|
I carry my poo poo in a bag and I have a job that gives me enough money to buy film at the end of the day.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2016 16:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 23:45 |
|
MrBlandAverage posted:I never take my camera out of the bag without being reasonably sure of how I'm going to compose the photo. And even once it's out, you have a 4x5" glass plate that's showing the image you're going to take. At that point you've got to put the holder in the camera, stop down the lens, cock the shutter, remove the dark slide, and fire. There's a lot of time to think hard about the shot you're taking before you do it.
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2016 18:35 |
|
Here is a large format:
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2016 02:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 17, 2016 23:44 |
|
Mt. Hood spotted
|
# ¿ Jul 18, 2016 20:51 |
|
God Bless This Chamonix
|
# ¿ Jul 19, 2016 05:06 |
|
Billings, Montana
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 03:55 |
|
I don't understand why people would want to share their LF work on Instagram. Such a big format presented on such a tiny network.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 15:32 |
|
Awkward Davies posted:I think the network is huge though. You gotta go where the people are, to some extent. It does seem somewhat silly, but also you can still see the LF difference in the photos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKiIroiCvZ0
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 17:06 |
|
Awkward Davies posted:I dunno. I think snobbery is available to people who are already successful. Lynch can rail against iPhones all he wants, he doesn't have to worry about people not watching his stuff. He can afford to tell them that they're consuming his work "wrong". You're implying that the goal of all (most?) photographers is purely for exposure. I don't think you need to be successful to want to retain some modicum of control over how your images are presented. There's nothing inherently wrong with sharing your images on whatever platform you want, but I personally feel like you're losing out on some of the benefits of presentation of LF (or even any non-phone image, really) when displaying them on a medium that's going to only be viewed on a small screen. If your entire goal is exposure or convincing people to follow in your footsteps, sure, whatever, use Instagram. I use it as a mobile phone sketchbook but obviously I don't represent the views of the entire userbase.
|
# ¿ Jul 20, 2016 21:30 |
|
bellows lugosi fucked around with this message at 01:12 on Jul 21, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 21, 2016 00:45 |
|
Who?
|
# ¿ Jul 21, 2016 06:38 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 22, 2016 00:55 |
|
Helicity posted:That's my new favorite shot of yours. - those clouds are majestic as gently caress. Thanks!
|
# ¿ Jul 23, 2016 21:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 24, 2016 17:18 |
|
Good neon, shame it'll obviously never turn on again
|
# ¿ Jul 25, 2016 01:16 |
|
Bar 3/3 (of bars I'm posting on this page of the thread) in Conrad, MT
|
# ¿ Jul 26, 2016 03:25 |
|
Awkward Davies posted:A person!!!!!111!!1!1!!!!112!!!! 3 sisters & their mother
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 00:40 |
|
Happens to me all the time
|
# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 05:29 |
|
Building or art?
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2016 16:07 |
|
somewhere outside of nowhere, Idaho
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2016 05:12 |
|
Awkward Davies posted:Just a tiny bit. I played around with it a little: The hell are you talking about
|
# ¿ Jul 29, 2016 17:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 02:25 |
|
bellows lugosi fucked around with this message at 20:47 on Jul 30, 2016 |
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 18:17 |
|
Whoops, I meant to pair them initially but jumped the gun I guess
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 20:47 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2016 04:08 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 2, 2016 01:12 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2016 00:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 00:32 |
|
A Saucy Bratwurst posted:I mean you could just say what you are trying too like El Garbo and not be an rear end in a top hat? It's not difficult. He wasn't being an rear end in a top hat.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 16:20 |
|
He's not being an rear end in a top hat, you're just a baby.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 16:32 |
|
Chill out, dude, you throw a hissy fit every time you post. If you think going MF/LF will solve your issues with wide angles you're going down the wrong path. 10mm on crop isn't good enough? Not a single MF or LF lens will let you get that wide. edit: I checked. There's a 47mm Schneider that barely covers 4x5, which is roughly equivalent to a 12mm lens on 35. bellows lugosi fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Aug 4, 2016 |
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 16:38 |
|
Pinhole + hat shutter
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 16:52 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2016 00:55 |
|
I love the little grill on the left.
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2016 17:07 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2016 02:02 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 6, 2016 18:18 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2016 22:36 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 10, 2016 03:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 23:45 |
|
|
# ¿ Aug 11, 2016 05:35 |