Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Pierson
Oct 31, 2004



College Slice
Isn't the biggest problem with RT is that it only takes into account whether a film was above or below that magical 59%? A film could be extremely mediocre but if eighty out of one hundred critics gave it 61% it would be considered 80% fresh?

Also the fact that movie sites seem to do the thing game magazines were notorious for where 7 is considered average and anything below that is bad. I remember EDGE magazine used a 'true' 1-10 scale where 5 was the average and 7 would be considered 'good' and people poo poo on it all the time because fans of things don't like seeing those things get low scores. Add in the fact that superhero movies are incredibly tribal and yeah I'm not surprised it was Suicide Squad that was the final straw in this argument.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread