|
a hole-y ghost posted:My butt doesn't have poop on it actually, thanks to your toothbrush. Which one 
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 08:00 |
|
|
I used to only wear Joe boxer brand knit boxers. You can only find tem in k-mart now (which is fun because where the gently caress is there even a k-mart anymore?), but that was when I was a fatty. I'm in good shape now and I enjoy wearing the nut hugging spandex stuff.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
12 pairs of black Kirkland boxer briefs because who gives a poo poo. I'll wear the Lycra stuff if I'm camping or any situation that would make me swampy
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
I buy the variety packs of Fruit of The Loom boxer briefs. 50% of them are some muted form or blue or grey. Occasionally it's some fruity color like teal or red.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 01:44
|
|
|
Seems everyone is set on the boxer brief or standard boxers. Anyone rocking briefs or "men's" bikinis and thongs? How about lady goons how is panty technology these days?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:05
|
|
|
Andrew Christian Almost Naked. That's not a description it's just what they're called. Man these are great. It's like having your junk gently pampered all day by a servant made out of clouds and respectful fondness. I don't think straight boys can wear them, though? I mean you can try, but it's something that's never been attempted. Here there be dragons.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
Boyshorts are pretty good. I have a few pairs that feel like the same material as a comfy hoodie. Highly recommended. Also if you have a good rear end they fit it really well, and it feels cool. I think that's about all I have to say about my probably weird underwear recommendations. hth
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
I'm gonna get some silk underwear
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
I googled boyshorts and apparently this is for girls? Misleading name tbh
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:18
|
|
|
Under Armor Boxerjock for work , regular rear end boxers to sleep.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:22
|
|
|
shoophobo posted:I googled boyshorts and apparently this is for girls?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
my dick keeps tearing holes in my underwear. very frustrating. need some kevlar down there.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
a hole-y ghost posted:really? thats messed up.. I wear girlshorts
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:32
|
|
|
shoophobo posted:I googled boyshorts and apparently this is for girls? hosed up world we live in
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:44
|
|
|
Hrist posted:Boyshorts are pretty good. I have a few pairs that feel like the same material as a comfy hoodie. Highly recommended. Also if you have a good rear end they fit it really well, and it feels cool. I think that's about all I have to say about my probably weird underwear recommendations. hth I liked when my ex-wife wore them. They were cute. (no I don't like children). They seemed more practical than regular women's underwear. I'd highly recommend getting something with a technical material. Helps keep the guys' bits and pieces in place as well as wicking, so I could only imagine women benefiting from them as well. Especially if you are active. I have opinions on underwear. edit: I guess boy shorts have changed in the past few years. They look pretty sweet now. They used to be like.... briefs type things. When I GIS'd it, it was different but there were a couple of what I was thinking of. Pennywise the Frown fucked around with this message at 02:49 on Aug 7, 2016 |
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:46
|
|
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:I'm gonna get some silk underwear Please don't. They're super-comfy until they bind and pinch your relaxed scrotum - silk has no give. If you're a lady, go to town though.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
Do It Once Right posted:Please don't. They're super-comfy until they bind and pinch your relaxed scrotum - silk has no give. If you're a lady, go to town though. Dang 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:48
|
|
|
Pennywise the Frown posted:I have opinions on underwear. It's cool to have opinions on undies. More people should, really. I have no idea what the old style ones you might be thinking of are, but yeah, they're pretty great in every way.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Hector Beerlioz posted:I'm gonna get some silk underwear https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVraKeDbyzQ
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:50
|
|
|
Oh man i don't want jcvd calling me a human being 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:51
|
|
|
Hrist posted:It's cool to have opinions on undies. More people should, really. Basically this. The old school underwear boys used to wear. Tighty whiteys but...... tighty..ier. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:52
|
|
|
Pennywise the Frown posted:Basically this. The old school underwear boys used to wear. Tighty whiteys but...... tighty..ier. Why does it have a fly??
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
depends!
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
Don't question it. btw, who the gently caress ever used that thing? It's FAR easier to just pull it down and do your business. Wearing a snowsuit or something?
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:54
|
|
|
Pennywise the Frown posted:Basically this. The old school underwear boys used to wear. Tighty whiteys but...... tighty..ier. Oh, those are also just called briefs. Or women's briefs, I guess.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
a kirkland man!!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
shoophobo posted:Why does it have a fly??
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:55
|
|
|
Hrist posted:Oh, those are also just called briefs. Or women's briefs, I guess. I've been out of the game for a while. Boy shorts sounds weird and doesn't make sense...... because boys never wear (not judging) that type of underwear. I just figured the one I posted was still considered that. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:56
|
|
|
I almost never wear underwear, but when I do they're just plain old boxer briefs. I like guys in tighty whities, though. They're sorta sleazy in a good way and when they sit down you can sometimes see some nutsack or taint hair.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:57
|
|
|
Pennywise the Frown posted:Don't question it. What. Nah man, you yank on ya dick and poke it out. Jockeys have "H-flys" and they are far superior. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
Sorry. The act of sitting down becomes a terrible gambit with silk boxers. Andrew Christian was mentioned - I have one pair of their butt-covering briefs and they are indescribably comfy. Also, their design does a dick-pouch thing which will make everybody, even in a totally professional setting, notice your giant cock.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
Too much work for me.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
Do It Once Right posted:Sorry. The act of sitting down becomes a terrible gambit with silk boxers. Whoa that is a gay site. They do look comfy tho
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
Pennywise the Frown posted:I've been out of the game for a while. Boy shorts sounds weird and doesn't make sense...... because boys never wear (not judging) that type of underwear. I just figured the one I posted was still considered that. There's just a billion styles of underwear, so they just name them all kinds of things because they need it to be as confusing as possible. And also have as many ranging price points for each individual style. They just call them boyshorts because they kinda look like boxers, I guess? I never really questioned it, honestly. Just sounds better than "smaller shorts under skirt" or something. Honestly, I think the closest thing to boyshorts for boys would just be boxerbriefs anyway. I don't know why they didn't just call shorts that for girls too. I'm sure some fashion person somewhere just wanted a commission for a new name for a thing.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:18
|
|
|
See it's pictures like that that made me think girls had their pussies right in the front under the hair when I was a kid. Maybe it's because the only time I saw them was in my dad's magazines from the 70's.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:21
|
|
|
I could never figure out how their pee made it in the bowl. I thought when they were peeing they'd lean way forward to point it down.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
can we confirm or deny that skylark and his boyfriend own these????
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:22
|
|
|
criscodisco posted:See it's pictures like that that made me think girls had their pussies right in the front under the hair when I was a kid. Maybe it's because the only time I saw them was in my dad's magazines from the 70's. There was some 'people on the street interview' I saw once where some girl was saying she grew up thinking penises were under a guy. And that sex was probably people just both on their backs trying to make the things meet. That was the first and only time I've heard of someone thinking that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 7, 2024 08:00 |
|
|
70's porn girls had really huge bushes, and most of the magazines didn't do much spread eagle stuff probably because they knew how awful vaginas looked.
|
|
#
?
Aug 7, 2016 03:32
|
|