|
It's pretty strange to have the biggest party be a minority party in a coalition...
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2018 10:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 15:35 |
|
|
But does anyone really buy supporting a regering supported by SD isn't cooperating with SD? Just the statsministeromröstning will make it obvious won't it?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2018 20:35
|
|
|
That's not how marginal taxes work, but I do know that Denmark is a huge cluster gently caress with taxes. Aren't they making another new revenue service?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2018 07:04
|
|
|
Rust Martialis posted:I made more after tax in Canada than in Denmark, even after getting 33% more in salary in DK. I know full well how marginal tax rates work, thanks. DK just has a much higher top bracket rate. Plus cost-of-living in DK is higher across the board, plus MOMS. Didn't get that the income post tax was in different countries, that makes more sense 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2018 10:36
|
|
|
Also it would be a pretty huge gently caress you to a Riksdag who just voted Lövfen out to nominate him. They just voted that they didn't want him, so it makes the most sense to let some other people fail before giving him the chance.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2018 13:07
|
|
|
So, Uffe is not going to be statsminister. What's next, Löfven? I guess L or C could deal with him if Uffes brinkmanship pisses them of, but I doubt it. 4 more years like the ones we just had with DÖ-2? Since no one is going to cave it's either that or nyval, both of which is going to make Alliansen pretty foolish. Holy poo poo is S going to hammer ansvar
|
|
#
¿
Oct 9, 2018 22:54
|
|
|
It's pretty funny that he thinks he can do a Reinfeldt, wasn't that SDs first term in the Riksdag? Also alliansen was still the largest block. To be honest I don't understand why they deposed Löfven if they're not going to actively collaborate with SD. And I really don't think SD is going to settle for anything less than actual influence.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2018 13:07
|
|
|
But like how are they supposed to rule without the support of SD, they ate going to need them for every single vote. I really don't think this is what's meant when you call something a minoritetsregering
|
|
#
¿
Oct 12, 2018 20:59
|
|
|
Can someone make one of those douche guy memes were it says: deposes you as statsminister, asks for you to support him for statsminister
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2018 17:22
|
|
|
When I saw how the blue/brown block reacted on the election night it felt pretty sure that they were going to try for just ignoring reality and going with: it's our turn to rule now! Luckily that didn't work. But they don't keep insisting that is Steffe who should roll over and support them when the only logical thing I can see is either one of L and C replacing MP or just pure S. Edit: MP must realise that it was a huge mistake to join the cabinet. And 4 years ago Steffe called Alliansens bluff giving us DÖ. They have to either embrace SD and rule with them or let S rule without "accidentally voting with SD" all the time and completely block the government from doing anything. He told them to stop or it's nyval and they did... zokie fucked around with this message at 22:31 on Oct 19, 2018 |
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2018 22:26
|
|
|
Does Steffe need any yes votes from Alliansen or are abstentions enough? Because now I'm starting to believe that C & L are hard no on SD. Then again maybe Steffe can ruin another party buy having it as a minority member of his regering. Otherwise my guess is nyval, but last time we got DÖ instead...
|
|
#
¿
Nov 28, 2018 21:15
|
|
|
Does MP not understand how bad it was for them to be in regeringen? They couldn't even stop the sale of Vattenfalls coal plants. And I don't think I can name a single thing that they accomplished in the last 4 years.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 30, 2018 11:47
|
|
|
I think Steffe is just trying to show how reasonable and responsible he is being and making sure that the narrative is Lööf saying no and killing any deal. I also think that is why L is reluctant to say that they also are out.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2018 20:26
|
|
|
So Janne & Annie are OK with politics that are dependent on SD but not a statsminister/regering? Can Steffe refuse to get voted on? Because he should, obviously C&L have changed their minds. And letting them vote no to him again only gives them cover to say: "Well, we have to have a statsminister"
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2018 17:18
|
|
|
Looking forward to seeing Alliansen coming up with a coherent regeringsförslag.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 19, 2018 11:49
|
|
|
Dirk Pitt posted:C seeing that poll has to have them concerned about nyval. I expect them to about face and cozy up to Uffe and SD. Or rather start acting reasonable, Annie is not going to be statsminister no matter how much she wants it. She needs to realise that she became a media darling because they needed a face for Alliansen when they went after Batra-bot
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2018 08:35
|
|
|
Looking at what their voters want Janne should cave first, but he promised his kid(s?) not to and as a fellow dad I'm going to have to hope he keeps that promise. The choice they have is to either join Uffe, which I don't think is very likely, or abstain like with the budget and then keep on abstaining. But that's completely abdicating posts as riksdagsmän, and should lead to an absolute slaughter in 4 years.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 20, 2018 09:06
|
|
|
Accenture is going to get another contract like when they scammed the UK for millions of £ and only delivered a handful of soldiers, or when they scammed the USA for millions of $ for 3 dozen border agents.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2019 15:33
|
|
|
von Braun posted:Platsbanken and the sorts are also filled with rekryteringsfirmor which I despise. The last interview I had with them the interviewer told me I should wear a suit to look more ”interested” in the job or whatever. A dresscode was not included in the ad. But was it an office job?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2019 11:18
|
|
|
