|
Vox Nihili posted:This could maybe happen if Hillary died 5 days before the election I guess. Kaine would probably be elected anyway, as ballots would all still say Clinton.
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 08:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 11:28 |
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:This could maybe happen if Hillary died 5 days before the election I guess. The yoogest, most luxurious election.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 08:31
|
|
|
This is my map. There are many like it, but this one is mine. (Inspired by the recent poll showing Trump up only 3 points in Missouri. Gave him Iowa because it's a coinflip anyway and my map needs to be unique.)
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 19:34
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:This is my map. There are many like it, but this one is mine. Lol at Missouri going blue before Iowa
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 20:10
|
|
|
Latest poll shows Iowa C+3, Missouri T+3.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 20:26
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:This could maybe happen if Hillary died 5 days before the election I guess. That would still mean Kaine v Trump
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 20:58
|
|
|
Ego-bot posted:Latest poll shows Iowa C+3, Missouri T+3. That's right, though the average of recent Iowa polls shows just a very slight Clinton lead, and we only have a single poll to go on for Missouri.
|
|
#
?
Aug 17, 2016 21:08
|
|
|
Discendo Vox posted:That would still mean Kaine v Trump Clinton dying and leaving the Presidency to Tim Kaine means that if nothing else Virginia is blue as gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
 Clinton will win the popular vote by about ~10 points or so. Texas, Indiana, and Montana will all be close Trump wins.
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2016 06:56
|
|
|
 Boring, conventional close election map. Not the best-case scenario for Trump (without big changes to the fundamentals of the race) but probably close. Fat Lowtax has issued a correction as of 07:46 on Aug 18, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2016 07:42
|
|
538
|
I haven't updated in a while due to life stuff. Will get to it tonight.
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
Hold on to your butts
|
|
#
?
Aug 18, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
Feral_Shofixti posted:Dafuq is wrong with you guys I would like to add that this is only valid if Hillary does not cheat.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
How many faithless electors do you think we'd have if we really had a 269-269 tie based on the states' votes?
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
 170 to win.
|
|
#
?
Aug 19, 2016 08:09
|
|
|
clintonloss.jpg
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 22:07
|
|
|
This election is not a joke and you should not be making light of it. It's a tough and emotional thing for a country to go through, speaking from personal experience, and I know that it's often much harder on the electorate than on the candidates.
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clintonloss.jpg lmao
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
E: n/m
|
|
#
?
Aug 22, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clintonloss.jpg holy poo poo
|
|
#
?
Aug 23, 2016 05:50
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clintonloss.jpg nice 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 03:59
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clintonloss.jpg 
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 04:01
|
|
|
Is Jaguar Johnson winning Nebraska 3rd district?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 04:06
|
|
|
Ego-bot posted:Is Jaguar Johnson winning Nebraska 3rd district? This is Something Awful, and you're surprised someone put a big floppy Johnson in the middle of their map?
|
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:clintonloss.jpg This is how the world ends Not with a bang but this map
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
EngineerSean posted:How many faithless electors do you think we'd have if we really had a 269-269 tie based on the states' votes? Two, but they're in different parties and they cancel each other's vote out. chaos_reigns_fox.jpg
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
Realistic Road to the Thousand Year Trumpenreich.
|
|
#
?
Sep 5, 2016 01:43
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 13:48
|
|
|
 It's initially a tie but Hillary wins a recount in Nevada.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 18:55
|
|
|
Fun electoral map history thing: Alf Landon is infamous for getting absolutely spanked by FDR in the 1936 election, getting a whopping 8 votes in the college (Maine and Vermont). The election is also fun because, as today, polling was a disaster and the primaries and third parties were a total mess. It's worth taking a look at, since it seems the SA elects thread has sadly died. But here's the fun part: while researching another project, I found that Landon gave a five-minute speech outlining his personal beliefs on Edward R. Murrow's This I believe program in the 1950s. Give it a listen. The guy actually seems pretty cool for being the greatest loser in US presidential history.
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 21:38
|
|
|
im here from the future to warn you all~
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:15
|
|
|
Vox Nihili posted:im here from the future to warn you all~ thats not my actual guess btw~
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:07
|
|
|
Gray is 3rd party CHAOS REIGNS 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 03:30
|
|
|
e: This is more like it. Texas dangles in the right place and there's a faithless elector in Colorado for that little extra something. 
HBar has issued a correction as of 23:58 on Sep 9, 2016 |
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 04:13
|
|
|
I can make maps that no-one gets too!
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2016 06:23
|
|
|
Here's mine: The theory behind this map is that Trump's support with non-college educated white voters pushes him over the edge in the second district in Maine and the whole of Iowa. It's a close race in Ohio and North Carolina, but Hillary wins by less than a point in each. Increased Hispanic turnout, along with a shift to the Democrats relative to 2012, is decisive in Nevada, North Carolina, and Florida. Georgia, Arizona, and Texas are surprisingly close, though not seriously in play by election day. The biggest surprise will be that Hillary performs better among white college-educated voters than Donald Trump, which hasn't happened since polling began to give us that information in 1952. The vote will be very close in Nevada, Iowa, Ohio, Florida, and North Carolina, which will keep the election from being called until late in the evening, but will ultimately prove to be a decisive win in the electoral college. There'll be a lot of grousing on right-leaning media about recounts in critical states, but by the end of the night, even if there are recounts in a couple states, it won't have a material effect on the outcome and will only be a question of the margin of Hillary's victory in the electoral college.
|
|
#
?
Sep 11, 2016 05:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 00:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 11:28 |
|
|
 I'm 
|
|
#
?
Sep 13, 2016 00:35
|
|