|
 Automotive Instincts by Rohan Bassett, on Flickr I don't know why you're giving me that look mate, you're the one walking into my loving photo which part of deadpan urban landscape says "hi-vis vest" to you
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2016 12:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 04:26 |
|
|
Spedman posted:I recently saw a show where 8x10 negs were wet printed to that kind of size, and if you got close you could start to easily see the grain etc. Check it out if not, great work.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 30, 2016 00:26
|
|
|
 Bigfoot by Rohan Bassett, on Flickr
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 02:07
|
|
|
What could I possibly do with my last roll of Astia, besides taking it back to Japan for a proper send-off? Shimokitazawa by Rohan Bassett, on Flickr  Shopfront by Rohan Bassett, on Flickr Scanning these last shots made me realise just how good a film it was, the Provia shots I'm working through are nowhere near as nice. Why must Fuji make terrible decisions  oh well, at least we can still buy three loving versions of velvia in every format
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2018 09:43
|
|
|
I have two, and recommend them. The only advantage Mod54 has is that it can load 6 sheets as opposed to 4, but I never loaded the full six sheets anyway so it was a moot point. I also noticed my Mod54 would sometimes leave marks from the plastic fingers, while the SP-445 doesn’t have any plastic touching the emulsion at all.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 4, 2019 09:37
|
|
|
Google Butt posted:Gotcha, in that case LF is probably out of the equation until I get my Sony a7ii and lenses at least. Is MF marginally cheaper or significantly so? Again, it’s a false economy if you’re after the LF experience, though. Shooting LF is different to other formats even before you develop the negatives. [edit: I also think it’s a false economy to get a camera you’ll never take into the field with you, monorails seem like a PITA to me though I know other people here have used them and might have better insight...
|
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2019 03:54
|
|
|
MrBlandAverage posted:I disagree, rollfilm backs can be good. I'm always going to shoot 4x5 if it makes sense, but there's some cases where I want movements and also don't need 4x5. The main practical issue is that a 135mm lens is normal-wide on 4x5 but pretty tight on even 6x7, so you're either getting a much shorter lens (I have a 65mm that just barely covers 4x5 and is used rarely for that purpose but more often gets used when I'm using my rollfilm back) or taking an entirely different kind of photo.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 24, 2019 03:13
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 04:26 |
|
|
Wild EEPROM posted:Large format weighs less than medium format
|
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2019 11:35
|
|