|
its good, op
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2016 06:34 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 17:59 |
|
the show and bluegrass both, i mean
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2016 06:34 |
|
coffeetable posted:i am way more willing to accept nonlocality than i am true randomness nerd bump_fn posted:theres nothing random about decoherence nerd Stereotype posted:actually locality is probably not a great assumption. It pops up in the advanced potential solution to maxwell's equations for example. nerd bump_fn posted:maxwells equations are classical and are a well posed causal cauchy problem w causal local evolution (w constraints, is that what you're concerned about? gauss' law?) but almost all of modern physics is based on local quantum field theory (i'm not going to get into quantum gravity but even there things are ``pretty'' local in something like string theory) nerd bump_fn posted:img-jerkoff motion.gif nerd coffeetable posted:local hidden variables are nerd PleasingFungus posted:yeah, most people don't realize that was trying to make that point. but... nerd bump_fn posted:this is wrong since hidden variables are in disagreement w bells inequality fwiw nerd
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2016 01:40 |