|
mods please change my name to Dick Halloran tia
|
# ? Aug 6, 2016 22:41 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 11:37 |
|
Money Bags posted:This but really good. Ok you've changed my mind, I'll watch it
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 00:31 |
|
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 01:20 |
|
Holy poo poo I thought my monitors camera turned on for a second or turned into Mirror Mode or something!
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 01:45 |
|
cool cat kubrick
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 01:57 |
|
Don Tacorleone posted:Barry Lyndon sounds like a faggy movie with powdered wigs and poo poo lmao
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 08:00 |
|
Loved Barry Lyndon! So many gorgeous shots and sets. The story was interesting and engaging as well. My wife loves books that take place in that time period, so she was entranced. I would definitely echo the recommendations given here! The candlelight scenes were pretty amazing.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 13:44 |
|
Watching Spartacus for the first time, it's on Shomi The Shining later this week, my girlfriend has never watched it Edit: This intro is long as gently caress but good as poo poo! A+ Professor Shark fucked around with this message at 14:01 on Aug 7, 2016 |
# ? Aug 7, 2016 13:59 |
|
Professor Shark posted:Holy poo poo I thought my monitors camera turned on for a second or turned into Mirror Mode or something! Nice to meet you Mr. Kubrick
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 14:23 |
|
Also, I remember a goon telling a story about how she used to nude model for Christina Kubrick at their house and how Stanley walked by one time and saw her naked
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 14:24 |
|
drat, while reading about Spartacus I read that the director that did the first season of True Detective is making Kubrick's Napoleon
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 15:17 |
|
Kubrick's pre-movie photography is awesome
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 16:04 |
|
Egbert Souse posted:Kubrick's pre-movie photography is awesome How did het get into my apartment
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 16:08 |
|
Most of the way through Spartacus right now- those fire logs look like they'd be very dangerous to do
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 17:45 |
|
The guy who played the writer in clockwork orange thought that Kubrick was a bad director because there wasn't free Guinness available on set
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 17:47 |
|
fun fact the guy who played the writer was the chevalier in barry lyndon and the priest was barry's uncle and alex's dad was grady in the shining
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:04 |
|
The guy who played Grady was in Barry Lyndon too
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:05 |
|
Ein cooler Typ posted:fun fact The kid who was lord bullington became his friend and assistant for the rest of his films i think
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:07 |
|
The guy that played Turgidson in strangelove didn't like Stanley's direction until he played a game of chess and got totally wrecked
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:46 |
|
The guy that played Turdingson in Dr Strangelove thought he was playing it too over the top and Kubrick said just go over the top for practice and we won't use those takes and Kubrick trolled him and used those takes anyway
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:48 |
|
darkhand posted:The guy that played Turgidson in strangelove didn't like Stanley's direction until he played a game of chess and got totally wrecked George C Scott didn't like a lot of people. Also Slim Pickens didn't know it was a comedy.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:50 |
|
George C. Scott is hilarious in Dr. Strangelove. He was pissed off at Kubrick for using takes where he was more exaggerated instead of more natural. His face when the President is telling the Russian Premier to shoot down the plane is perfect. (efb )
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 18:55 |
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:The guy who played the writer in clockwork orange thought that Kubrick was a bad director because there wasn't free Guinness available on set I learned from the Late Show this week that there is a law in France that says you have to provide a bottle of wine on every single catering table for your movie. So maybe he was right.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 19:18 |
|
Ein cooler Typ posted:The guy that played Turdingson in Dr Strangelove thought he was playing it too over the top and Kubrick said just go over the top for practice and we won't use those takes and Kubrick trolled him and used those takes anyway This is hilarious. Barry Lyndon is unlike any other movie I've seen. It has its misses, I suppose, but it's still a great movie.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 20:46 |
|
i'm glad for this thread because it introduced me to barry lyndon it makes me wonder how long kubrick took to find such excellent spots in nature for the filming. gotta respect his love of detail
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 20:59 |
|
From what I read today he got a lot of the scouting stuff while planning for Napoleon
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 21:01 |
|
Kubrick spent years after making 2001: A Space Odyssey researching and preparing for the Napoleon film. Then the Italian-French-Russian co-production Waterloo was a bomb. So, Kubrick decided to adapt A Clockwork Orange instead when no one wanted to back it. A Clockwork Orange only cost $2 million (2001 cost $10 million in 1968 money), shot within 6 months, almost entirely shot on location with basic light kits or practical lighting, and was released only 10 months after shooting was completed.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2016 21:21 |
|
Munsun posted:i'm glad for this thread because it introduced me to barry lyndon This one post made all my poo poo-quality Barry Lyndon propaganda worthwhile. I will also agree that it is not a perfect movie and that is okay. Paths of Glory is, however, a perfect movie. Teriyaki Hairpiece fucked around with this message at 10:49 on Aug 8, 2016 |
# ? Aug 8, 2016 10:47 |
|
Ordered Barry Lyndon on blu-ray. Looking forward to seeing it.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 12:45 |
|
Professor Shark posted:Most of the way through Spartacus right now- those fire logs look like they'd be very dangerous to do tony curtis eyes so blue
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 12:50 |
|
Makes me happy to see so many people are gonna see Barry Lyndon for the first time.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 12:50 |
|
Well, literally just this minute finished Barry Lyndon. Whilst not my favourite Kubrick film, it left me wanting more and it's cinematography is just something else. Astonishingly pretty film from start to finish, acting was incredible, the plot was solid and the characters memorable. But yeah, that cinematography... If anything the film mirrors the renaissance art that features so heavily in many of the scene's backgrounds; a hugely rich and breathtakingly beautiful film.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 15:41 |
|
2001 still has the best and coolest effects of all time
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 16:06 |
|
rear end cobra posted:2001 still has the best and coolest effects of all time Kubrick got his one and only oscar for them, I think he shared it with Doug Trumbull
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 16:10 |
|
rear end cobra posted:2001 still has the best and coolest effects of all time You can take any frame from that movie and hang it on a wall. It looks so loving good.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 16:35 |
|
drguildo posted:Not really. Words are always chosen, it's just a question of why. Goofs by definition are unintentional. Nah. I'm telling you a 'professional' poet is sitting there thinking about all the imagery and symbolism (among other things) called to mind by one word versus another and they think about it way harder that someone just writing a news article is thinking about their word choice. Of course words are always chosen but again dude lol these people are considered geniuses in their craft for a reason and it's not because they happened to make a series of goofs more coincidental than anyone else.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 16:36 |
|
Sp1r0_Agn3W posted:the famous example of this is the newer jewish criticism of shylock in the merchant of venice. i can say with some serious certainty that shakespeare did not give one poo poo about jewish causes. i dont put a lot of stock in death of the author but thats a solid example of it Okay but no one can even say with serious certainty Shakespeare was a real person and not a conglomerate of a few different authors so that's kind of a special case imo. Sp1r0_Agn3W posted:this doesnt have much to do with kubrick but as an english degree haver (lol) i can say with certainty that most words in novels or other long-form works are not that specific. Sure, long form isn't that specific but again dude kinda lol if you think authors aren't doing a few drafts of their work and changing details all the time. It's not like they just poo poo something out and go 'looks good' and coincidentally it happens to be an amazing literary work. Sitting there going 'Kubrick is lauded for his technical genius and the way it affects the narrative/content of the work, I bet it was all just coincidence haha' is kinda silly that's all I'm saying. Dude had people using tape measures on the streets of NYC; I'm pretty sure he was aware of the camera angles when filming. Obv he's only human and I'm sure there are some unintentional goofs but the root of this conversation was the inner geometry of the Overlook not making sense and I'm pretty sure that was intentional. Moridin920 fucked around with this message at 16:42 on Aug 8, 2016 |
# ? Aug 8, 2016 16:38 |
|
Jose Oquendo posted:You can take any frame from that movie and hang it on a wall. You can do that with any movie
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 17:03 |
|
friendly reminder that the author has been dead since 1967 in piss.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 17:10 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 11:37 |
|
rear end cobra posted:2001 still has the best and coolest effects of all time Part of why it looks so good is because everything was done in camera. Instead of optical printers that cause a generation loss. It's actually common for traditional animation, but hugely tome consuming for live action. This means some shots had to go through the camera a dozen times. Imagine loving up one.
|
# ? Aug 8, 2016 18:57 |