MiddleOne posted:You don't wear suits to the office in Sweden in most professions. Yeah, but it's not that uncommon to interview for a job in an office wearing one. And I'm just thinking maybe, if someone suggests something to help you get a job they are doing it to help. Not to gently caress you over.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2019 19:04
|
|
|
I'm an IT consultant, but don't wear a suit myself. But it's still quite common at clients I interact with, especially once you get into middle management positions or more senior positions (or persons). I'm not trying to say that you must wear one when interviewing, but if it's for a white collar job it won't hurt. My main point is just that the jobs counsellor was probably just trying to help.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2019 20:03
|
|
|
Or you could just be nice and communicative and tell them you don't have one, and either that will be just fine or that you should try to work something out. You'll never look out of place wearing a suit in a white collar environment, and suggesting a job applicant wear one isn't out of place either. Piling scorn someone trying to help you is out of place and so is calling someone a loving weirdo for pointing that out.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
You are missing the obvious, once someone old has a fall and a major fracture their life expectancy plummets. M just like other conservatives are a death cult
|
|
#
¿
Feb 7, 2019 12:17
|
|
|
IT is really fuckin bad, and from reading the article I think this happened because the people making the call centre software didn't think that the calls could contain sensitive information. And then they went ahead and sold it to someone handling sensitive information. I've pointed out extreme security breaches to clients who have shrugged their shoulders. In some cases they know and want it to be that way, because the lack of security allows them to do something easy and convenient. Luckily it's never been putting people in risk, only themselves
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2019 21:05
|
|
|
Subcontractor of a subcontractor
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
I don't know about that, but what it did is introduce actual consequences which the directive PuL came from did not.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2019 12:58
|
|
|
Retarded Goatee posted:Don't forget to swisha your local hamnarbetare - it's good, folks. They won! I'm so loving happy right now!!!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2019 20:04
|
|
|
He was arrested because Ecuador decided to kick him out. Once that happened he was going to get arrested for something, not just ride away into the sunset.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
Rutkowski posted:You don't. The vote for that isn't until tbe 18th of June
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2019 20:42
|
|
|
I think the main problem is people not understanding what the Landsting does. And not voting V of course...
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2019 06:48
|
|
|
McCloud posted:So uh....what the hell, Denmark? Reminds me of a book I read based on the diaries of a german soldier on the ostfront, he encounters a SS soldier from the sonderkommando. And over cigarettes the SS-man tells him about how they had ~1500 Jews and other dig a giant trench for several days. Then told them to line up, a couple hundred at the time by the edge. When mowed down with a machine gun, they fall down into the trench. The next batch called up have to climb down and re-arrange the bodies for space before climbing up for their turn on the edge. In closing the SS-man tells him that it's good to mix in children in each batch, to fill up tricky spaces. When someone goes: But, Stalin! I tell them this story zokie fucked around with this message at 17:11 on Aug 4, 2019 |
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2019 16:36
|
|
|
There is also the cost of purchasing something as an organization to consider. An expense report needs to be made, that has to get approved &c. And the time to do this costs money. If something needs to be payed by invoice it might be a new supplier and that needs to be registered. Don't underestimate the cost, complexities, and inefficiencies of corporate bureaucracy!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2019 12:27
|
|
|
Basically Janne Josefsson is a huge gubbslem and a gamersgater
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2019 18:29
|
|
|
And then there was the time he ambushed Peter Sunde with the father of the murdered children in the case where the prosecutor/court didn't censor/classify the pictures of dead children from the FÖP. Someone uploaded it to TPB and it wouldn't have been a thing outside of Flashback if the news hadn't made a huge thing of it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 22, 2019 19:15
|
|
|
Katt posted:Emil i Lönneberga.  Astrid Lindgren paints a pretty (dreadful) image of how poor pensioners where treated.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2019 18:02
|
|
|
I don't watch TV anymore but if UG is doing TERF stuff then I'm not suprised. Because if you add righteous concern trolling with bigotry, transphobia is what you end up with.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2019 11:10
|
|
|
I guess I wasn't thinking, to me TERFism had become synonymous with transphobia. Specifically the "think of the children/lesbians'"-concern trolling. Other bigots tend to be more blatant in my experience
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
It really sucks that genocide is back, not that it really left but still
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2020 12:57
|
|
|
I LOLed when the news had this quotequote:Barn smittar inte
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2020 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 15:35 |
|
|
Bard has no ability for empathy, he’s a cold blooded lizard. It’s been his thing forever, but he usually avoids being completely tonedeaf. I will always cherish how he in a debate panel during Pride with EBT responded to her argument: “we don’t hate homosexuality, but why do they have to be so flamboyant hand have parades and stuff??” with standing up and started screaming: gently caress YOU! gently caress YOU! Which ironically is my response to his recent embarrassment of a tweet
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2020 07:55
|
|