviously they were not going to be good, but let's not pretend this team isn't significantly worse than what it could have been.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:20
|
|
|
Mike_V posted:Obviously they were not going to be good, but let's not pretend this team isn't significantly worse than what it could have been. But they don't want to be any good. They want a few good players to excite fans and a bunch of stuff they could easily trade.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:22
|
|
|
sleep with the vicious posted:No it doesn't matter, I just read a few posts saying they'd be competitive or wild card and there's just no way if they had flipped some of their weird draft choices for better players and had a lucky season, they could have potentially been a wild card bubble team. maybe if everything went their way i could have seen like a 10% chance of them making the playoffs based on what GMGM has done in the past 24 hrs, i think it's more like a 1% chance
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
Mike_V posted:Obviously they were not going to be good, but let's not pretend this team isn't significantly worse than what it could have been. worse today, yes, but that doesn't matter. so far it's way too early to say that they could have done a better job getting futures. i still think the schlemko deal was pretty close to market value for him. the emelin pick is the only thing that really confuses me
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
i should clarify that if their goal is to tank hard emelin helps, but there's no gm in the world, even in a tanking scenario, who would purposely pick a player that they think is horrible.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
neal is an UFA after this year? that's probably going to get a good haul at the deadline. possibly even back to the preds!
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
DO YALL WANT A BOXC posted:neal is an UFA after this year? that's probably going to get a good haul at the deadline. possibly even back to the preds! vegas fans better buy those Nealer jerseys fast!
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 20:37
|
|
|
DO YALL WANT A BOXC posted:neal is an UFA after this year? that's probably going to get a good haul at the deadline. possibly even back to the preds! Can they trade a player back to the team they took him from or are there rules against that? I want him back
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
SpiritOfSanDimas posted:Can they trade a player back to the team they took him from or are there rules against that? I want him back No, they have to wait a full year. So they'd have to send him to another contender, but that shouldn't be a hard sell.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 20:38
|
|
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:No, they have to wait a full year. So they'd have to send him to another contender, but that shouldn't be a hard sell. is that true? i've never heard of it, but i've never heard of a team wanting a guy back so soon. even if he was picked in the draft?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 22:13
|
|
|
DO YALL WANT A BOXC posted:is that true? i've never heard of it, but i've never heard of a team wanting a guy back so soon. even if he was picked in the draft? That's the buyout rule I think, no idea if it applied to the expansion draft.
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 22:47
|
|
|
Thufir posted:That's the buyout rule I think, no idea if it applied to the expansion draft. does it count for trades too?
|
|
#
?
Jun 22, 2017 23:39
|
|
|
DO YALL WANT A BOXC posted:is that true? i've never heard of it, but i've never heard of a team wanting a guy back so soon. even if he was picked in the draft? For the draft the player is ineligible for the team they came from until Jan 1 2018. I'm not sure if that's just direct trades from Vegas to the team or any avenue that gets the player to the team.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2017 12:23
|
|
|
....sooooo then how much is Vancouver giving up to get Sbisa back?
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
JawKnee posted:for real. Nucks are going to finish bottom 5 again - and probably 31st, barring another Avalanche happening I have faith Benning will do something stupid in the draft today. Is there an elite #1 pick next year? Even still the Canucks will lose the lottery like they will lose most of their games.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
JawKnee posted:for real. Nucks are going to finish bottom 5 again - and probably 31st, barring another Avalanche happening i'd say there's a good chance of another avalanche happening. to the avalanche.
|
|
#
?
Jun 23, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:07 |
|
|
Duke Chin posted:....sooooo then how much is Vancouver giving up to get Sbisa back? That implies they have assets to give up That said, probably Jordan Subban and a pick
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2017 16:10
|
|