|
I'm not a fan of institutional misogyny, but I'm glad that the completely shaved look never made its way to men. A guy with shaved junk just looks disturbing. It's like "whoa look at the balls on that 10 year old!" I tried it once on a whim like 20 years ago, and it's itchy as gently caress. Edit: also nothing looks better than a guy with a thick, healthy wad of pubes.
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 19:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 18:22 |
|
|
loquacius posted:I dunno about anyone else but I have enough hair on my chest, stomach, and legs that if I shaved my crotch it would look completely loving absurd I've seen it a lot and it does look absurd, like just their donger is going through chemo. I've also seen guys who shave their chests, stomachs and crotches, but then forget the big patch of hair right above their rear end. It's like when guys shave their heads but forget about the back of their necks.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
Guys should just be hairy disasters, drat it. I'm with guys because I love men, why would I want them to look like ladies?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 20:15
|
|
|
Yeah but the others are wrong.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
Thank you kitty.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
FrankeeFrankFrank posted:When I was in junior high all the junior high chicks who were into loving wanted to gently caress me and really loved my "treasure trail", (their words not mine)... I guess it was the hair that created a path from my belly button to my dick. I thought it was weird, but they kept pulling my pants down to see it and I kept letting them. That just means their dads had treasure trails, too.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2016 20:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 18:22 |
|
|
Dreddout posted:I don't care either way. I will gently caress any consensual holes regardless of quantity of hair, or lack thereof. I wouldn't turn a hairless guy away, but if you're capable of having a hole that looks like Santa's mouth, why wouldn't you?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 19, 2016 00:50
|
|